I'm not going on much more than holy shit that wall of text.
You should read the wall of text. I am the IC, so that "holy shit that wall of text" is part of my job in this game. It has absolutely nothing to do with my alignment, and if you had read it you would have read the part where I even pointed that out.
↑literallypam wrote:And also because it seems like everyone wants a Drixx lynch but everyone who hasn't voted is scared they'll look bad jumping on now.
Umm... We're 50 votes into the game. Can you quote the posts by people whom you believe want to wagon me but were "scared" to do so?
Regardless of your intent, I think you pretty firmly knocked us well out of RVS so thanks for that at least.
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 1:30 pm
by literallypam
I throw out some votes and see how people react to them. That's the game as far as I know. It really isn't very important who gets lynched today anyway, because we're all just bullshiting right now.
What is your favorite joke?
Today, my Dad told me I was adopted. And so I said, "what the hell dad, you're waited all these years and NOW you tell me?" And he said, "I'm telling you because you need to get your bags packed, they'll be here in the next 5 minutes."
What is the longest amount of time you have ever stayed awake?
About 2 days, in the military. Haven't done anything terribly interesting.
What is your worst fear?
I don't know if you'd call it a fear but I haaate small dogs.
Icecream or Pizza?
Pizza easily
If you could have only one meal for the rest of your life, what would it be?
A well rounded one for sure haha.
If you became a multi-millionaire overnight, what would you buy?
An apartment closer to the beach? A mil ain't what it used to be.
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:31 pm
by kagesong
Man, psychological warfare is FUN. I mean, it's great that people don't realize that they give out hints to their alignment even during the BS stage of the game. I think I have a good idea who scum is .
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:45 pm
by Drixx
↑kagesong wrote:Man, psychological warfare is FUN. I mean, it's great that people don't realize that they give out hints to their alignment even during the BS stage of the game. I think I have a good idea who scum is .
↑kagesong wrote:Man, psychological warfare is FUN. I mean, it's great that people don't realize that they give out hints to their alignment even during the BS stage of the game. I think I have a good idea who scum is .
Wanna share with the class?
Rufus and Pam are on my list of good suspects. Then again, I would possibly make my own list of good suspects.
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:23 pm
by literallypam
I figured anyway, but can you explain what exactly makes you think that?
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:12 pm
by kagesong
↑literallypam wrote:I figured anyway, but can you explain what exactly makes you think that?
It's fairly simple plychology. Your assumed carelessness as to who gets lynched gives you a more innocent air. A ploy to make others believe you would not care if you were voted for. Thus attempted to relieve any suspicion. As for the other, his desire to protect another player in round one. It could suggest that he's doing so to appear as a good guy. Of course, though, as I said, my very analysis of this and the ensuing statement, could even mark me as scum.
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:12 pm
by Rufus Delorian
Surely those reasons only work if you start off with the assumption that we're both scum.
If you started from the assumption that we're town then those would be reasons to further assume we're town. i.e.
kagesong wrote:
Your assumed carelessness as to who gets lynched gives you a more innocent air.
Therefore they seem innocent, so town
kagesong wrote:
As for the other, his desire to protect another player in round one. It could suggest that he's doing so to appear as a good guy.
So I'm a good guy, also town.
I'm not sure about literallypam, I mostly got the impression that they just quickly skimmed the first page and posted after getting poked...it could have been a scummy attempt to push Drixx to L-1 without realising that people had changed votes, so I'm not claiming that literallypam is town, just that the reasoning you gave is flawed.
Literallypam seems scummier to me now than Reubus, basically same reasoning as before, admittedly weak reason.
UNVOTE: Reubus Swagrid
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 8:40 am
by Drixx
↑literallypam wrote:I figured anyway, but can you explain what exactly makes you think that?
Can you answer my earlier question?
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2016 12:03 pm
by kagesong
But, Rufus, one might say that the very reason you're being a "good guy" is to make us believe you are something you are not. And it does seem you try awful hard.
↑literallypam wrote:I figured anyway, but can you explain what exactly makes you think that?
Can you answer my earlier question?
Which one? I thought I had
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:06 am
by Reubus Swagrid
Checking in fam. I sorta switch off during weekends but I'll catch up in a moment
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:16 am
by Reubus Swagrid
Spoiler: Holy shit that wall of text
↑Rufus Delorian wrote:Surely those reasons only work if you start off with the assumption that we're both scum.
