i don't have a personal vendetta against him. i quite like him.
peacebringer wrote:and what precisely do you think happens if you run someone up...
thinking ahead is not one of my strong suits
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:05 am
by PeaceBringer
In post 50, Rail Tracer wrote:i don't have a personal vendetta against him. i quite like him.
peacebringer wrote:and what precisely do you think happens if you run someone up...
thinking ahead is not one of my strong suits
well then carry on, we should get along just fine then...
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 2:48 am
by Dante
Vote SleepyKrew
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:18 am
by ooba
The question you need to ask yourself with respect to SleepyKrew is "Would scum go ahead and do that?" - and while this opens up a can of WIFOM, I would put a "negative utility" claim in the {high risk, low payoff} strategy for scum - so, probably not scum for now is where I would put him.
neroandmollie:
He did vote for SK on Page 1 but Page 2 posting talks about the vote count being wrong and MUM's opinion on peacebringer? Vibe of "Keep up activity levels" of posting scum play.
Dante:
Just a single vote on SK and nothing else? Prob. newbie scum afraid to say anything (unless he's an alt)
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:35 am
by N
narial
adjective
of or pertaining to the nares or nostrils.
Deadline is in
(expired on 2013-09-18 22:01:56)
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 4:38 am
by Dante
In post 53, ooba wrote:The question you need to ask yourself with respect to SleepyKrew is "Would scum go ahead and do that?" - and while this opens up a can of WIFOM, I would put a "negative utility" claim in the {high risk, low payoff} strategy for scum - so, probably not scum for now is where I would put him.
neroandmollie:
He did vote for SK on Page 1 but Page 2 posting talks about the vote count being wrong and MUM's opinion on peacebringer? Vibe of "Keep up activity levels" of posting scum play.
Dante:
Just a single vote on SK and nothing else? Prob. newbie scum afraid to say anything (unless he's an alt)
What more is there to say. Most likely he's claiming Miller. It's Day 1. Eliminate the WIFOM seems like the way to go. Why the defense?
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:58 am
by BBmolla
I don't even think he's scum for the claim in particular, I think he's just scum for his postings.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 7:29 am
by theloveofneroandmollie
In post 53, ooba wrote:neroandmollie: He did vote for SK on Page 1 but Page 2 posting talks about the vote count being wrong and MUM's opinion on peacebringer? Vibe of "Keep up activity levels" of posting scum play.
I don't think you know what you are talking about.
MUM is fairly notorious for fluff posting/not playing the game and I often scumread the two heads. I think we are kinda past the RVS stage so MUM coming in and not commenting is still sorta suspect.
In post 53, ooba wrote:neroandmollie: He did vote for SK on Page 1 but Page 2 posting talks about the vote count being wrong and MUM's opinion on peacebringer? Vibe of "Keep up activity levels" of posting scum play.
I don't think you know what you are talking about.
MUM is fairly notorious for fluff posting/not playing the game and I often scumread the two heads. I think we are kinda past the RVS stage so MUM coming in and not commenting is still sorta suspect.
What do you think of peace?
what do you think of peace? Why the need to fish for other folks opinion, what is your own?
That's what I think of peace. So your leaning a lil' scummy to me. Why are you afraid of me asking people about you?
any sense of fear is projected from your end... no fear from me... looks like you are looking for validation of one thing or another or seeing if you can get someone to go one direction or another. Just something that is noteable... also seems like a suck up quickly to another player... but those are minor observations...
That's what I think of peace. So your leaning a lil' scummy to me. Why are you afraid of me asking people about you?
any sense of fear is projected from your end... no fear from me... looks like you are looking for validation of one thing or another or seeing if you can get someone to go one direction or another. Just something that is noteable... also seems like a suck up quickly to another player... but those are minor observations...
and it is actually 2 people now you are "seeking for opinions" Guess what there 2 heads and 1 player in game who has any game experience with me and nothing completed. So opinions are short... but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:27 am
by theloveofneroandmollie
.............................................
You know how this game works right? One player finds another player scummy and they try to convince the rest of the town to lynch said player. I often see scum go for the cheap town cred of questioning a policy type lynch/senseless bw.
