↑ Kise wrote:I'm willing to compromise being townread in order to get results - Namely, to have this back and forth with you that helps me read you. Again you paint me as a possible villain instead of interrogating MM.
It would have been simple to ask MM in all seriousness, "why did you pardon Kise but give a legit vote on Wal?"
Or, in post 48, you could have addressed to me by asking "why didn't you engage MM further?"
How would you have engaged MM if you were in my shoes?
The point was less about you, and more than the fact that Monkey brushed you off. Your actual reaction is somewhat in ancillary except for the possible reasons:
1) Possible link between you and MM if MM flips scum (too soon to really tell this, and I don't have delusions on page 3 that MM is going to be the play today)
2) Possible continued passive reactions which could lead to not scum hunting (which is why I engaged you)
You, could have engaged Monkey with 'no, seriously, dude, if double posts bother you, it makes no sense to vote Wal and not me, why didn't you vote for/engage me' or even 'that seems like a lame reason
not
to vote someone'. I'm more bugged that you were passive in saying that Monkey's avatar was cute and that you've placed a RVS vote on Sorcerer than actually engage with someone you found suspicious.
Do I believe you're scum? The fact you're willing to engage lends to the idea that you might fucking not be, but the fact that you're mildly passive bugs me a little. Not enough to vote you over it versus Monkey or Wal or even Jester.
"You live for the fight when it's all that you've got."--Bon Jovi, Living on a Prayer