Those who have not confirmed have 48 hours to do so ending in: (expired on 2014-11-04 19:15:00)
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 9:52 am
by Bookitty
I think taking RVS seriously is neither a towntell nor a scumtell. It seems more like a playstyle tell to me.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:40 am
by Flubbernugget
Sheeping the reads of the leading wagon?
Why the fuck not.
VOTE: Garmr
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:07 pm
by 2birds1stone
Primate wrote:
↑2birds1stone wrote:Bad vote, ProHawk is taking it at least just as seriously. Also, taking RVS seriously is pro-town.
Is treating RVS seriously an intentional play you are making in this game?
Yes.
↑VictorDeAngelo wrote:Why does ProHawk taking things just as seriously make my vote bad?
Because you didn't comment on it. Singling one out without commenting on the other points towards feigned scumhunting.
Victor/Garmr scumteam, ProHawk possible third member.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:23 pm
by Primate
Ok then. Why are you going into this game actively trying to look town?
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:42 pm
by 2birds1stone
It's not the primary aim.
I was taking RVS seriously because the opportunity to attempt to spook Garmr presented itself.
Also, trying to look town is a good thing providing it results in you actually helping town.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:55 pm
by WaffleGhost
As town, appearing town benefits the town, unless of course, your just out for town cred. Appearing town is good but it should be something that happens naturally by actions and not by you hunting for opportunities to win over the town's trust, in my opinion. Only scum is concerned with being the towniest of the town for the most part.
Here are 2 mindsets
Must look town must look town. . . must. . . look. . . town. . . .
I'm gonna be a bad ass scum hunting machine, who cares if I get my complexion a bit dirty?
I'm not accusing you of being scum, yet. Just stating my opinion as far as play. I'm just a dumb newbie though
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:01 pm
by Bookitty
↑WaffleGhost wrote:Appearing town is good but it should be something that happens naturally by actions and not by you hunting for opportunities to win over the town's trust, in my opinion. Only scum is concerned with being the towniest of the town for the most part.
This. So much this.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:04 pm
by Bookitty
↑Flubbernugget wrote:Sheeping the reads of the leading wagon?
Why the fuck not.
What reads are you sheeping exactly?
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:07 pm
by Gendaberry
VOTE: 2birds1stone
Why do you suddenly think that ProHawk could be scum? You say that he's taking RVS seriously, and that taking RVS seriously is pro-town, but you still seem to think that he's scum for some reason. It seems to me like you're calling him scummy just for the sake of having another scum read.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:11 pm
by 2birds1stone
ProHawk as possible Victor buddy.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:46 pm
by Jackel98
If we're going to start guessing scumteams, can I guess two birds and a stone as the three members?
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 2:52 pm
by Jackel98
Srsly tho, I agree with Bookitty about RVS. I personally just discard RVS as the phase to get out the idiot juices and wait for everyone to rear his/her/its ugly mug and say hello. I'm not too analytical, mainly because I'm too lazy, but usually don't find much of consequence in RVS.
↑2birds1stone wrote:ProHawk as possible Victor buddy.
You're gonna have to spell this one out please.
Ignoring you in favour of BooKitty when you were both "guilty" of the same "tell".
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:23 pm
by Garmr
Doesn't anyone want to point that 2bird1stone is omgusing me?
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:40 pm
by 2birds1stone
Only because you chainsawed your buddy.
Not sure how much of this is confirmation bias, but it honestly works so well as a scumteam.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:50 pm
by Garmr
↑2birds1stone wrote:Only because you chainsawed your buddy.
Not sure how much of this is confirmation bias, but it honestly works so well as a scumteam.
Hmmm so why didn't you vote me for chainsawing but instead you voted me for saying lol and justifying your vote with lol by saying caught for the wrong reasons. Makes me wonder if you actually had anything at all.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:55 pm
by 2birds1stone
I didn't know he was your buddy at the time, it only became apparent in retrospect!
So yeah, probably confirmation bias.
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:56 pm
by 2birds1stone
It doesn't matter though, you're so hung up on being voted that I'm sure about you, even if my other reads are wrong.