Page 3 of 26

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:25 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 45, notscience wrote:VOTE: notscience

Policy.
I like this wagon

Vote: notscience


Also:
In post 16, Elize Lutus wrote:it takes 7 to spontaneously assault someone with a wooden sword.
This made me lol

I agree with bork that Cabd is pretty town atm.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:27 am
by fferyllt
In post 47, Cabd wrote:
In post 46, fferyllt wrote:
In post 39, borkjerfkin wrote:I've seen town cabd try to scrub for gamebreaking info before, so there's my first townread
That's an awfully quick townread given who you're townreading.
Not everyone is infected by your specific brand of paranoia.
Noted.
In post 48, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 46, fferyllt wrote:That's an awfully quick townread given who you're townreading.
Explain?
Cabd makes a study of his own meta. And assorted other reasons for caution.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:27 am
by Cabd
Generic "here's why ffery is paranoid of me" post go!


An abridged history of "Gambits and Shit Cabd has Pulled in Mafia"

Chapter One: As Town
-Fakeclaim psychologist in RVS to get the SK to claim
-Fake a cop innocent on a townread
-Fakeclaim nuetral survivor in 3-man lylo with the other two crossed
-Faked having a QT with a dead player
-Faked a posting restriction to fly under the radar
-Faked a cop guilty on a huge scumread (they flipped scum)

Chapter Two: As Scum
-Claimed scum to get a daykill
-Faked hours of metadiving
-Coasted on a hider claim to a perfect win (TWICE)
-Used dead people to leverage my case against another player
-Watcher-guiltied my own teammate in MYLO to go on to win
-Pointed out my partner's scumslip on page one of a newbie
-Faked a towntell

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:28 am
by Sakura Hana
^
I wonder if you have that in a notepad and ready for eveyrtime anyone asks about ffery's paranoia.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:28 am
by borkjerfkin
In post 51, fferyllt wrote:Cabd makes a study of his own meta. And assorted other reasons for caution.
So should I not attempt to read him or what are you trying to say here?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:29 am
by borkjerfkin
In post 49, SXTLHGaiden wrote:Paranoia is usually the thing that keeps a person's head still attached to his body though.
How do you feel about this specific issue?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:29 am
by Cabd
In post 53, Sakura Hana wrote:^
I wonder if you have that in a notepad and ready for eveyrtime anyone asks about ffery's paranoia.
I do, actually.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:33 am
by fferyllt
In post 54, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 51, fferyllt wrote:Cabd makes a study of his own meta. And assorted other reasons for caution.
So should I not attempt to read him or what are you trying to say here?
You're townreading him on the basis of a page 1 post. I know you know you're talking about the mastermind of the Xenologue scum team.

It's an easy read to make if you know his alignment.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:36 am
by borkjerfkin
Why do people think I give a fuck about Xenologue?

Anything is an easy read to make if I know their alignment. Are you saying I'm being disingenuous in that I believe what he did with you is more likely to come from town than from scum?

If not, then why are you going down this bullshit burden of proficiency road already?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:37 am
by notscience
HEY GUYS

IM GOING TO BUDDY YOU ALL IN CAPS LOCK NOW

IS THAT COOL

TOO BAD DOING IT ANYWAYS

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:37 am
by fferyllt
In post 58, borkjerfkin wrote:Why do people think I give a fuck about Xenologue?

Anything is an easy read to make if I know their alignment. Are you saying I'm being disingenuous in that I believe what he did with you is more likely to come from town than from scum?

If not, then why are you going down this bullshit burden of proficiency road already?
I'm FoSing you.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:38 am
by borkjerfkin
You didn't answer any of my questions

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:39 am
by Sakura Hana
Actually

Vote: Gaiden


You won't get away this time with a newbie card.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:39 am
by SXTLHGaiden
Hi Sakura. I've already thrown that card away. I doubt it will as fun to do a second time.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:40 am
by notscience
SAKURA

WHERE THE FUCK IS YOUR SELFVOTE

ITS LIKE PAGE 3

YOU'RE SCARED AS FUCK SCUM AREN'T YOU

VOTE: Sakura

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:41 am
by borkjerfkin
NS quit fucking shitting up the thread

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:41 am
by Sakura Hana
@Gaiden: Good! so drop the fluff and start scumhunting

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:42 am
by SXTLHGaiden
^ why so angry bork?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:42 am
by borkjerfkin
I'm having a pretty fucking bad day. problem?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:42 am
by Cabd
In post 39, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 34, Skullduggery wrote:VOTE: borkjerfkin

What's a jerfkin and how do you bork it?
pretend I gave a witty fluff answer to that, but we actually have a non-fluff gamestate right now - any thoughts on page 1?

I've seen town cabd try to scrub for gamebreaking info before, so there's my first townread

p-edit: where are you going with this syry
In post 50, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 45, notscience wrote:VOTE: notscience

Policy.
I like this wagon

Vote: notscience


Also:
In post 16, Elize Lutus wrote:it takes 7 to spontaneously assault someone with a wooden sword.
This made me lol

I agree with bork that Cabd is pretty town atm.
So ffery why is bork's early townread worth a FoS but sakura's not?

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:45 am
by notscience
In post 66, Sakura Hana wrote:@Gaiden: Good! so drop the fluff and start scumhunting
Does this interaction look awkward to anyone else

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:46 am
by Cabd
Because if anything i'd think the reverse.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:46 am
by Sakura Hana
Indeed, if anything i have played more games with Cabd enough to be paranoid of him.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:47 am
by fferyllt
In post 61, borkjerfkin wrote:You didn't answer any of my questions
That's right. I didn't. I'm a relatively easy player to read, especially to meta-read. He spent his gambit on someone who could be sorted other ways.

It may be disingenuous. It may be incautious.

It leads to some unease about you.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:48 am
by borkjerfkin
In post 73, fferyllt wrote:That's right. I didn't. I'm a relatively easy player to read, especially to meta-read. He spent his gambit on someone who could be sorted other ways.
What the fuck does any of that have to do with me?