If you started from the assumption that we're town then those would be reasons to further assume we're town. i.e.
kagesong wrote:
Your assumed carelessness as to who gets lynched gives you a more innocent air.
Therefore they seem innocent, so town
kagesong wrote:
As for the other, his desire to protect another player in round one. It could suggest that he's doing so to appear as a good guy.
So I'm a good guy, also town.
I'm not sure about literallypam, I mostly got the impression that they just quickly skimmed the first page and posted after getting poked...it could have been a scummy attempt to push Drixx to L-1 without realising that people had changed votes, so I'm not claiming that literallypam is town, just that the reasoning you gave is flawed.
Literallypam seems scummier to me now than Reubus, basically same reasoning as before, admittedly weak reason.
UNVOTE: Reubus Swagrid
Same reasoning as before? Idk, my vote was a playful RVS vote. Pam pretended there was a case. I wasn't aware that I was being voted for being scummy and not for the purpose of RVS anyway.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:17 am
by Reubus Swagrid
↑kagesong wrote:Man, psychological warfare is FUN. I mean, it's great that people don't realize that they give out hints to their alignment even during the BS stage of the game. I think I have a good idea who scum is .
Brainstorming.
Would that be Rufus and Pam?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:21 am
by Reubus Swagrid
@Zaicon
Prods and perhaps a sub for guttsa?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:22 am
by kirroha
Can we have a prod on guttsa please?
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:52 am
by Rufus Delorian
@Kagesong - one might think that way, there's not really any way to respond to that though...act like a bad guy?
@Reubus - Same reasoning is that I reckon lynching the IC on the first day is likely to benefit scum...is that really such a scummy thing to suggest? Is it wrong? I'm legitimately asking since I've not played before, the reasoning sounds right to me but it apparently makes me look scummy.
You could have been random voting or maybe trying to sneak a real vote into the middle of a drixx lynch, I admitted it was a weak reason and since we're out of RVS, I'm not voting based on it anymore.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:43 am
by Reubus Swagrid
↑Rufus Delorian wrote:@Kagesong - one might think that way, there's not really any way to respond to that though...act like a bad guy?
@Reubus - Same reasoning is that I reckon lynching the IC on the first day is likely to benefit scum...is that really such a scummy thing to suggest? Is it wrong? I'm legitimately asking since I've not played before, the reasoning sounds right to me but it apparently makes me look scummy.
You could have been random voting or maybe trying to sneak a real vote into the middle of a drixx lynch, I admitted it was a weak reason and since we're out of RVS, I'm not voting based on it anymore.
There can be no Drixx lynch without a Drixx case. I voted him 14 posts into the game for shits and giggles. If scum was able to hold their RVS vote as a lynch vote I would giggle and shit. Your reasoning is correct but out of context for this situation
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:50 am
by Reubus Swagrid
trying to sneak a real vote into the middle of a drixx lynch
Shit he's seen through my gameplan
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 2:55 am
by Reubus Swagrid
Simply put;
I didn't push my RVS vote nor build a case on Drixx. I would like to think there is at least a subtle difference between RVS voting the IC and lynching them.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:45 am
by kirroha
VOTE: Rufus
Putting someone on L-2 is a great way to get this game out of the RVS bullshitting stage. Not a fan of RQSes because they do nothing and just create more nonsense to sift through.
guttsa better show up asap because that was a terrible first post before vanishing.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:52 am
by Rufus Delorian
Reubus, I get that, that's why I'm not voting atm.
Not sure who looks scummy right now, literallypam case seems weak for the same reason you gave, they're not pushing for anything.
I'd say kagesong might be suspect, surely scum would be the ones who enjoy engaging in psychological warfare and someone in a lying mindset would see the ways innocent comments could be sneaky lies.
But then maybe I'm biased because they're voting for me.
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 3:57 am
by kirroha
↑Rufus Delorian wrote:
But then maybe I'm biased because they're voting for me.
???
I don't like this part of your post. What do you mean you're 'biased'? Do you find their votes on you scummy, or do you think that these votes are not scummy but are clouding your judgment?