Sid Meier's Civilization 5 UPick Mafia (GAME OVER)

[Shaziro]

Careful about reading into what you think are implications, Titus, remember Adventure Mafia!

[Titus]

Y'all honestly have no idea how good it feels to be in a game that I can keep checking on and actually see updates in. That said, ActionDan, mind explaining that one, or is it just rvs voting?

Do you have any thoughts or is this post just a waste of space itself? It's great you can give a compliment but how does this forward the game?

[ActionDan]

There is no town motivation for a quote wall on page 2.

Pedit. Same reasoning as titus.

[Chara]

was going to excitedly vote for Bujaber for his post on Elbirn, but it no longer feels original. :<

Titus, why are you so desperate for everyone to be posting content and only content on page 2? we've barely started and no one's really being spammy. your complaints take up as much space as what you're complaining about.

let's have a chill game.

VOTE: Bujaber anyway.

pedit: well alright then.

[Shaziro]

I’m asking for an explanation of a blank vote. I don’t see how that’s a waste of space, and I think it’s kinda silly you didn’t bother to comment on anyone else goofing around this early into the game but -do- complain that a post in which I actually ask a question is pointless.

In other words, find something else to complain about and don’t project.

[brassherald]

I didn't like Gamma's wall because I had to read too much... Liked it even less when I read it.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

[Shaziro]

I would like to propose an embassy with Chara’s chill nation. Really though what is the -scum- motivation for responding to posts in a big wall on page 2? What discussion was it distracting from? Saying “that doesn’t explicitly benefit town therefore scummy” is dumb at best and actually scummy at worst.

[Titus]

was going to excitedly vote for Bujaber for his post on Elbirn, but it no longer feels original. :<

Titus, why are you so desperate for everyone to be posting content and only content on page 2? we've barely started and no one's really being spammy. your complaints take up as much space as what you're complaining about.

let's have a chill game.

VOTE: Bujaber anyway.

pedit: well alright then.

being so close to a hostile neighbor who is insane and some would say as part of me prevents being chill. second, i don't care if content and only content but I don't want to see spam/non-sense that does nothing particularly while praising lack of spam or walling. Even jokes do something.

[Chara]

exactly what i was going to say, again. also to call those voting Gamma for it weak or scum. it's one, small wall. and a posting style.

i don't anything about Civ or politics Shaziro, but let's... do the embassy thing. friendly relations!

VOTE: brass

[Shaziro]

It’s got no mechanical effecti in this mafia game so far as I’m aware.

[ActionDan]

Don't care will still vote it. Take the cookie away from the mouse

[Chara]

being so close to a hostile neighbor who is insane and some would say as part of me prevents being chill. second, i don't care if content and only content but I don't want to see spam/non-sense that does nothing particularly while praising lack of spam or walling. Even jokes do something.

i don't think Shaziro's post was close to spam or nonsense.
but i really don't feel like arguing about something so petty, and i doubt it's AI.

pedit: i know there isn't a mechanical thing here, Shaziro. i just can't do the political/history word drop thing. disappointing.

Dan: i do love seeing players committed to a crusade against a particular behaviour, who don't care whether it's AI or not. that's always fun!
a little happier with my brass vote after that post, too. just a little.

[Titus]

Chara why do you seem so interested in defending Gamma?

I seek to place an embassy in Action Dan's country.

[Chara]

Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

[ActionDan]

a little happier with my brass vote after that post, too. just a little

strange. Why would my post affect you being comfortable with your vote.

[Chara]

i could tell you, but i feel as though you could figure it out. :>

[brassherald]

Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

I'm not following on it. I didn't like the post's content

[ActionDan]

i could tell you, but i feel as though you could figure it out. :>

Ok, out of the people voting gamma that you dislike I made a post that elevates your read on me to less bad.

[Titus]

Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

Dan's vote ninjaed my post for the same reason. All Gamma did was a filler wall. Does that make him lock scum 4ever? No. But I agree with Dan's approach and you seem paricularly close to Gamma by chainsawing all who don't like gamma. Don't know if it's AI but... :/

[Joey_]

Dear Titus,

You can objectively disagree with a line of thoughts used to discredit another Nation regardless of the identity of the discredited Nation, keep that in mind.

Kindly,
Prime Minister of ******

[Titus]

Dear Titus,

You can objectively disagree with a line of thoughts used to discredit another Nation regardless of the identity of the discredited Nation, keep that in mind.

Kindly,
Prime Minister of ******

Agreed. Shaizro for instance disagrees with the missive I sent to Germany. However, Shaizro does not attack me for the missive. That is what is puzzling about Chara. Chara seems particularly invested in protecting Gamma.

[Chara]

Dan: yes, actually.

brass: your timing did look like you were following it. what's scummy about the content?

pedit at Titus: that's really it. all he did was a filler wall. it's not an especially exciting bite. brass's vote was notable because it came after both you and Dan said you didn't like the post.

Joey: there's nothing objective about mafia. though, what exactly are you saying here?
also, why Varsoon?

[Chara]

Agreed. Shaizro for instance disagrees with the missive I sent to Germany. However, Shaizro does not attack me for the missive. That is what is puzzling about Chara. Chara seems particularly invested in protecting Gamma.

you think i'm attacking you? or are you referring to brass and Dan? i'm not scumreading Dan right now.

you are, again, shifting my presumed focus to Gamma. i really don't to spend the game arguing with you if you're town. it's very tiring and not fun.

[Gamma Emerald]

The German tanks are not subtle in their implications. The scholars wish to remind them that subtlety is the better form of valor at times. The rashness and impulsivity are not favored traits. If I picked up the implications then I doubt I am the only one that asks why you change your mind so erratically. I will see if I can work with you further without making the implications obvious.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Can we please avoid using words spuriously? Reading walls with no reads or point is very annoying.

I'm trying not to artificially inflate the thread when it's early-game.

There is no town motivation for a quote wall on page 2.

Pedit. Same reasoning as titus.

nope. I believe the start of a game is critically important to the rest of it so I'm trying to start it with less posts rather than more.

Chara why do you seem so interested in defending Gamma?

I seek to place an embassy in Action Dan's country.

True, why are you defending me so soon Chara? I haven't really posted anything that game-relevant yet.

Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

Okay so I'm essentially the background for this argument, nice, I always wanted to be a background

Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

Dan's vote ninjaed my post for the same reason. All Gamma did was a filler wall. Does that make him lock scum 4ever? No. But I agree with Dan's approach and you seem paricularly close to Gamma by chainsawing all who don't like gamma. Don't know if it's AI but... :/

I don't think they're chainsawing they seem to just think the idea is bad. If it was someone else they'd very likely take the same stance.

[Joey_]

Dear Titus,

I disagree. I believe Chara already explained that [It] disagree about the push based on the structure on the post, as showed here :

it's one, small wall. and a posting style.

Chara also showed similar behavior surrounding Shaziro post regarding your post, Chara used the same kind line of thoughts to critique the people who were discrediting Gamma :

i don't think Shaziro's post was close to spam or nonsense.
but i really don't feel like arguing about something so petty, and i doubt it's AI.

I believe that you might've missed that [It] also "chainsawed" Shaziro there because you were biased into thinking that [It] was engaged into defending Gamma.
Chara looks like a prudent Nation willing to denounce Nations who dislikes the structure of the correspondances and i believe, as of yet, it has nothing to do with "Chainsawing".

Kindly,
Prime Minister of ********