In post 48, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm known for self-voting/self-hammering, tho it's something im trying to move away from.
Hermy's known for self-voting IN LYLO as town.
How many times have she done it and what was the reason for her to do so?
-L. J.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:58 am
by goodmorning
Fun fact: once I co-wrote a play.
The play was full of panties.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:59 am
by sangres
In post 47, MVP wrote:Let me see if I still remember my Mafia 101.
The point of RVS is to garner reactions and informations, which is the widely-accepted method to start Day 1, the day with almost no information.
Am I right?
-L. J.
IMO, the purpose of RVS is to end quickly. A post that both moves out of RVS and prolongs RVS is a tad eye-catching.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:59 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 50, MVP wrote:How many times have she done it and what was the reason for her to do so?
Once that I remember.
For the reason of being scumread, no one had piled any votes yet and she self-voted then scum quickhammered.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:05 am
by MVP
In post 52, sangres wrote:IMO, the purpose of RVS is to end quickly. A post that both moves out of RVS and prolongs RVS is a tad eye-catching.
Spoiler: Needless rant
That's not quite something I would agree with. Sure, it is optimal for RVS to end quickly, but stating the purpose of RVS is to just end it quickly is... That kinda defeats the whole purpose of RVS, now is it?
At least, now I can see where your post is coming from.
In post 52, sangres wrote:IMO, the purpose of RVS is to end quickly. A post that both moves out of RVS and prolongs RVS is a tad eye-catching.
Spoiler: Needless rant
That's not quite something I would agree with. Sure, it is optimal for RVS to end quickly, but stating the purpose of RVS is to just end it quickly is... That kinda defeats the whole purpose of RVS, now is it?
At least, now I can see where your post is coming from.
-L. J.
Spoiler: my own rant
well, maybe, but IMO only one thing actually
ends
RVS and that's game-relevant content, which IMO RVS mostly isn't.
It depends. But I think SK should be leashed most of the time. (The exception being the situation where it is pointless to leave SK alive, e.g. almost-town-autowin)
-L. J.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:36 am
by Wake1
Just to clarify, if we ever come across a debacle whether to lynch or leash claimed SK, I'll be vehemently in favor of breaking its neck.
In post 48, Sakura Hana wrote:I'm known for self-voting/self-hammering, tho it's something im trying to move away from.
Hermy's known for self-voting IN LYLO as town.
How many times have she done it and what was the reason for her to do so?
-L. J.
Yuck.
Vote: MVP
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:42 am
by MVP
Your face is Yuck.
-L. J.
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:43 am
by Toomai
In post 43, MC Maraca wrote:Actually, good question for everyone. SK is found day one. Lynch or leash? Give reasoning, there will be a grading rubric.
I don't see the point in trying to control a third party who has essentially already lost all hope of winning. There's no reason for them to follow along.
In post 30, sangres wrote:If we don't know each other, then the question isn't quite so strange.
Well, then.
Back to my question.
What of that bothered you? Because that post looked quite normal to me.
-L. J.
Where did you get 'bothered' from a simple question? Why are you so bothered about her botheredness?
~Jekyll
I am bothered about her botheredness of that post because it somewhat bothers me how her question bothers my inner senses enough to be bothered enough to ask such a bothersome question.
tl;dr - It's awkward to me to see her pick up on things like that. It might be my memory failing me, but I don't remember her playing like this the last time I played with her.
In post 43, MC Maraca wrote:Actually, good question for everyone. SK is found day one. Lynch or leash? Give reasoning, there will be a grading rubric.
I don't see the point in trying to control a third party who has essentially already lost all hope of winning. There's no reason for them to follow along.
We think leash in the short run, and kill immediately upon deviation. We also feel like it's probably a moot point.
What was the reasoning behind this? I've seen respectable players do it because they know the game is winnable if they do so.
In post 61, Toomai wrote:I don't see the point in trying to control a third party who has essentially already lost all hope of winning. There's no reason for them to follow along.
Honor, most third parties would rather see town win the mafia win plus there is always the chance that the town massively cock ups and they can win.
In post 30, sangres wrote:If we don't know each other, then the question isn't quite so strange.
Well, then.
Back to my question.
What of that bothered you? Because that post looked quite normal to me.
-L. J.
Where did you get 'bothered' from a simple question? Why are you so bothered about her botheredness?
~Jekyll
I am bothered about her botheredness of that post because it somewhat bothers me how her question bothers my inner senses enough to be bothered enough to ask such a bothersome question.
tl;dr - It's awkward to me to see her pick up on things like that. It might be my memory failing me, but I don't remember her playing like this the last time I played with her.
Is something bothering you about MVP's botheredness?
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:55 am
by Doctor Jekyll
A little. It's more the body of work, they haven't said anything that sounded right to me. They are asking a lot of pointless questions.
-Hyde
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:38 am
by Hermy
Holy crickets. I self-voted in Ly-Lo
- Once
- In my first newbie game
- When I was extremely pissed off
- And was going to get lynched anyway
I've never done it otherwise. Ugh. It was a one off, I feel stupid for doing so, but I'd truly prefer it if I wasn't labelled as bad for something I did ONCE, ages ago
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:39 am
by Sakura Hana
I know.
And it was my RVS vote.
You getting this pissy about it is giving me bad vibes.
That kinda defeats the whole purpose of RVS, now is it?