Page 3 of 92

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:30 am
by Firebringer
Hey flubbernugget how is it going?

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:35 am
by Beefster
Ascetic miller neighbor claim is probably a joke.

VOTE: Nictis

It's a chainsaw defense, but I'll roll with this for now.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:35 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Hey guys :)

What’s shaking?

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:39 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 7, Pine wrote:VOTE: Firebringer

Hai :D
In post 513, Andrius wrote:This is now the Pine Appreciation Thread.

I'm clearly not the only one who missed you!

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:40 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 21, Theta Alpine wrote:hey all

VOTE: beefster

you are at least supposed to have a reason in rvs
at least i think so
This sounds like bull.

Talk about your mafia experince a bit. How many games do you have under your belt?

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:42 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Nictis is town.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:46 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 41, profii wrote:
In post 40, northsidegal wrote:i have something to say but i'm waiting to say it.
You are romantically involved with one of the other players in the game?

:o
Image

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:48 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 48, Archwing wrote:lmao. y'all never played with boon yet have you?

wait for his 5th or 6th claim before you jump on his back.
This.

He loves doing this shit to rile people up and get reactions.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:49 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
In post 49, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 45, RedFlavor wrote:Would mafia claim something like this this early?
Looks like they had a cleaner gambit in mind than what they attempted
How is this alignment indicative?

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:49 am
by Theta Alpine
In post 34, Nictis wrote:-snip-
This claim in general is leaving me baffled, I can only think of two possible reasons for it, one of which requires him to be a fool and the other is too convoluted. It doesn't make sense him to make such a... contradictory claim, especially given that there was no attention on him. So it gives me a pretty bad vibe, and has me frowning at him outing his buddy like that.
i can think of a third
he just made a joke claim

it has been a thing in my previous few games
enough of a thing that i deem it nai
RedFlavor wrote:Mafia only has daychat if they have encryptor, right?
yep
the rules state that mafia does not have daychat
therefore the only [may not be only] way mafia has daychat in this game is if they have an encryptor in their factional chat

[may not be the only way because if i remember correctly you can have a custom role in a normal and giving daychat to mafia would be allowed for such a role]

p-edit
Lil Uzi Vert wrote:-snip-
This sounds like bull.

Talk about your mafia experince a bit. How many games do you have under your belt?
6 or 7 on this account
this is in fact still a secret alt [for a given definition of secret] so i will not be telling you how many in total

anyways the whole point of rvs is so that people find the most random eccentric or silly reason to vote someone and then other people react to it

also it might be a bit early to say if someone is town or not

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:54 am
by Assemblerotws
Vote Count 1.02


Not Voting [9]:
PeregrineV, Egg, UC Voyager, Archwing, Luca Blight, Gamma Emerald, Lil Uzi Vert, Inferno390, Firebringer
Flavor Leaf [3]:
Nictis, Flubbernugget, TwoInAMillion
Gamma Emerald [2]:
Pine, profii
Nictis [2]:
northsidegal, Beefster
UC Voyager [1]:
Nosferatu
Lil Uzi Vert [1]:
RedFlavor
Beefster [1]:
Theta Alpine
RedFlavor [1]:
Flavor Leaf


With
20
alive, it takes
11
to lynch. At deadline, Flavor Leaf would be lynched.

Day ends in (expired on 2018-04-12 21:00:00) on
April 12, 2018
.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:07 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Well I don’t know if can’t buy that you’ve never seen someone naked vote in RVS. What’s wrong with the reactions to those again?

And I disagree with that being the purpose of RVS and for some reason I don’t believe you think that it is. The purpose of RVS is to get the game moving by catching the hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting. Focusing on someone not providing a reason for a vote in RVS doesn’t feel natural.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:09 am
by RedFlavor
In post 55, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Nictis is town.
I agree with this, he has few games and his post with checks seem too pure to be scum. If mafla had daychat though, maybe I would think about it different but Im p sure that mafia only has a daychat when there is a encrptor, right?

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:11 am
by Lil Uzi Vert
Mafia can have day chat without an encryptor.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:17 am
by RedFlavor
Oh well if its not confirmed, it could be a fake attempt that were coordinated from daychat but idk, it just seems too townie

Btw VOTE: nosferatu

His posts about rvs being random seems odd

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:32 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 44, TwoInAMillion wrote:I don't believe that Flavor Leaf is a Town Ascetic Miller Neighbor. Please don't fakeclaim.

