Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 10:20 am
I found his reply rather town actually. I was looking for "it was a joke" as a reason..
Buck, I told him to vote GM. why aren't you questioning me? Whats wrong with 3 votes on someone?
I found his reply rather town actually. I was looking for "it was a joke" as a reason..
Yes
In your experience, is "it was a joke" more common from Town or Scum?In post 50, jmo16mla wrote:I found his reply rather town actually. I was looking for "it was a joke" as a reason..
I assume that the reaction you were expecting is null reaction?In post 50, jmo16mla wrote:I was looking for "it was a joke" as a reason..
In post 41, jmo16mla wrote:People, vote goodmorning.
Do you think that mattered when I voted her?In post 57, Buckwild wrote:GIF, do you think GM's vote was real?
See this post..In post 41, jmo16mla wrote:People, vote goodmorning.
Yes. So did you?In post 60, GuyInFreezer wrote:Do you think that mattered when I voted her?In post 57, Buckwild wrote:GIF, do you think GM's vote was real?
youre scum.In post 65, goodmorning wrote:^Interesting
I'm new on mafiascum but I have played a lot of IRL mafia for years.jmo16mla wrote:
Newb scum like to unvote quickly when they realize they're wrong. Typically they don't move their vote to someone. I'm keeping my eyes on Chrisp, but he's town right now.
I'm not sure what GM could have said to the statement "youre scum" [sic] that isn't "hah no".CrisP wrote:Of course we are all fishing at the moment GM, still you could try to be proactive instead of defensive.
If you ask me, I think the idea of stimulating discussion can be very easily done by anyone, town or not. Moreover, why would a townsperson not be defensive while on the recieving end of the heat; and why would that be a bad thing for a townsperson to do?CrisP wrote:I liked the vote on me plus discussion, given my mistake about the game setup last time it's reasonable, but you could have elaborated more and after that you spent your time defending yourself, which is not pro town in my eyes, there's not much you can say to defend yourself at the start so you might as well show you are town by helping and ignore the random heat (if you're town).
Coincidence does not equal evidence, I'm afraid, and I'm one of those tricky people who insists on a bit more than "they're not here mostly" as a reason. Also; I don't see how that relates to that jmo16mla quote at all.CrisP wrote:In my opinion newbs lurk, especially if they are mafia. I want to point out to BW, since he didn't believe me at the time, that following that rule last game we would have found the two mafia after 40 posts day 1.
She could have said: why do you think I am mafia, or I'm not mafia and it's interesting you think so (cause in her mind that person is either mistaken or faking it), and these are just two replies that come to mind after 5 seconds of thought, I'm sure there are a lot of possibilities, being defensive is not wrong per se (as a human reaction it's a null tell or slightly scummy if you are playing against an expierienced mafia player), but it doesn't help the rest of town if that is her alignment.DiamondCrash wrote: I'm not sure what GM could have said to the statement "youre scum" [sic] that isn't "hah no".
Interesting opinion, which I completely disagree on. Why would mafia be interested in stimulating discussion? They have more information than anyone else in the game at the moment so for every thing they say they risk exposure, not to mention the more information you give to the rest of town the easier it is late game to determine what alignment you are (by looking at who you went against, who you voted, who you deflected for, what you posted), mafia just wants a confused or lynch hungry town so they can play pro mafia and not stand out. This is also one of the main reasons I will happily lynch possible quiet town if no consensus is reached on someone that looks mafia, especially day one, otherwise you risk lynching someone you should not have at a critical moment if that person has given you nothing to work on up till that point to determine his/her alignment.DiamondCrash wrote: If you ask me, I think the idea of stimulating discussion can be very easily done by anyone, town or not. Moreover, why would a townsperson not be defensive while on the recieving end of the heat; and why would that be a bad thing for a townsperson to do?
Well are you implying that I asked for a lynch on whoever hasn't spoken till now? Otherwise the non sequitor is in your comment, not mine. Mine relates in the sense that in my experience newbs as jmo called them don't behave in the manner he described, now it could be I never paid attention or noticed this pattern, it could be what he said is not true and that's why I highlighted it, tell me that is not pertinent.DiamondCrash wrote:Coincidence does not equal evidence, I'm afraid, and I'm one of those tricky people who insists on a bit more than "they're not here mostly" as a reason. Also; I don't see how that relates to that jmo16mla quote at all.
This assumes several things:In post 70, CrisP wrote:She could have said: why do you think I am mafia, or I'm not mafia and it's interesting you think so (cause in her mind that person is either mistaken or faking it), and these are just two replies that come to mind after 5 seconds of thought, I'm sure there are a lot of possibilities, being defensive is not wrong per se (as a human reaction it's a null tell or slightly scummy if you are playing against an expierienced mafia player), but it doesn't help the rest of town if that is her alignment.DiamondCrash wrote: I'm not sure what GM could have said to the statement "youre scum" [sic] that isn't "hah no".
To make themselves look Town.Why would mafia be interested in stimulating discussion?
In post 65, goodmorning wrote:^Interesting
In post 23, goodmorning wrote:Interesting.In post 21, Amethyst Snowflake wrote:VOTE: FERYFERY! wrote:You'll have to instalynch me if you really want to avoid 300+ of my posts. I'm writing wallz for another game tonight, so here's your chance!
UNVOTE:
VOTE: AA9
In post 2752, goodmorning wrote:Seeing as I think she is Scum...?In post 2743, TheIrishPope wrote:What do you make of Mala's posts?
I find it hilarious that the entire Mala wagon disintegrated. That is interesting.
This word "interesting" might as well be your scumclaim!In post 868, goodmorning wrote:Null: Bulba (because I can't stop flipflopping), Bacde (for not having read back (there's some interesting stuff back there))