Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:05 am
Also Lighthaze, it does discuss it in the rules briefly but normally if you want the mod to correct something, just bold like so and point it out.In post 9, Lighthaze1135 wrote:wait a sec, i dont like that selflynch tbh, i think its scum claiming to be a role obviously not on here to make people think "jester isnt on here, im not lynching for that" thats just me though so UNVOTE: woodboys2339 and VOTE: TesXX
TBH if you weren't a beginner you'd be lynched for this (by me at least). What you did is kinda a combination of "fence-sitting" (aka not choosing a side) and "waffling" (choosing both sides/flipping around). It just shows a lack of dedicated opinion on what was happening.Woodboys2339 wrote:I'm mainly on the fence because of the chance of a PR. Then again... you did make the point of them claiming. so fine
VOTE: TesXX L-1
In post 33, Accountant wrote:Uhhhh you should vote Tes because you think there is a decent chance he is scum not because you want to play the odds.
TBH if you weren't a beginner you'd be lynched for this (by me at least). What you did is kinda a combination of "fence-sitting" (aka not choosing a side) and "waffling" (choosing both sides/flipping around). It just shows a lack of dedicated opinion on what was happening.[/quote]Woodboys2339 wrote:I'm mainly on the fence because of the chance of a PR. Then again... you did make the point of them claiming. so fine
VOTE: TesXX L-1
I did that after the VC was listed.. it'll be in the next VC thoughIn post 60, TesXX wrote:wait there's still a mistake it says woodboys hasn't unvoted
Who do you want to vote then? We have to get some kind of wagon going to push the game along, or it'll be stuck in limbo for all eternity. In my mind Tes is as good a wagon as anything else, especially given the reasons stated above.In post 48, Falco XV wrote:I mean you said their reasoning was bad, but that voting Tes was still a good idea regardless.
I'd rather hold off on Tes, at worse the Jester claim is NAI for me.
What for? o.oIn post 53, Aj The Epic wrote:Loopdan are we declaring mutiny on our IC?
Badly. It's one of the few puzzles I'm not particularly good at although it's more I've never studied how to do it correctly. To me, working through how a puzzle works is more fun than solving it for speed.In post 63, Woodboys2339 wrote:Little off topic, but couldn't help to notice.. AJ, do you cube?
Yes. But if you want to organize something official I'm always hereIn post 66, Loopdan wrote:I think he means because we are both voting you, but my vote is pure RVS.
Ah ok. I speedsolve so was just wonderingIn post 68, Aj The Epic wrote:Badly. It's one of the few puzzles I'm not particularly good at although it's more I've never studied how to do it correctly. To me, working through how a puzzle works is more fun than solving it for speed.In post 63, Woodboys2339 wrote:Little off topic, but couldn't help to notice.. AJ, do you cube?
Not Tes, that's for sure. The only reasoning to vote Tes, in my mind, is barely a justification for an SR.In post 64, Accountant wrote:Who do you want to vote then? We have to get some kind of wagon going to push the game along, or it'll be stuck in limbo for all eternity. In my mind Tes is as good a wagon as anything else, especially given the reasons stated above.In post 48, Falco XV wrote:I mean you said their reasoning was bad, but that voting Tes was still a good idea regardless.
I'd rather hold off on Tes, at worse the Jester claim is NAI for me.
i have an sr on bart the fart as well, but i think we should wait. though its probably unlikely, They just aren't available, or something along that, but if he continues to lurk, we should pressure himIn post 70, AceQueen wrote:@Loopdan I haven't even done anything! (Okay which is probably the point) but because I'm not a bitter person and honestly I haven't posted much so I can see why someone would want to get at least a little reaction out of me through a vote I'llvote: BartTheFartbecause they haven't said anything and also "Bart the Fart" really? That's the best you could do