Mafiascum.net

Oh geeez you're right.

How did we fit that entire wagon on a boat?

In post 51, Aeronaut wrote:Oh geeez you're right.

How did we fit that entire wagon on a boat?

Why did you vote Brian?

Aren't you funny.

Prime scumspect#1

VOTE: Aeronaut

In post 52, fferyllt wrote:

In post 51, Aeronaut wrote:Oh geeez you're right.

How did we fit that entire wagon on a boat?

Why did you vote Brian?

Claiming Miller. And saying "vote me out first".

Now, where have I heard that before?

So, reads thus far

CDB Town because he really did a nice job getting us out of RVS and he's been p transparent thus far, and I liked his miller reaction

Aero Scum for sheeping and running someone up to L-1 before everyone has even checked in, let alone on page 2.

Brian probs scum for reasons CDB has said, but by no means should get lynched before everyone's even checked in.

The fact that an RVS wagon got formed on Brian before his claim seems entirely too coincidental, and the way he expressed his claim doesn't help alleviate that suspicion. But I like this wagon more:

In post 27, Kazekirimaru wrote:Not sure how to feel about miller claim.

Seen it legit before; seen it used as a scum gambit before.

You express yourself rather unsure about the miller claim, but yet are so adamant about them not being null tells in your next post. Then surely you have more of an opinion on the miller claim besides 'I dunno,' especially with the potential of the growing wagon.

In post 37, CrashTextDummie wrote:Lynch all D1 miller claims.

vote: Brian Skies

Hmm.... not much explanation for the vote, this vote was after the claim, so I'd say that's what its for. Seems Legit.

In post 35, notscience wrote:hm.

VOTE: Brian

Quite the insightful read! very thorough thought process. Seems legit.

In post 54, Aeronaut wrote:
Claiming Miller. And saying "vote me out first".

Gives actual reasoning, must be a scumbag, obviously.


So, the question is, what makes me so special?

Oh, nice early discredit.

@aeronaut: The difference is that notscience made the vote after clearly participating in the discussion. You made your vote upon your entrance.

In post 58, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 37, CrashTextDummie wrote:Lynch all D1 miller claims.

vote: Brian Skies

Hmm.... not much explanation for the vote, this vote was after the claim, so I'd say that's what its for. Seems Legit.

In post 35, notscience wrote:hm.

VOTE: Brian

Quite the insightful read! very thorough thought process. Seems legit.

In post 54, Aeronaut wrote:
Claiming Miller. And saying "vote me out first".

Gives actual reasoning, must be a scumbag, obviously.


So, the question is, what makes me so special?

Those posts are plucked from over a page of discussion among the players you're basically quote-mining here.

When you put your post down, it was evidently without knowing or caring what the vote count was. And it wasn't obvious to me whether it was an RVS vote or you had even read the thread, given that the vote was L-1.

In post 57, YYR wrote: You express yourself rather unsure about the miller claim, but yet are so adamant about them not being null tells in your next post. Then surely you have more of an opinion on the miller claim besides 'I dunno,' especially with the potential of the growing wagon.

Idk about HIS miller claim. But miller claims in general are not null. Apples and oranges.

I'm pretty alright with the aeronaut vote right meow


VOTE: Aeronaut

Not at all, my last name is Smith, therefore the nickname Smudger, which is a general nick name given to Smiths in the British armed forces, and my wife's last name is Miller... Why so serious so early off the bat Channel?

As for a Miller in this game, well have never played in a game with one, question is it a miller or is it another PR with a win condition that means it must lynch?

My last post is in answer to Channels post #24. Am on my phone so did not see there were pages 2 and 3. Will try to read through everything later today (RL).

In post 60, Brian Skies wrote:@aeronaut: The difference is that notscience made the vote after clearly participating in the discussion. You made your vote upon your entrance.

Yea?

In post 57, YYR wrote:The fact that an RVS wagon got formed on Brian before his claim seems entirely too coincidental, and the way he expressed his claim doesn't help alleviate that suspicion. But I like this wagon more:

Vote: Aeronaut

This is an entrance vote as well. ^

Sorry, didn't mean to rain on your logic, guess I didn't see it there since it doesn't exist.

In post 65, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 60, Brian Skies wrote:@aeronaut: The difference is that notscience made the vote after clearly participating in the discussion. You made your vote upon your entrance.

Yea?

In post 57, YYR wrote:The fact that an RVS wagon got formed on Brian before his claim seems entirely too coincidental, and the way he expressed his claim doesn't help alleviate that suspicion. But I like this wagon more:

Vote: Aeronaut

This is an entrance vote as well. ^

Sorry, didn't mean to rain on your logic, guess I didn't see it there since it doesn't exist.

And this time you're comparing your "Ahoy" plus vote to a post which clearly demonstrates the poster knows what's transpired in the thread so far and is making a reasoned vote, though the reasons are implied.

I'm not really sure how you should go about extracting your foot from that bucket, but this clearly isn't it.

Yea, saying that he "really liked this wagon more" is an awesome explanation.

And I'd like to point out that my post was on the second page of this thread, so not much had really happened besides the miller claim. And a post later, I explained my vote, clear and simple. Seems fine to me.

Bad excuses are bad and you should feel bad.

We got a live one, here.

In post 37, CrashTextDummie wrote:Lynch all D1 miller claims.

vote: Brian Skies

^^ Also a first post, saying exactly the same thing I said in mine.

Not saying that jumping on the pressure/miller wagon as my first post was entirely a good idea or entirely town-looking, but I AM saying that plenty of you just did the same thing.

You do realize there is barely any pressure on you at all, right? Why are you defending so hard?

lol D1 Millerclaim, u so cute
I'll post later when I care

o/

In post 6, Kazekirimaru wrote:VOTE: Brian Skies

Wagons, biznitch.

I don't think it's that hard, being pretty honest. I mean, I'm not just saying "Lynch me", which apparently works really well on you guys. I just figured since I'm the one with the spotlight, I may as well show what I think about it.

You'll know if I ever defend hard.

In post 69, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 37, CrashTextDummie wrote:Lynch all D1 miller claims.

vote: Brian Skies

^^ Also a first post, saying exactly the same thing I said in mine.

Not saying that jumping on the pressure/miller wagon as my first post was entirely a good idea or entirely town-looking, but I AM saying that plenty of you just did the same thing.

People get used to reading between the lines in posts. But there has to be something between the lines to read, and your post lacked that. Defense by attack and drawing terrible comparisons won't magically make up for that lack.

Have you played much forum mafia outside of here at MS?

In post 73, fferyllt wrote:

In post 69, Aeronaut wrote:

In post 37, CrashTextDummie wrote:Lynch all D1 miller claims.

vote: Brian Skies

^^ Also a first post, saying exactly the same thing I said in mine.

Not saying that jumping on the pressure/miller wagon as my first post was entirely a good idea or entirely town-looking, but I AM saying that plenty of you just did the same thing.

People get used to reading between the lines in posts. But there has to be something between the lines to read, and your post lacked that. Defense by attack and drawing terrible comparisons won't magically make up for that lack.

Have you played much forum mafia outside of here at MS?

Relax. Yea, I've played mafia before coming here. I understand how it works. Do you?