Mafiascum.net

In post 48, cxinlee wrote:I don't get any vibes from him

In post 52, cxinlee wrote:Ok.

My read is null

And I'm not voting

In post 26, Thor665 wrote:

In post 14, Porkens wrote:Duhhh, sure, although it's really obvious. You two are distancing.

Using the same logic you're distancing too.
So...basically 'blargh, wiki tell!' at work. Meh.

I like your current vote though, so there is that.

In post 36, Thor665 wrote:

In post 33, Zekrom25 wrote:

In post 11, Thor665 wrote:Nah, I still think you're scum. Currently all I have on him is poor play. If it changes - you'll know.

details please & why do you think it's poor play ?

I'm leaving the extra stuff quoted because...as far as I can tell you're asking the same question twice and acting like it's two. If I'm wrong you need to clarify, but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to give details about poor play *and* say why it's poor play - that's the same thing.

But, basically, anyone working on a "distancing" case on Page 1 is already pretty much admitting he's rectally extracting so deeply that he's fondling his own tonsils...but, in *addition* to that, for the reason of his vote on Bulbazak to make any sense then I also have to be scum with the exact same validity - and he chose to unvote an equal read to vote a different equal read. It' sjust all sloppy and badly done.

Never mind that Bulbazak's reaction to me in Post 7 was *way* more flinchy and also waaaay not a scum/scum interaction, and there you go.
I wouldn't cry if Porkens was lynched, but I don't currently see it as a case worth pushing on either. He's still just derping around in RVS while Bulbazak *has* committed an actual scum reaction - so therefore I'm not moving.

Now, what did *you* see in the posting on Page 1 thus far?

In post 51, Zekrom25 wrote:@Porkens what do you think of XScorpion ?

In post 53, XScorpion wrote:

In post 52, cxinlee wrote:Ok.

My read is null

And I'm not voting

How are you helping town?

In post 38, Thor665 wrote:::double checks XScorp's join date...shakes head sadly...returns to game.::

In post 56, cxinlee wrote:

In post 53, XScorpion wrote:

In post 52, cxinlee wrote:Ok.

My read is null

And I'm not voting

How are you helping town?

Not being honest is worst

In post 46, cxinlee wrote:

@Zekrom and Cxin: Why aren't you commenting on what's going on?

Because there is nothing I want to comment on.

In post 49, Porkens wrote:

In post 28, Bulbazak wrote:

In post 13, Porkens wrote: MMMMM and THAT is what you call a flinch.

A flinch? You got overzealous and set up a false dichotomy in RVS. You were essentially cheerleading my poking of Thor, and now you're saying that we're both distancing from each other after you've been called out? Learn to be more subtle in the future.

@Zekrom and Cxin: Why aren't you commenting on what's going on?

how many more buzzwords could you have fit in there scum?

In post 58, XScorpion wrote:

In post 56, cxinlee wrote:

In post 53, XScorpion wrote:

In post 52, cxinlee wrote:Ok.

My read is null

And I'm not voting

How are you helping town?

Not being honest is worst

That sentence is not an appropriate answer to my question. Maybe I should rephrase:
Are you helping town? If so, how?

In post 60, cxinlee wrote:

In post 58, XScorpion wrote:

In post 56, cxinlee wrote:

In post 53, XScorpion wrote:

In post 52, cxinlee wrote:Ok.

My read is null

And I'm not voting

How are you helping town?

Not being honest is worst

That sentence is not an appropriate answer to my question. Maybe I should rephrase:
Are you helping town? If so, how?

No

In post 61, Porkens wrote:Naw, it started out as a distancing theory, but now it's about your <repeated> flinching. You feel like scum who's pissed he's getting called out so early.

In post 66, Zekrom25 wrote:@Everyone what do you think of

Yates ?
Zekrom25 ?
Bulbazak ?
Porkens ?
T S O ?
smargaret ?
Yiley ?
Smudger ?
cxinlee ?
XScorpion ?
zakk ?
Thor665 ?
BROseidon ?

In post 64, cxinlee wrote:No comment

In post 67, XScorpion wrote:

In post 66, Zekrom25 wrote:@Everyone what do you think of

Yates ?
Zekrom25 ?
Bulbazak ?
Porkens ?
T S O ?
smargaret ?
Yiley ?
Smudger ?
cxinlee ?
XScorpion ?
zakk ?
Thor665 ?
BROseidon ?

This is the laziest attempt at pretending to scum-hunt I have ever seen.

In post 71, Zekrom25 wrote:

In post 67, XScorpion wrote:

In post 66, Zekrom25 wrote:@Everyone what do you think of

Yates ?
Zekrom25 ?
Bulbazak ?
Porkens ?
T S O ?
smargaret ?
Yiley ?
Smudger ?
cxinlee ?
XScorpion ?
zakk ?
Thor665 ?
BROseidon ?

This is the laziest attempt at pretending to scum-hunt I have ever seen.

@XScorpion please provide more details to your response

In post 41, XScorpion wrote:I think actively and openly desiring to prolong RVS is scummier than 'flinching'.

In post 45, Bulbazak wrote:Your post was crap, and I pointed it out. Not to mention the fact that you've seen me handle larger wagons as scum, so the fact that you're trying to push something as ridiculous as "flinching" (What is that?) is laughable.

In post 49, Porkens wrote:how many more buzzwords could you have fit in there scum?

In post 73, Thor665 wrote:

In post 45, Bulbazak wrote:Your post was crap, and I pointed it out. Not to mention the fact that you've seen me handle larger wagons as scum, so the fact that you're trying to push something as ridiculous as "flinching" (What is that?) is laughable.

Then why are you flinching instead of laughing? Your immediate reply was to complain about OMGUS on Page 1, with my first vote, and my first post. Like, what sort of town mindset goes there while sounding serious? None of them, you were sweating, and the fear made you over act, and that is the flinch. What of it?