Mafiascum.net

In post 49, ferretlover wrote:idk what now so

VOTE: om of dat nom

Still random because no reads yet out of this crap.

Try asking more questions.

BOOMSHAKALAKA (0)
Gnomeo (0)
Klick (1) 1baldeagle1
Smoker (0)
theaceofspades (0)
ferretlover (1) Yggdra Union
1baldeagle1 (1) ferretlover
TrumpetKing (1) Gnomeo
KrazyEyeKilla7 (3) theaceofspades, BOOMSHAKALAKA, TheFuzzyLogic99
Yggdra Union (0)
Om of the Nom (2) Klick, ferretlover
TheFuzzyLogic99 (1) Om of the Nom


Smoker, TrumpetKing

I guess I should take my vote off of Klick.

UNVOTE:

I feel bad voting for someone with two of my scummier reads. so

UNVOTE:

Krazy's post about fuzzy seems a bit premature but I think he was being genuine. I don't like BOOM's reaction to it though. I think he was reading it way to deep and going for a quick lynch.
VOTE: BOOM

I think Boom was just fishing for a scum-reaction from me with what he said early on, however aggressive he may have been with it.

Spade , I do not understand your logic on how I am really scummy just because I posted two generic and newbie post at the beginning. If go by that logic the town would lynch newbies the first round every game. As that great philosopher Spock would say " You reasoning is quite illogical"

Not to mention the imaginary argument you insist me and me and Krazy were having, The fact is that I posted one thing about Krazy which was 100 % accurate. He did misquote me .He accused me of being scummy with bad if not scummy reasoning I called him on it .

theaceofspades wrote:fuzzy's posts (not there are a lot of them) irk me if he's not a noob. Because what do they add to the discussion?

To me. if all you can post is

"Well, some people are mafia, and some aren't, i hope we catch them, because if we don't that means we lose, cause we're town amiright?"

that's not a good town read. It's not enough for me to say anything definitively, but i'm leaning toward scum.

Actually it's funny to me. because the reasons I think krazy and fuzzy are the highest scum-dar trippers, is their reactions to posts about each other.

@Union. Twitching my radar sounds really bad if you say it with the wrong inflection.

You also say me and Krazy are scummy but unvote Krazy. Are you saying I am more scummier than Krazy. To be honest I am really really confused with your logic and actions. Maybe you can clear things up .

In post 56, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Spade , I do not understand your logic on how I am really scummy just because I posted two generic and newbie post at the beginning. If go by that logic the town would lynch newbies the first round every game. As that great philosopher Spock would say " You reasoning is quite illogical"

This sounds like a fallacy that I can't quite put my finger on right now. I think it's something along the lines of slippery slope or maybe something like cause and effect.

Neverisquoted. For the 20 millionth time, I said it could be misread as a "scum read". I didn't say you were scum. Lets drop that, I do not think you are scum, but I do agree on the whole "over-explaining" thing.

Edit: Never misquoted

Uhm, I'm fairly sure I voted...
That being said it was just a beginning of the day vote.
UNVOTE: Yggdra Union

While Fuzzy is new to the forum, the fact that he says he's played a few games on other sites makes me think that we certainly shouldn't leave it as newbtown post, but maybe we should save it and see if we eventually find something else that points him to being scummy. Krazy has a case that I cab somewhat understand, but seeing as we have 16 IRL says I don't think we should rush anything yet.

Something else that sticks out to me is theaceofspade's post. Are you saying that you can't vote for somebody that has read two people the same way you have? Can you please clarify that?

Om

The way I read Spade quotes were that I was scummy because I posted a few posts that seemed newbie or irrelevant. My response was that if everyone used that logic than we would lynch newbies the first round. Okay maybe my argument was bit exaggerated but the logic stands. There is little to no relevance to read newbie posts as being scummy especially at the beginning of the game. This to me is bad logic. Seems like Spade is maybe pushing me to see if i will give a scummy response.

Krazey- You did misquote me but saying that I reread your original post. I think I misinterpreted what you were trying to say. You still are onmy radr but for now

In post 56, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Spade , I do not understand your logic on how I am really scummy just because I posted two generic and newbie post at the beginning. If go by that logic the town would lynch newbies the first round every game. As that great philosopher Spock would say " You reasoning is quite illogical"

Not to mention the imaginary argument you insist me and me and Krazy were having, The fact is that I posted one thing about Krazy which was 100 % accurate. He did misquote me .He accused me of being scummy with bad if not scummy reasoning I called him on it .

theaceofspades wrote:fuzzy's posts (not there are a lot of them) irk me if he's not a noob. Because what do they add to the discussion?

To me. if all you can post is

"Well, some people are mafia, and some aren't, i hope we catch them, because if we don't that means we lose, cause we're town amiright?"

that's not a good town read. It's not enough for me to say anything definitively, but i'm leaning toward scum.

Actually it's funny to me. because the reasons I think krazy and fuzzy are the highest scum-dar trippers, is their reactions to posts about each other.

@Union. Twitching my radar sounds really bad if you say it with the wrong inflection.

You also say me and Krazy are scummy but unvote Krazy. Are you saying I am more scummier than Krazy. To be honest I am really really confused with your logic and actions. Maybe you can clear things up .

In post 61, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Om

The way I read Spade quotes were that I was scummy because I posted a few posts that seemed newbie or irrelevant. My response was that if everyone used that logic than we would lynch newbies the first round. Okay maybe my argument was bit exaggerated but the logic stands. There is little to no relevance to read newbie posts as being scummy especially at the beginning of the game. This to me is bad logic. Seems like Spade is maybe pushing me to see if i will give a scummy response.

