Mafiascum.net

In post 47, Nero Cain wrote:Thor what do you think of Sable atm?

I
m actually pretty happy to sheep him because he was the first one out of the gate who actively tried to scumhunt.
Maybe it's scum just faking away.
Ockham says - if you see scumhunting, call it town.

In post 49, Elyse wrote:Michel seemed to be talking a big game and the sharp turn where he criticized his own wagon seemed off to me. It's not that he did it - it's that he did it after acting all confident.

I see no hypocrisy between pressing initial scumhunting as a town concept and also finding people questioning initial scumhunting as a scum concept.
In fact those combined stances seem to make a lot of sense together.
What am I missing?

Also, if Transcend thinks Michael is scummy, than no matter what Transcend's alignment, the reality is probably the opposite

What do you think of my Trancend vote?

Actually giving a reason why someone could be scum during AVS is a great way to get the game started, but it draws attention like crazy, particularly from weaker players who automatically seem to assume off-meta behaviour = scum. Not entirely sure what to think of Transcend here. I feel his reactions to me are more thoughtless then flat out scummy.

Blitzkrieg, if you feel selective replying is worth pointing out, then why are you conveniently ignoring the wagon on you and the discussion it sparked?

9/10 times any reason given in RVS will be a joke and I'm struggling with your logic that RVS votes with joke reasoning will start discussion. I mean its not like you responded to my RVS on you so why would you expect others to respond to a jokey RVS?

I feel like you've been ignoring me, what do you think of my vote on you?

Why should i care about it?

b/c Sable says that RVS votes start discussion!

I'm simply ambivalent lol

Why do you think I switch my vote to you?

In post 52, Nero Cain wrote:What do you think of my Trancend vote?

I think it's fine.

In post 53, MichelSableheart wrote:Actually giving a reason why someone could be scum during AVS is a great way to get the game started, but it draws attention like crazy, particularly from weaker players who automatically seem to assume off-meta behaviour = scum. Not entirely sure what to think of Transcend here. I feel his reactions to me are more thoughtless then flat out scummy.

Blitzkrieg, if you feel selective replying is worth pointing out, then why are you conveniently ignoring the wagon on you and the discussion it sparked?

I haven't ignored my own wagon. No player can comment on everything. If someone misses something they ought to observe, it is worth following up on.

My wagon was RVS, so I was letting things play out. What do people do after me? Does it match their personality? Who over justifies the vote? Right now, I am seeing pure RVS there and ignoring the wagon stood out more.

I FORGOT THIS STARTED LMFAO

VOTE: Shadow

I'm looking forward to playing with you!

^ Scum claim ^

Maria do you want to comment on the rest of the game? We are p much out of RVS.

In post 65, Transcend wrote:^ Scum claim ^

Shut up I already townread you now get in my pocket

Jar and Michael are early scumreads

Why is Trancend a town read?

In post 69, Nero Cain wrote:Why is Trancend a town read?

Meta.

In post 68, MariaR wrote:Jar and Michael are early scumreads

K yeah let's be power town again *hops in le pocket*

In post 71, Transcend wrote:

In post 68, MariaR wrote:Jar and Michael are early scumreads

K yeah let's be power town again *hops in le pocket*

YEEEE LETS GO
Okay time to share role pm's I flipped mafia sided sheriff you?

Why are you still RVSing with two scumreads?

In post 73, Nero Cain wrote:Why are you still RVSing with two scumreads?

Why are you so uptight with only 60 posts we're not even close to out of RVS stage