Mafiascum.net

Amrun, how do you suppose we go about doing this? It seems that you have experience?

We can do something like only challenging when one guy get more than half of the "ARBITRARY" vote?

@Wisdom: Can you change back to your L avatar? I like that better.

No

In post 5, AngryPidgeon wrote:

In post 1, Haschel Cedricson wrote:game starts moving at a crazy pace.

Mollie, Majiffy and AP in the hooooouse

How dare you not put me in this list you traitor

In post 50, enomis wrote:Amrun, how do you suppose we go about doing this? It seems that you have experience?

We can do something like only challenging when one guy get more than half of the "ARBITRARY" vote?

@Wisdom: Can you change back to your L avatar? I like that better.

No, only when at least one player FROM EACH team reaches a pre-determined amount of arbitrary votes.

Wisdom, how much mafia experience do you have?

Less useless questions, Amrun. You can find that out with a click.

Answer my question. Experience isn't limited to mafiascum.

Haven't played elsewhere.
This type of questions are for the Road to Rome though, and I won't be answering any more.

No, they're for everywhere. You're espousing a patently terrible viewpoint and I want to know if you're misinformed or just inexperienced.

Isn't it convenient to try and call me a noob because I am calling you scum?

Better reaction than I had hoped for.

I'm not calling you a noob. I'm asking if you are.

If you're not and are generally not terrible, then it is perhaps relevant to your alignment.

Do you have a history of espousing this viewpoint?

I don't know, do I? You'll have to check that for yourself if you think it means anything.

But you don't; you're simply trying to call me a noob to lessen the strength of my argument.

No, actually, there is no reason not to answer my very simple question. Why so defensive?

My initial thought is that you're not a noob because you're a little more aggressive than I'd expect for that. But refusing to answer shows some image-consciousness that is interesting.

You'll excuse me if I don't answer whatever scum ask me, kay?

Reading any games will have to wait if I'm still interested; I should probably mention that my computer access is nonexistent every weekend and almost all of next week due to business (July 4th) but I still phone post during these times.

But a quick look at your topics says you've played a lot of games in a short period of time, which means you're just starting to come into that bravado stage where your ego is so big it can't fit through the door.

So you saying and doing really stupid things is most likely null.

And a tip; instead of subtly implying things, go ahead and state it if you think I'm scum. Maybe it will make you look a bit better than you do know.

pedit: There you go again, implying newbness. I so love being right.

now*

I don't think you're scum at all. I think you're probably town.

But asking questions to help determine your motivations is not something anyone should be being a dick about.

In post 64, Amrun wrote:But refusing to answer shows some image-consciousness that is interesting.

Then you should define "interesting" better, because in my eyes you're implying things here.

It really doesn't matter if I was calling you the scum lord of the pygmies and preparing to cook you over the fire on a spit. There's no town motivation to refusing to answer simple questions early game. I've decided you're more likely just being a jerk though.

So you calling me scum.

No, I was saying it's interesting. I looked into it. It became less interesting in light of your context as a player.

So what basically happened is;

who is this noob I have never played with before that accuses me? Let's call him a noob so nobody will pay any attention to what he says.
He's avoiding my questions now.. let's call him scum for that.
Actually no, it's not enough to call him scum, let's go back to implying he's a noob and call him jerktown.