Krazey- You did misquote me but saying that I reread your original post. I think I misinterpreted what you were trying to say. You still are onmy radr but for now

Unvote Krazey

First. Are you a noob? if so, noob posts are acceptable. If no. Then they are not. simple as that. you have claimed to "play this game on other sites" so you're claiming non-noob status. Why post like a noob then? that's a scum read.


Also apparently saying something once=insisting. But then in his next post, he continues the very argument he accuses me of making up..... misqoute vs. not misquote.

Perhaps fuzzy you should look up the definition of "argument" because when two people disagree and try to prove each other wrong. that's an argument.

I also posted a perfectly good reason for unvoting krazy. two scum reads voting him. so I avoid what is possibly a mis-lynch. Yes krazy reads scummy. but no more then you and BOOM combined do. thus, the unvote.

In post 53, theaceofspades wrote:I feel bad voting for someone with two of my scummier reads. so

UNVOTE:

Aceofspades, please clarify this. It reads to me like you're saying that you're inviting someone who you read as scum, and I'm probably the only person that reads it that wau, so would you please explain it to mez as I have a hard time making sense of it?

*me

Gnomeo has been very quiet. All we've gotten from him was an RV yesterday.

@Spade- Am I new? that is just a ridiculous question. Of course I am new. Look at my status and my join date. Townsperson / joined August 19 2013. I never claimed I am new at the game just new at this site. There was an obvious difference. My post might seem newbieish since that I am new to the site and I am testing out the water. If you played at any other site you will know that each site is difference and have a different flow.
The funny thing is that after a few post I dropped the whole new thing and started to post more relevant info . You are the one that keeps bringing up about me being new. You are the one who are trying to convince others that I am scummy bc of things I posted early in the game.It seems like to me you are trying to bandwagon me.

Wow, we make a few post and me and Krazy is in this long drawn out argument apparently. My read is that you are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill. When you posted the statement about not liking how me and Krazy are talking to each other. (you think the conversation is scummy ) we had just two maybe three post directed at each other. He misquoted me in a way I felt at the time he was trying to make me out to be scummy in order to get me lynch. Rereading the post i change my mind about what his intention were.

May I add you have yet to answer Trumpet King Question. Are you trying to avoid answering it???

Honestly I have no idea what to make of you Spade. You are starting to feel really scummy to me.

In post 39, Yggdra Union wrote:That must be DP head.

/runs

-Luciana

@Fuzzy

You're getting awfully defensive for someone with only 1 vote against him

In post 67, BOOMSHAKALAKA wrote:

In post 39, Yggdra Union wrote:That must be DP head.

/runs

-Luciana

My sides

hahahaahahahaha

@Krazey

You say tow-mot-toes , I say Toe-mate-toes. You say defensive, I say mildly annoyed but slightly amused and bewildered.

You say Krazey, I say Krazy.

You can call it whatever you like, but I see defensive, especially in post 66.
Just like how I see "new to this site" as "played other games elsewhere, but throwing out justification for what I say"

You say you've dropped the whole "I'm new" act, yet there you are bringing it up again in an entire paragraph. If you were to actually drop it, you would. Any other comments about it could have been easily dismissed but you still find a need to explain yourself.

Fuzzy, I hate the newbie card, just saying.

Also, like Krazy said, you are getting extremely defensive and you only have one vote. Why is that?

In post 63, TrumpetKing wrote:

In post 53, theaceofspades wrote:I feel bad voting for someone with two of my scummier reads. so

UNVOTE:

Aceofspades, please clarify this. It reads to me like you're saying that you're inviting someone who you read as scum, and I'm probably the only person that reads it that wau, so would you please explain it to mez as I have a hard time making sense of it?

i don't really understand what you mean.... inviting them to what?

oh well. all I was saying was that 1)i'm voting for someone, i have a scumread on them. 2)two people are voting with me, i have a scumread on them.

so there are a couple possibilities, but one is that the person I'm voting is town and my other two reads are correct, Well why should I help scum? see what i'm saying? i don't want to help do something if the ONLY people trying to do it are my scumreads. UNLESS i feel very strongly about it, which at this point I don't, it's too early for that.

Also, i didn't answer trumpet's question earlier for one simple reason. I went to sleep.
Here's a tip, if I haven't posted AT ALL you can't call avoidance, until i post but ignore the question and just move on.


@fuzzy, i never said it was "long and drawn out." call it what you like, maybe you prefer the word tiff, or disagreement. The fact remains SOMETHING happened and it was strange

also. I'm bandwagoning? i'm not even voting for you. you're seriously over reacting. All i've said about ANYONE so far is "huh that's interesting, might be scummy" i say scum reads as relatively scummy compared with everyone else.

There's a good chance hasn't posted much yet. So that's why i'm not being dogmatic on anyone. It's just plain too early.

and why did you have to "drop the whole new thing" that phrase made me shiver. are you trying to act like something you're not? if you're really a noob how can you just drop your noobyness like that? i'd like to be able to do it too.

you say it's a stupid question. but you're the one muddiing the waters. "Hey guys i've never played here before, don't hold it against me" "wait no i've played this game a lot elsewhere take me seriously."

i find it hard to believe someone would seek out to be called a noob......
i don't think you are. because playing a game, regardless of locale of the game, still has the same basic mechanics. And I don't think that anywhere this game is played is there an expectation to start with "i hope scum are dumb because that will make it much easier for we town people to win"

TL;DR Stan Why are you so mad?

also @ boom.

laughing at your own joke? bad form