Mafiascum.net

You people really suck at reaction tests.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dunnstral

Bork, you can unshoo now.

In post 50, Syryana wrote:reaction tests.

So when you get called out, it's a reaction test?

In post 51, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 50, Syryana wrote:reaction tests.

So when you get called out, it's a reaction test?

syr this is semi what i expected, although not the conclusion, so follow up:

How was dunn's reaction so different from mine that you find him scummy and (presumably) not me

Votecount 1.2

Dunnstral

(2) - Shadow_step, Syryana

Seiko x Naomi

(1) - borkjerfkin

Not Voting

(6) - Dunnstral, Seiko x Naomi, Obvious Alt, Aj The Epic, Charloux, The Oxford Bubbles

With

9

players eligible to vote, it’s

5

to lynch!

Day 1 will end in

(expired on 2017-01-26 06:01:00).

Mod Notes:

None!

In post 47, Charloux wrote:Meh my current meta is getting a PR and being forced to claim D1 because i've been scummy. Kinda like a curse.

I'm inclined to believe this bit of pathos is genuine, considering this literally did just happen in a game I modded with him in it.

In post 20, Charloux wrote:Also, how likely do you guys think there is a 3rd faction in this game?

Curious as to why your mind immediately went here though.

I bet Syryana was trying to get Charloux quicklynched on a reason that only looks good!!! Mafia like hiding behind FAKE reasons to attack people cos they know if the reason sounds good they can vote innocent townies and noone will know!

And then when Dunnstral yells at him he posts a gif of an ugly man! I think he's scum trying to dodge the subject >:C He didn't even explain why he wanted Dunnstral lynched! I bet he moved his vote cos he couldn't hide behind his fake reason any more...

VOTE: Syryana

die! die! die!

- Bubbles

i think syr is probably town.

39 makes it pretty clear he's got a more oblique trajectory than what he is presenting, at least.

Wahaha! He might be mafia pretending to have an oblique trajectory so'd ya think he was town though! I don't trust weird words like that

- Bubbles

He might, but he was under essentially zero pressure (other than a really light 36 callout) at the point that he told me to vacate the thread, which leads me to believe he was legitimately more concerned about ensnaring someone at that time than having an escape route that I'd just gift him.

I mean [anyone] might be mafia pretending to [do thing i think is town] so that i'll townread them; that's not really a helpful way to approach the game

In post 56, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 20, Charloux wrote:Also, how likely do you guys think there is a 3rd faction in this game?

Curious as to why your mind immediately went here though.

I found the idea of a 3rd party interesting at the time so i couldn't contain myself and just had to ask.

Syryana's vote on Dun makes no sense to me, would like an explanation. And no, the "Lol your accusations are funny" attitude won't suffice.
Also, i always had trouble analyzing 2 person hydras. Now that there is a 3 person hydra with 3 distinctive personalities, i can just furrow my brows in annoyance. Didn't even know there could be 3 heads...

In post 57, The Oxford Bubbles wrote:I bet Syryana was trying to get Charloux quicklynched on a reason that only looks good!!! Mafia like hiding behind FAKE reasons to attack people cos they know if the reason sounds good they can vote innocent townies and noone will know!

Is this a posting schtick btw? Like you're trying to be a character?

I disagree with Bubbles about what Syryana was doing but I don't think his posting is genuine. He calls attention to what he did in post 50 and to my gut that doesn't sit right.

~ Raven

I feel you; i don't have an issue with it, as i said i think 39 made it pretty obvious that's what he was doing

do you know your hydra buddy well enough to answer 63 for them?

It's not a posting shtick.

~ Raven

that's unfortunate

back later

shtick shmtick

I write the way I talk!

Anywaysies bork, I looked at what ya said about oblique stuff. I gotta question - if you know that 36 meant he was trying to trap someone, wouldn't the peoples he was trying to trap know too? That's not a good trap at all! Aaaand, since he voted dunn, that must've mean dunn fell into his trap! But if that was the case he'd yell at dunn and go "you did this and fell into my trap, so you're mafia!" but he had no explanation at all. The way I see it, 34 makes suuper obvious that dunn thought anyone who bought into the charloux wagon was a bad person, so I'd think 39 was just a sneaky little get outta jail free in case Dunn went "hey, Sy!! you were on the scummy make-a-big-deal charloux wagon too!!"

- Bubbles!

(sorry I forgot to sign :s)

In post 53, borkjerfkin wrote:How was dunn's reaction so different from mine that you find him scummy and (presumably) not me

Notty's point was idiotic. (I love you notty but it's true). I immediately jumped on it for a couple of reasons. One, I wanted to see what would happen, e.g. who else jumped on, who called me out, etc. Two, I wanted to see what Charloux did with a little pressure. Results: Charloux = town, Dunn = explained below, Oxford is getting a squinty eyed glare from me.

Now, as to Dunn vs. you. I'm not finding Dunn scummy because he thought the Notty thing was silly. I'm voting him because of the following:

In post 46, Dunnstral wrote:Feel free to start an early wagon that isn't based off a disgusting misrep. You should be wagoning one of sekio and Syryana.

Where's the vote? Pretty strong words with nothing to back it up. Are disgusting misreps not scummy anymore? He even goes so far as to say who someone else should be wagoning. That's the part that really got me.

Answer your question, bork?

In post 69, The Oxford Bubbles wrote:f you know that 36 meant he was trying to trap someone, wouldn't the peoples he was trying to trap know too?

the quality of the trap isn't relevant; the intent is.

bubbles wrote:Aaaand, since he voted dunn, that must've mean dunn fell into his trap! But if that was the case he'd yell at dunn and go "you did this and fell into my trap, so you're mafia!" but he had no explanation at all.

that he didn't give one doesn't mean he doesn't have one; people decide not to be super transparent all the time. But you're right, only he can explain that.

bubbles wrote:The way I see it, 34 makes suuper obvious that dunn thought anyone who bought into the charloux wagon was a bad person, so I'd think 39 was just a sneaky little get outta jail free in case Dunn went "hey, Sy!! you were on the scummy make-a-big-deal charloux wagon too!!"

I believe that you genuinely believe this and am keeping the possibility of it in my mind; dollars to donuts I just don't agree.

p-edit: yep. townread stays. you might even have a point on dunn.

In post 71, Syryana wrote:Oxford is getting a squinty eyed glare from me.

I see a pretty believable trajectory from them

Also consider my vote serious now because why the fuck not