In post 45, RedFlavor wrote:Would mafia claim something like this this early?
Looks like they had a cleaner gambit in mind than what they attempted
How is this alignment indicative?
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:49 am
by Theta Alpine
In post 34, Nictis wrote:-snip-
This claim in general is leaving me baffled, I can only think of two possible reasons for it, one of which requires him to be a fool and the other is too convoluted. It doesn't make sense him to make such a... contradictory claim, especially given that there was no attention on him. So it gives me a pretty bad vibe, and has me frowning at him outing his buddy like that.
i can think of a third
he just made a joke claim
it has been a thing in my previous few games
enough of a thing that i deem it nai
RedFlavor wrote:Mafia only has daychat if they have encryptor, right?
yep
the rules state that mafia does not have daychat
therefore the only [may not be only] way mafia has daychat in this game is if they have an encryptor in their factional chat
[may not be the only way because if i remember correctly you can have a custom role in a normal and giving daychat to mafia would be allowed for such a role]
p-edit
Lil Uzi Vert wrote:-snip-
This sounds like bull.
Talk about your mafia experince a bit. How many games do you have under your belt?
6 or 7 on this account
this is in fact still a secret alt [for a given definition of secret] so i will not be telling you how many in total
anyways the whole point of rvs is so that people find the most random eccentric or silly reason to vote someone and then other people react to it
also it might be a bit early to say if someone is town or not
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:54 am
by Assemblerotws
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:07 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Well I don’t know if can’t buy that you’ve never seen someone naked vote in RVS. What’s wrong with the reactions to those again?
And I disagree with that being the purpose of RVS and for some reason I don’t believe you think that it is. The purpose of RVS is to get the game moving by catching the hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting. Focusing on someone not providing a reason for a vote in RVS doesn’t feel natural.
I agree with this, he has few games and his post with checks seem too pure to be scum. If mafla had daychat though, maybe I would think about it different but Im p sure that mafia only has a daychat when there is a encrptor, right?
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:11 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Mafia can have day chat without an encryptor.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:17 am
by RedFlavor
Oh well if its not confirmed, it could be a fake attempt that were coordinated from daychat but idk, it just seems too townie
Btw VOTE: nosferatu
His posts about rvs being random seems odd
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:32 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 44, TwoInAMillion wrote:I don't believe that Flavor Leaf is a Town Ascetic Miller Neighbor. Please don't fakeclaim.
i mentioned in my post that a custom role could give them day chat
however daychat would have to come from a role in this game
Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Well I don’t know if can’t buy that you’ve never seen someone naked vote in RVS. What’s wrong with the reactions to those again?
And I disagree with that being the purpose of RVS and for some reason I don’t believe you think that it is. The purpose of RVS is to get the game moving by catching the hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting. Focusing on someone not providing a reason for a vote in RVS doesn’t feel natural.
i have seen naked votes before
those are called votes with hidden reasons
the point i was making is that you do still have a reason to vote
you cannot claim to have no reason when you vote someone
i am perfectly fine with no stated reason
i am not fine with stating no reason at all
p-edit
flavor leaf
i think i have been in a game with you before
i may have to go look and see now
In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm gonna try something: for this I'm gonna lurk out the first irl day or so
Imma make this short and simple.
I'm in a neighborhood with Gamma Emerald. I'm an ascetic miller also. No other info will be given.
Ascetic Miller. That's... Interesting.
So if I'm reading this right and not mixing up terms, you're claiming to come up guilty to investigations, and that anyone who visits you will be roleblocked (Including investigators)
This is projecty and false advertising. I don’t really know what i mean when I say false advertising. But this is it.
VOTE: Nicitis
Basically, they’re saying exactly what is the “right” way of playing, and using it in terms of pushing without taking in facts otherwise.
I’m not strong on this, and I’ll likely change my mind next page, but I want to see where it goes. I need a better sense of who Nic is before I go too hard.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:38 am
by Theta Alpine
oh wait i remember now
i was in the game where you revealed who you were an alt of
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:39 am
by Flavor Leaf
@Theta - LOL. You’ve never played with this account. My bad.
It’s Boonskiies.
PEdit:
How does Theta forget me. I was her IC in her newbie game, and played in a good few of her early games on Boonskiies. I was quite loud.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:40 am
by Flavor Leaf
VOTE: Nictis
It didn’t go through
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:42 am
by Theta Alpine
and since now i know who it was that made the claim
i take back what i said about joke claim
it was definitely a gambit
not that it changes the fact that it is still nai
p-edit
i did play in large normal 206
the one where you outed flavor leaf as being your alt
you are at least supposed to have a reason in rvs
at least i think so
why would it be random voting then?
I played with Thor recently and he said RVS is really Low information voting stage rather than purely random
So his idea was no one is “truly” random, as in roll the dice and vote where it lands - most people pick some kind of bizarre reason to put whatever vote they choose
So in line with that principle, if gamma doesn’t want to play for an IRL day, let’s find out what he’s up to
Not a fan of this appeal to authority, but it's from a new player, so it's unfortunately null.
In post 35, Nictis wrote:I completely failed to respond to that post. Ascetic Miller isn't overkill for a fakeclaim, it's just wrong. "You can't visit me but if you could I would come up as scum," doesn't make sense.
Exactly. My guess is it's either Ascetic scum who didn't do the math or a troll role by the mod.
Reminds me of a memorable fakeMiller claim in DC vs Marvel that got me all the way to a flawless scumwin
Tip for next time, kid? Wait until everyone else has posted at least once, pretend you missed the game start, and then claim. Someone else claiming Miller can screw you right away.
In post 45, RedFlavor wrote:Would mafia claim something like this this early?
Worked for me, once upon a time. It's a solid scum strategy, if played right.
This is not playing it right.
-------
Later comments on Flavor Leaf having a pattern of screwing around makes me question all this, but I find Town fakeclaiming like this to be anti-Wincon, so a vote is warranted either way.