Open 493 - Jungle Republic. (Game Over - Werewolf Victory)

Klick · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:48 am

I have opinions. I want to wait for everyone to post at least once before I give them, though.

zachattack · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:13 pm

I should probably /confirm.

I'll do something tangible tonight or tomorrow.

Bulbazak · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:13 pm

In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.

Well I hope you've improved since then. It was your first scum game, iirc.

Mac · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:14 pm

Why do you hope he has improved as scum?

Bulbazak · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:16 pm

His scum play in 1337 was dreadful. If he hasn't improved as scum since then, there's something wrong.

Mac · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:24 pm

I know it was. It lost us the game... but still, bad scum can only be good for the town?

Does Bo Know · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:30 pm

Mac makes a point. Why would you hope a scum game has improved unless you were scum with him yourself?

Icebox · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:35 pm

Similarly, why did Fuzzy get defensive about it? Being easily recognizable as scum shouldn't be a problem for him if he were town, it's actually advantageous for town him.

-Rem

Mac · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:37 pm

If confirming was in thread then scum wouldn't have had pre-game talk, right?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:42 pm

Where did I get defensive, Ice?

Icebox · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:43 pm

In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.

Mac · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:44 pm

In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.

In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.

In post 52, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.
Well I hope you've improved since then. It was your first scum game, iirc.

In post 54, Bulbazak wrote:His scum play in 1337 was dreadful. If he hasn't improved as scum since then, there's something wrong.

So... do these guys look like scum partners or what?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:45 pm

That wasn't me getting defensive. That was me telling Bulb that he was wrong. Big difference.

Mac · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:50 pm

It looks defensive. Especially the "I'm not as bad as you think I am" - surely you wouldn't care if he thought you were bad scum because you'd just prove him wrong by winning/outlasting him?

Or was that just a message to your buddy?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:51 pm

No, it was a message to someone who obviously hasn't been keeping up with my play.

I don't care what it looks like.

Bulbazak · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:52 pm

In post 56, Does Bo Know wrote:Mac makes a point. Why would you hope a scum game has improved unless you were scum with him yourself?

I like a challenge. If scum are not challenging me, the game's not fun. Plus, we should always be about self-improvement. I've been ragging on Fuzzy about his first scum game for awhile now, but I always hoped he would improve as a player. I'd much rather play with good players than bad ones, as bad ones suck the fun out of everything.

Does Bo Know · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:54 pm

Mac's town.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:54 pm

You aren't.

Icebox · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:56 pm

Why is Bo not town, fuzzy?

I'll be back tomorrow after my birthday party. cya!

-G

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:58 pm

1.) Pushing the lynch of his RVS vote.
2.) Stating people are town for no reason.
3.) Buddying Mac

Also

Happy Birthday GiF!

Does Bo Know · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:03 pm

In post 67, fuzzybutternut wrote:You aren't.

So vote me.

Icebox isn't an RVS vote.

Mac's town because scum would know whether or not they have pre-game talk. Mac didn't.

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:06 pm

Scum could just as easily fake that.

What's scummy about Icebox?

I like my vote where it's at.

Does Bo Know · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:18 pm

It looked sincere to me. He's actually scum hunting too by asking questions. So yeah, he's most likely town.

I'll explain why Icebox is probably scum when the time comes.

Why do you like your random vote where it is?

fuzzybutternut · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:20 pm

Tell me what Klick has done to

not

be scummy.

If you had more than one reason as to why you thought he was town, why didn't you say them all together? Now you're just making excuses for him.

Does Bo Know · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:23 pm

I'm keeping both of those secret until later.

I don't see how what I'm doing is scum motivated considering I'm promising to get to it later, but whatevs.