Mafiascum.net

In post 48, Leodanny wrote:

In post 45, Creature wrote:

In post 31, Leodanny wrote:Kaythanks, but why?

In post 27, YyottaCat wrote:Wow is there seriously more than four scums in this game?

In post 28, Leodanny wrote:I hope not.

I think you derped here.

What do you mean?

Obviously there wouldn't have more than four scum-aligned players in a 13-players mini, it wouldn't be normal.

The way you responded is unlikely to come from scum.

Well, thanks. Now, do you see Suka as a Scum just hopping on wagons, or something else? Because when I checked the ISO, there were just two votes, nothing else.

VOTE: Oka Poka
Very fine with this.

In post 51, Creature wrote:

In post 48, Leodanny wrote:

In post 45, Creature wrote:

In post 31, Leodanny wrote:Kaythanks, but why?

In post 27, YyottaCat wrote:Wow is there seriously more than four scums in this game?

In post 28, Leodanny wrote:I hope not.

I think you derped here.

What do you mean?

OBVIOUSLY I don't have access to scum chat. OBVIOUSLY. Guys, look at me OBVIOUSLY not scum.
Not buying it.

VOTE: Leodanny

More votes on Oka, please!

In post 51, Creature wrote:

In post 48, Leodanny wrote:

In post 45, Creature wrote:

In post 31, Leodanny wrote:Kaythanks, but why?

In post 27, YyottaCat wrote:Wow is there seriously more than four scums in this game?

In post 28, Leodanny wrote:I hope not.

I think you derped here.

What do you mean?

Obviously there wouldn't have more than four scum-aligned players in a 13-players mini, it wouldn't be normal.

The way you responded is unlikely to come from scum.

This is dumb.

My vote stands.

Which part?

Creature's response to your quip.

Suka are you true newbie?

wow scum trying to move people off the mbaki wagon imo

smh my head

even if you think my wall post is a disaster and my ideas suck could u all still respond to it tho

thanks

In post 38, OkaPoka wrote:If everyone is willing to answer my questions and a serious version of RQS

What RQS questions are you proposing then?

I want to first go with the why do you like RVS over RQS and what fundamental beliefs led you to that. Then we can go deeper.

This is not a theory thread.

There is already lots of content in this game you can form reads off of.

There have been multiple wagons and people shifting wagons.

I want to first go with the why do you like RVS over RQS and what fundamental beliefs led you to that. Then we can go deeper.

This does not help anybody garner reads in this game.

Responding to it does nothing because .

Thank you, next.

Understanding the fundamental way people think about the game is one way to get to know how they play though?

For example, here's something I believe.

I know for a fact that I'm not the best at scumhunting, especially early on when a lot we have to do is tonereading and stuff like that. So it contributes to my belief that day 1 should be used to lynch people that are troll-y and harm the scumhunting environment.

Whatever, if you don't want to play my game, I guess you don't have to. But it can't hurt to humor me right? Like what if this is the optimal way to play day 1? Unless you've played a game in which this went down poorly, then in which case I'm interested in reading that game.

I'm with mbaki on this.
If you want to have a theory thread, do that in General Mafia Discussion.
Otherwise, please engage with the game at hand.
The more you give excuses not to, the more suspicious it makes me of you.

If you want to establish some baseline to read players from, look at their previous games. Asking them, in a game thread, to answer one way, allows them to be duplicitous in their responses and stay consistent with the self they want to project, meaning that it's likely a useless endeavor.

Even if you understood my fundamental means of thinking of the game, I don't think that would help you solve my alignment, as my play is vastly different based on role, players present, and other contexts.

Walls suck.

I am engaging with the game?

whatever

ill tone it down

its just frustrating because I get criticized for messy/spontaneous play but as soon as I try and get a bit neater with it people don't like it

but if its raw, unfiltered okapoka u want i guess u can have.

VOTE: Suka

Answer my question. Are you a newb or not?

In post 68, Suka wrote:Walls suck.

Engagement level = high

Leodanny wrote:I want both

I took your "I hope not" as genuinely hoping there aren't four scum. I think you're probably too new to have faked that.

___________

Oka, if you ask questions, I'll humor you. I don't recall a time RQS worked better than RVS, but we've already pretty much had any RVS we're going to so I don't think it can hurt. Do you have any opinions on anyone yet?

Nero wrote:Can we lynch VOTE: Suka now?

Meh, wouldn't be the worst vote.

rb wrote:wow scum trying to move people off the mbaki wagon imo

smh my head

Who specifically do you mean?

-