Mafiascum.net

Wiki says all revealed innocent children would be "immediately" dayvigged. Not on claim but on reveal.

In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.

Wait, do you really think he accidentally showed his true face for a moment?

It's possible that he's scum pretending to be town messing around, but I'm not feeling that either.

In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.

predit: you might want to read it again. that's not how compulsive child killer is meant to work afaik

What happens if an IC is revealed later on and they immediately get dayvigged by shortaru? Would that not be verification?

Hmm never mind I just looked at the role list and there's a one-shot mafia dayvig.

It's unlikely an IC is in the game, but if you're worried about that: shortaru, can you post in-thread?

In post 49, Micc wrote:does your role PM indicate how people fake revealing as IC are handled? 45 seems to indicate you would still day vig them.

It does not, but that's a strange assumption.

In post 54, Bicephalous Bob wrote:It's unlikely an IC is in the game, but if you're worried about that: shortaru, can you post

kill: shortaru

in-thread?

And if self-vig is not allowed:



Anymore questions?

In post 56, shortaru wrote:

In post 54, Bicephalous Bob wrote:It's unlikely an IC is in the game, but if you're worried about that: shortaru, can you post

kill: shortaru

in-thread?

kill: shortaru

And if self-vig is not allowed:

kill: Bicephelous Bob

Anymore questions?

Oops:



In case there's concern about misspell shenanigans.

In post 51, Bicephalous Bob wrote:

In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.

Wait, do you really think he accidentally showed his true face for a moment?

It's possible that he's scum pretending to be town messing around, but I'm not feeling that either.

idk maybe. I know my first thought would have been "I hope he's reaction testing" not "I hope he just got himself killed cause he deserves it". I think its more worthy of a wagon than anything else I've seen so far.

In post 52, Simeon wrote:

In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.

predit: you might want to read it again. that's not how compulsive child killer is meant to work afaik

What happens if an IC is revealed later on and they immediately get dayvigged by shortaru? Would that not be verification?

That's the one way to verify the child killer that I can think of without killing them. I don't think it's a particularly good solution for obvious reasons. I also don't know what a mafia day vig has to do with anything.

In post 55, shortaru wrote:

In post 49, Micc wrote:does your role PM indicate how people fake revealing as IC are handled? 45 seems to indicate you would still day vig them.

It does not, but that's a strange assumption.

I mean, that's how I took your post 45 so I'm glad you see why I though it was strange.

do those day vig shots mean you are retracting your earlier claim?

In post 59, Micc wrote:do those day vig shots mean you are retracting your earlier claim?

Nope. They mean I'm addressing concerns about my claim.

In post 58, Micc wrote:I mean, that's how I took your post 45 so I'm glad you see why I though it was strange.

Considering I kill children compulsively, I doubt I even have to submit the command.

I think the mod will likely kill it upon reveal.

In post 58, Micc wrote:I know my first thought would have been "I hope he's reaction testing" not "I hope he just got himself killed cause he deserves it".

Its true, though.

I get spiteful when people undermine what I'm trying to do.

I guess that's the real question then. What are you trying to do?

In post 63, Micc wrote:I guess that's the real question then. What are you trying to do?

Avoid killing the IC.

Which, if that claim has been real, would have been resoundingly undermined.

Is this not basic?

In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.

predit: you might want to read it again. that's not how compulsive child killer is meant to work afaik

On Pokémon Showdown mafia where I played a lot of Greater Idea, CCK triggers the moment IC reveals.

In post 54, Bicephalous Bob wrote:It's unlikely an IC is in the game, but if you're worried about that: shortaru, can you post

kill: shortaru

in-thread?

I don’t like this, see? Feels a bit twisted in motivation.
VOTE: Bicephalous Bob

In post 59, Micc wrote:do those day vig shots mean you are retracting your earlier claim?

VOTE: Micc

I mean, the post where I put in the requested kill order (and a backup in case there were questions) has the post that asked me to do that very thing quoted right in it.

In post 66, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 54, Bicephalous Bob wrote:It's unlikely an IC is in the game, but if you're worried about that: shortaru, can you post

kill: shortaru

in-thread?

I don’t like this, see? Feels a bit twisted in motivation.
VOTE: Bicephalous Bob

Not as twisted as Micc's specious push.

Bob was preempting the possibility of me being a fake-claiming Mafia dayvig. I got why he wanted me to do that.

Micc acting like he didn't understand my kill order, however... that makes no sense at all.

no I was just actually lost.

the purpose of bob's post 54 went completely over my head specifically because I know how childkiller works and the idea of a mafia day vig using it as a fake claim after they actively shoot an IC claim never crossed my mind. I didn't even realize the dayvig shots were by request and not of his own making.

i'll be back tomorrow. I need sleep.

I guess that logic works. Don’t think I’m gonna let that go forever, though, see? I’ll keep it in mind.

In post 69, Micc wrote:no I was just actually lost.

the purpose of bob's post 54 went completely over my head specifically because I know how childkiller works and the idea of a mafia day vig using it as a fake claim after they actively shoot an IC claim never crossed my mind. I didn't even realize the dayvig shots were by request and not of his own making.

i'll be back tomorrow. I need sleep.

I've certainly been there.

UNVOTE: Micc

24, 26, 29

I don't like the feel of these posts. Since nothing else has caught my attention yet,

VOTE: Tazaro

Didnt read the past 10 posts but mic is being opportunistic on page 2

Maybe you should read the past ten posts.

In post 72, Maruchan wrote:Didnt read the past 10 posts but mic is being opportunistic on page 2

How do ya even skip 10 measly posts?