In post 61, PeaceBringer wrote:but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:27 am
by theloveofneroandmollie
.............................................
You know how this game works right? One player finds another player scummy and they try to convince the rest of the town to lynch said player. I often see scum go for the cheap town cred of questioning a policy type lynch/senseless bw.
In post 61, PeaceBringer wrote:but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:28 am
by PeaceBringer
FYI- Luna, Shadowy have a head with past exposure- some maybe brief incomplete exposure. BBMolla has had brief incomplete exposure.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:30 am
by Viera Assassin
In post 54, N wrote:Viera Assassin ( 2 ) Metal Unites Mutley
You know how this game works right? One player finds another player scummy and they try to convince the rest of the town to lynch said player. I often see scum go for the cheap town cred of questioning a policy type lynch/senseless bw.
In post 61, PeaceBringer wrote:but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
****engage explanatory mode**** clearly you have done no investigation into this said player and my experience with the game. Some things to know. I come from the "werewolf" school of play with fast games. QUick, limited posts and a definite lack of explained reasons. Pretty much lost count a long time ago of the # of games I played. Werewolf or mafia style. Spent 2 years playing here in 2004-2005. Left over some frustration over issues with the culture and overall players. Came back to play with Jake from State Farm. I also know by an large with a large sample size that people have a reaction to me as 'scummy' when they first encounter me. I am special like that. ****disegnaeg explantory mode
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:35 am
by PeaceBringer
In post 63, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
at this is contrary to the culture here... fyi. so good for you. But whatever read you may think you have you need to apparently have it validated by others before doing anything. Not quite sure of the motivation in that behavior or the potential of making that play... it is odd.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 8:38 am
by PeaceBringer
oh and N&M which ever of you is being so strange. You have a response to me that is a projected response of "seeking town cred" where you already assume that I have a need for such cred and that I give a rat's behind about how I appear.
In post 63, theloveofneroandmollie wrote:This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
at this is contrary to the culture here... fyi. so good for you.
But whatever read you may think you have you need to apparently have it validated by others before doing anything. Not quite sure of the motivation in that behavior or the potential of making that play... it is odd.
?????
I didn't know I needed anything validated. Asking others their opinion on something that *I* feel is important is scumhunting and moving the game foreword. It also potentially helps get a read on the other player whom I am asking.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:04 am
by SleepyKrew
I'm sick
OF THIS GAME
jk but I am sick irl
I will probably reread everything after my nap
I'll ask questions and whatnot then too VOTE: PB
You know how this game works right? One player finds another player scummy and they try to convince the rest of the town to lynch said player. I often see scum go for the cheap town cred of questioning a policy type lynch/senseless bw.
In post 61, PeaceBringer wrote:but your behavior of questioning others who do not know a player about a player you do not know is intriguing...
This is horrible. No one needs to "know" a player to have an opinion of their in game actions. This is tantamount to "you can't scumread me since you don't know me" which is just yuck.
****engage explanatory mode**** clearly you have done no investigation into this said player and my experience with the game. Some things to know.
I come from the "werewolf" school of play with fast games. QUick, limited posts and a definite lack of explained reasons. Pretty much lost count a long time ago of the # of games I played
. Werewolf or mafia style. Spent 2 years playing here in 2004-2005. Left over some frustration over issues with the culture and overall players. Came back to play with Jake from State Farm. I also know by an large with a large sample size that people have a reaction to me as 'scummy' when they first encounter me. I am special like that. ****disegnaeg explantory mode
me too!
so if you understand all of this then why the flak and interference when we are not only trying to read just you?
you kind of look like you got your hand caught in the cookie jar or something if you are town you should probably start towntelling.
Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:52 am
by Rail Tracer
dante wrote:Most likely he's claiming Miller.
he isn't
bbmolla wrote:I think he's just scum for his postings.
wait, you actually think sleepykrew is scum? i didn't know there were serious votes.
viera wrote:?
not hard to figure out that MUM is the reason it's 10 to lynch, or there's a hidden voting mechanic of some sort.