VOTE: Vote: Flavor Leaf
Soul reading this as town.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:33 am
by Flavor Leaf
Gasp! My Theta Alpine is in this game! *shrieks*

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:34 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 43, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: flavor leaf
NAI to me. Flubber would makes vote as both alignments.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:36 am
by Theta Alpine
In post 63, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Mafia can have day chat without an encryptor.
well yes

i mentioned in my post that a custom role could give them day chat
however daychat would have to come from a role in this game
Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Well I don’t know if can’t buy that you’ve never seen someone naked vote in RVS. What’s wrong with the reactions to those again?

And I disagree with that being the purpose of RVS and for some reason I don’t believe you think that it is. The purpose of RVS is to get the game moving by catching the hidden motives couched in the jokes and the shit posting. Focusing on someone not providing a reason for a vote in RVS doesn’t feel natural.
i have seen naked votes before
those are called votes with hidden reasons
the point i was making is that you do still have a reason to vote
you cannot claim to have no reason when you vote someone

i am perfectly fine with no stated reason
i am not fine with stating no reason at all

p-edit
flavor leaf
i think i have been in a game with you before
i may have to go look and see now

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:38 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 32, Nictis wrote:
In post 27, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 19, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm gonna try something: for this I'm gonna lurk out the first irl day or so

Imma make this short and simple.

I'm in a neighborhood with Gamma Emerald. I'm an ascetic miller also. No other info will be given.
Ascetic Miller. That's... Interesting.

So if I'm reading this right and not mixing up terms, you're claiming to come up guilty to investigations, and that anyone who visits you will be roleblocked (Including investigators)
and
you are sharing a chat with someone.

So... Why shouldn't I think you're mafia here?
VOTE: Flavor Leaf

This is projecty and false advertising. I don’t really know what i mean when I say false advertising. But this is it.

VOTE: Nicitis

Basically, they’re saying exactly what is the “right” way of playing, and using it in terms of pushing without taking in facts otherwise.

I’m not strong on this, and I’ll likely change my mind next page, but I want to see where it goes. I need a better sense of who Nic is before I go too hard.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:38 am
by Theta Alpine
oh wait i remember now
i was in the game where you revealed who you were an alt of

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:39 am
by Flavor Leaf
@Theta - LOL. You’ve never played with this account. My bad.

It’s Boonskiies.:)



PEdit:

How does Theta forget me. I was her IC in her newbie game, and played in a good few of her early games on Boonskiies. I was quite loud.

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:40 am
by Flavor Leaf
VOTE: Nictis

It didn’t go through

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:42 am
by Theta Alpine
and since now i know who it was that made the claim

i take back what i said about joke claim

it was definitely a gambit
not that it changes the fact that it is still nai

p-edit
i did play in large normal 206
the one where you outed flavor leaf as being your alt

Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:44 am
by Pine
In post 25, profii wrote:
In post 23, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 21, Theta Alpine wrote:hey all

VOTE: beefster

you are at least supposed to have a reason in rvs
at least i think so
why would it be random voting then?
I played with Thor recently and he said RVS is really Low information voting stage rather than purely random

So his idea was no one is “truly” random, as in roll the dice and vote where it lands - most people pick some kind of bizarre reason to put whatever vote they choose

So in line with that principle, if gamma doesn’t want to play for an IRL day, let’s find out what he’s up to :evil:
Not a fan of this appeal to authority, but it's from a new player, so it's unfortunately null.
In post 35, Nictis wrote:I completely failed to respond to that post. Ascetic Miller isn't overkill for a fakeclaim, it's just wrong. "You can't visit me but if you could I would come up as scum," doesn't make sense.
Exactly. My guess is it's either Ascetic scum who didn't do the math or a troll role by the mod.

Reminds me of a memorable fakeMiller claim in DC vs Marvel that got me all the way to a flawless scumwin :cool:

Tip for next time, kid? Wait until everyone else has posted at least once, pretend you missed the game start, and then claim. Someone else claiming Miller can screw you right away.
In post 45, RedFlavor wrote:Would mafia claim something like this this early?
Worked for me, once upon a time. It's a solid scum strategy, if played right.

This is not playing it right.

-------

Later comments on Flavor Leaf having a pattern of screwing around makes me question all this, but I find Town fakeclaiming like this to be anti-Wincon, so a vote is warranted either way.

VOTE: Flavor Leaf