Page 3 of 83

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:51 pm
by Creature
Unused to early town activity?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:54 pm
by Robbnva
Can't determine if this activity is town or not. It's weird to me that anyone can have a page 2 town read though.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:57 pm
by Creature
It's not weird for me. Scum are usually less concentrated this early and reads are easier to get.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 1:57 pm
by Creature
Are we just going to discuss game theories?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:01 pm
by Creature
In post 5, Eggman wrote:Hello, everyone! General question: what's your favorite dessert?
VOTE: Creature (I won't lurk this time if you don't.)
Hello, I am not lurking, what about you?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:04 pm
by Robbnva
Nothing else to talk about atm so why not. Hopefully it'll help me figure you out

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:08 pm
by Creature
Okay.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:08 pm
by Creature
What do you think about Eggman's RQS?

It's not related to the game and usually his first posts are somewhat related to the game.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:15 pm
by Robbnva
I'm not usually a fan of rqs but it doesn't really bother me.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:32 pm
by atm487
VOTE: Crazycrab sheep

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:39 pm
by Smithereens
First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\


VOTE: Creature
Somewhat serious vote, not entirely RVS. There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser. Possible that Creature is buddying, I don't like how he talks about 'early town activity' or some shit like that as if he's trying to seem a part of it.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:47 pm
by Derek12
In post 59, atm487 wrote:VOTE: Crazycrab sheep
Nobody is voting crab right now.

Do you have any thoughts on the game?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:49 pm
by atm487
VOTE: Unvote Well no thoughts, just waiting for some people to present an arguement, and for more posts

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:51 pm
by Robbnva
In post 62, atm487 wrote:VOTE: Unvote Well no thoughts, just waiting for some people to present an arguement, and for more posts
There's serious votes on me and you don't have thoughts on that?

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:52 pm
by Robbnva
Also a serious vote on creature.

Btw that post about creature I agree with.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 2:55 pm
by atm487
well im not someone to judge early game

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:24 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 60, Smithereens wrote:First Thoughts: 'Damn 3 pages already this game is hella active'
*reads the game*
3 people engaged in small chat... :\


VOTE: Creature
Somewhat serious vote, not entirely RVS. There's absolutely no way you're getting a town read from the very first post a person makes in the game. If you could I'd just copy/paste that post everywhere I went as scum and you'd be none the wiser. Possible that Creature is buddying, I don't like how he talks about 'early town activity' or some shit like that as if he's trying to seem a part of it.
Idk what your and robbnva's problem is with early town reads is?? "Oh it can be easily faked", great? Like wow we have some weak town reads it isnt going to determine our read on someone for the entire game?
Everytime someone says someone is town read for *blank* I might as well say that it could be "easily faked". Assuming things are easily faked and that scum are playing optimally is stupid af and there is no point in even playing if everyone played optimally.
How many games exactly do you have across all of your alts, robbnva?
@Eggman I hate RQS and want to lynch all who use it because asking people what their favorite dessert is just lets scum hide by answering those pointless questions.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:30 pm
by Dwlee99
So Robbnva agrees we are out of rvs yet..
  1. Has trashed those with town reads
  2. Has no scum reads
nice

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:32 pm
by Dwlee99
Chores and then iso analysis of robbnva

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:38 pm
by Robbnva
In post 66, Dwlee99 wrote:How many games exactly do you have across all of your alts, robbnva?
About 135 give or take a couple.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:39 pm
by Robbnva
In post 67, Dwlee99 wrote:So Robbnva agrees we are out of rvs yet..
  1. Has trashed those with town reads
  2. Has no scum reads
nice
Nobody really should have either at this point. It's too early to get strong reads

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:41 pm
by Dwlee99
So you dont have any reads on
anyone
?
Not even
a little

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:41 pm
by Dwlee99
In post 69, Robbnva wrote:
In post 66, Dwlee99 wrote:How many games exactly do you have across all of your alts, robbnva?
About 135 give or take a couple.
dang

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:44 pm
by Robbnva
In post 71, Dwlee99 wrote:So you dont have any reads on
anyone
?
Not even
a little
Where do you get that idea? Pretty sure I've stated mild suspicion on 2 people already.

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 3:48 pm
by Dwlee99
I remember you saying that you had no scum reads?