Page 3 of 71

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:48 am
by Klick
I have opinions. I want to wait for everyone to post at least once before I give them, though.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:13 pm
by zachattack
I should probably /confirm.

I'll do something tangible tonight or tomorrow.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:13 pm
by Bulbazak
In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.
Well I hope you've improved since then. It was your first scum game, iirc.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:14 pm
by Mac
Why do you hope he has improved as scum?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:16 pm
by Bulbazak
His scum play in 1337 was dreadful. If he hasn't improved as scum since then, there's something wrong.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:24 pm
by Mac
I know it was. It lost us the game... but still, bad scum can only be good for the town?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:30 pm
by Does Bo Know
Mac makes a point. Why would you hope a scum game has improved unless you were scum with him yourself?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:35 pm
by Icebox
Similarly, why did Fuzzy get defensive about it? Being easily recognizable as scum shouldn't be a problem for him if he were town, it's actually advantageous for town him. :?

-Rem

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:37 pm
by Mac
If confirming was in thread then scum wouldn't have had pre-game talk, right?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:42 pm
by fuzzybutternut
Where did I get defensive, Ice?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:43 pm
by Icebox
In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:44 pm
by Mac
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.
In post 52, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 47, fuzzybutternut wrote:
In post 46, Bulbazak wrote:For the record, 1337 is why Fuzzy will be caught in 3 pages if scum.
You do realize I just won a game as scum, when my partner was lynched early game, right?

I'm not as bad as scum as you think I am.
Well I hope you've improved since then. It was your first scum game, iirc.
In post 54, Bulbazak wrote:His scum play in 1337 was dreadful. If he hasn't improved as scum since then, there's something wrong.
So... do these guys look like scum partners or what?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:45 pm
by fuzzybutternut
That wasn't me getting defensive. That was me telling Bulb that he was wrong. Big difference.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:50 pm
by Mac
It looks defensive. Especially the "I'm not as bad as you think I am" - surely you wouldn't care if he thought you were bad scum because you'd just prove him wrong by winning/outlasting him?

Or was that just a message to your buddy?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:51 pm
by fuzzybutternut
No, it was a message to someone who obviously hasn't been keeping up with my play.

I don't care what it looks like.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:52 pm
by Bulbazak
In post 56, Does Bo Know wrote:Mac makes a point. Why would you hope a scum game has improved unless you were scum with him yourself?
I like a challenge. If scum are not challenging me, the game's not fun. Plus, we should always be about self-improvement. I've been ragging on Fuzzy about his first scum game for awhile now, but I always hoped he would improve as a player. I'd much rather play with good players than bad ones, as bad ones suck the fun out of everything.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:54 pm
by Does Bo Know
Mac's town.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:54 pm
by fuzzybutternut
You aren't.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:56 pm
by Icebox
Why is Bo not town, fuzzy?

I'll be back tomorrow after my birthday party. cya!

-G

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 12:58 pm
by fuzzybutternut
1.) Pushing the lynch of his RVS vote.
2.) Stating people are town for no reason.
3.) Buddying Mac

Also

Happy Birthday GiF!

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:03 pm
by Does Bo Know
In post 67, fuzzybutternut wrote:You aren't.
So vote me.

Icebox isn't an RVS vote.

Mac's town because scum would know whether or not they have pre-game talk. Mac didn't.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:06 pm
by fuzzybutternut
Scum could just as easily fake that.

What's scummy about Icebox?

I like my vote where it's at.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:18 pm
by Does Bo Know
It looked sincere to me. He's actually scum hunting too by asking questions. So yeah, he's most likely town.

I'll explain why Icebox is probably scum when the time comes.

Why do you like your random vote where it is?

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:20 pm
by fuzzybutternut
Tell me what Klick has done to
not
be scummy.

If you had more than one reason as to why you thought he was town, why didn't you say them all together? Now you're just making excuses for him.

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:23 pm
by Does Bo Know
I'm keeping both of those secret until later.

I don't see how what I'm doing is scum motivated considering I'm promising to get to it later, but whatevs.