Jake from State Farm wrote:vote: sal
Jake from State Farm wrote:@tn - Sal isn't lynchbait. He's a very manipulative person who knows how to gambit as scum to get town read.
Ah hahaha. I have been waiting for that. Oh Jake, I have missed you. I hope life has been treating you well.
Anyways your vote and explanation for it read to me as "Policy." We do not have time for this, especially when we have actual suspects.
If you of all people thought that was a true claim, Then I am so sad. Let's get you in the real game, shall we?
First of all, how do you feel about Mirhawk?
And secondly, what would you say if I told you I see TN reminds me of Rapidcanyon?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next up, everyone should take note on how it takes TN too many posts to actually answer the question HC gave him.
Is this a serious question? Miller would be a terrible day one claim.
Ask Jake how he feels about this. He will tell you otherwise. Always lynch the Miller D1. Always.
Why would it not be a serious question based on your actions? And miller would be a terrible claim for who? I recall there was a time where the accepted play for a miller was to claim in the first post; is this no longer true?
Ask Jake how he feels about this. He will tell you that it doesn't matter, Miller will die when the words come out of his mouth.
I am not very familiar with millers so I wouldn't know what the accepted play is, but it seems to me that claiming miller is pretty much a guaranteed mislynch as town generally can't take the chance that you're scum fakeclaiming, whereas if you keep it to yourself it might never come up basically making you a VT with a bit of a disadvantage. It comes to being either a guaranteed mislynch or a possible one.
Ask Jake how he feels about this. He will tell you that Millers are a necessary mislynch.
As for why I asked if it was a serious question. If I had thought Sal was scum I would have voted him, I did not so I didn't.
So instead you made TWO joke posts implying Sal was scum with no indication that they were jokes?
They were a little deadpan I admit, but I think its still fairly obvious I wasn't making a serious accusation.
Bullshit. Vote stays until TN does something even more scummier. This is called opportunistic. It is when scum say, oh he might be scum, but I don't feel like wagoning. Then later, gains towncred for not going on it. I don't buy this joke. I don't see the joking anywhere.
In response to 53:
Actually the response was much earlier, but...
This is how I saw it happen. Sal posts a page1 claim, mirhawk provides skepticism without voting, sal throws a 'serious' vote on mirhawk. Why? No idea.
From what I've seen of Salamence, he doesn't really care how scummy he looks. I'm a bit skeptical of the claim because of who is claiming it, rather than the claim itself.
This is your second post defending Mirhawk by trying to discredit. Keep going
I read it as half-sarcastic half-serious. I recommend specifically pointing out sarcasm or jokes in the future.
This is your third post defending Mirhawk by trying to discredit. You're almost past Mirhawk.
Sal is mislynch bait as-is, assuming he's town.
So is this debate TownVTown, or SCUMVTOWN, and who is who?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@EVERYONE ELSE:
Who is more scummy at this point? TN or Mir?
