What did you expect? We literally only have two pages to go off of, and we just got out of RVS.
Not really. I still think he’s neutral for now, given that he only has posted in RVS.In post 49, singletonking wrote:@Jumble does Soda's experience of Mafia affect your read on him?
How dare you.In post 48, singletonking wrote:Ugh whatever I'm going to tryhard now
Ceejay I actually have a semi-decent townread on because I appreciate his efforts to scumhunt in 38, and backing up with reasoning in 45. However, I'm actually double guessing myself on this read here because I know ceejay isn't usually this towny early game.
GulityLion I'm not actually townreading him as much as I stated but still leans more town than scum for me.
Not_Mafia has only one post but I'm actually slightly sussing him for it, I feel the use of punctuation and capitals is uncharacteristic of him.
Jumble I actually slightly scumread unrelated to GuiltyLion, idk why but 41 pings me, the experience thing just feels off
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
Suka has 1 naked RVS vote but it puts ceejay at L-2 so I do kinda dislike this
pirate mollie while being one of highest posters (!) has not much in content, but I think this is still NAI for now. Some posts I find awkward but 36 did mirror my thoughts
Gamma Emerald I also have no clue
I am just going to focus on the read you have on me for rnIn post 48, singletonking wrote:Ugh whatever I'm going to tryhard now
Ceejay I actually have a semi-decent townread on because I appreciate his efforts to scumhunt in 38, and backing up with reasoning in 45. However, I'm actually double guessing myself on this read here because I know ceejay isn't usually this towny early game.
GulityLion I'm not actually townreading him as much as I stated but still leans more town than scum for me.
Not_Mafia has only one post but I'm actually slightly sussing him for it, I feel the use of punctuation and capitals is uncharacteristic of him.
Jumble I actually slightly scumread unrelated to GuiltyLion, idk why but 41 pings me, the experience thing just feels off
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
Suka has 1 naked RVS vote but it puts ceejay at L-2 so I do kinda dislike this
pirate mollie while being one of highest posters (!) has not much in content, but I think this is still NAI for now. Some posts I find awkward but 36 did mirror my thoughts
Gamma Emerald I also have no clue
that is calledIn post 49, singletonking wrote:That... was a lot more inconclusive than I wanted it to be
Alright, I'll ask some questions to put this game forward:
@Gamma what did you not like about GL's response? And were you referring to his response to me or to Jumble?
@mollie why did you find it important to say that your "hi" was directed at me?
@Ceejay why were you not a fan of Soda's OMGUS as an RVS vote?
@Not_Mafia are you scum?
@Jumble does Soda's experience of Mafia affect your read on him?
If it was just “because I said so” it’s be fineIn post 36, pirate mollie wrote:gamma why did you not like gl's response?
will you plz unpack this for me? because I am not really sure that I understand what you are sayingIn post 56, Gamma Emerald wrote:If it was just “because I said so” it’s be fineIn post 36, pirate mollie wrote:gamma why did you not like gl's response?
He’s cushioning it with too many words thoug
In this post specifically: had he written just the first line I’d have pretty much disregarded this. Him writing the rest just feels rather self-conscious.In post 21, GuiltyLion wrote:cause I asked them to!In post 19, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Why would anyone follow you if they don't know what you're talking about?
I can't answer for why people would follow me or notyou'd have to ask my hypothetical followers that question
ceej you're gonna have to give more on this - what are you "not a big fan of" about this post:In post 38, ceejayvinoya wrote:Also not a big fan of Soda's omgus, but it could be a newbie thing so ok
I really don't see how this tips the scales at all regarding his alignment. Town or scum could have written this. Why do you think this is something that could be more likely to come from scum?
alright, the time has come then! I didn't like how he entered the game with four players already being voted and decided to put his RVS vote on a fifth player. Could be someone too afraid to make waves by putting a second vote on someone.In post 59, pirate mollie wrote:@guilty lion- I anxiously await for you to expand on your "scumtell"
nah that's my way of trying to get more out of Jumble. And what do you think of how he responded to me?In post 61, Gamma Emerald wrote:@MollieIn this post specifically: had he written just the first line I’d have pretty much disregarded this. Him writing the rest just feels rather self-conscious.In post 21, GuiltyLion wrote:cause I asked them to!In post 19, NotAJumbleOfNumbers wrote:Why would anyone follow you if they don't know what you're talking about?
I can't answer for why people would follow me or not
Hello thereIn post 59, pirate mollie wrote:@not mafia - hi!
The post looked awkwardly written to me, it didn't look much like an rvs nor is it a post that scumhunts.In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:ceej you're gonna have to give more on this - what are you "not a big fan of" about this post:In post 38, ceejayvinoya wrote:Also not a big fan of Soda's omgus, but it could be a newbie thing so okI really don't see how this tips the scales at all regarding his alignment. Town or scum could have written this. Why do you think this is something that could be more likely to come from scum?
Not really. I was a bit miffed at mollie’s “5 post combo”, but I don’t think that says anything. Like I said before, it’s a bit early to have any substantial reads.In post 51, singletonking wrote:Yeah pretty much, and even the saying that we have gotten out of RVS is debatable. I really needed to find something to get the game going
Is there anyone you have a slight scumlean on?
Actually the only post I saw as awkward was the one where you felt the need to specify that your 'hi' was directed at me.In post 54, pirate mollie wrote:see, I knew if I picked a fight with some1 things get interesting.
I am just going to focus on the read you have on me for rnIn post 48, singletonking wrote:Ugh whatever I'm going to tryhard now
Ceejay I actually have a semi-decent townread on because I appreciate his efforts to scumhunt in 38, and backing up with reasoning in 45. However, I'm actually double guessing myself on this read here because I know ceejay isn't usually this towny early game.
GulityLion I'm not actually townreading him as much as I stated but still leans more town than scum for me.
Not_Mafia has only one post but I'm actually slightly sussing him for it, I feel the use of punctuation and capitals is uncharacteristic of him.
Jumble I actually slightly scumread unrelated to GuiltyLion, idk why but 41 pings me, the experience thing just feels off
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
Suka has 1 naked RVS vote but it puts ceejay at L-2 so I do kinda dislike this
pirate mollie while being one of highest posters (!) has not much in content, but I think this is still NAI for now. Some posts I find awkward but 36 did mirror my thoughts
Gamma Emerald I also have no clue
so which post(s) do you find awkward? what is awkward about them?
the only thing that really stands out in this readslist is that this:
InfiniteSoda I don't really see anything wrong with him
so what exactly isrightwith soda person?
catching up as I go
Yeah I can sheep this, I can see Mollie as townIn post 57, Gamma Emerald wrote:Kinda liking mollie for town rn
Ok I'm definitely not going to follow you on this one, I disagree town won't necessary do what you described, and furthermore 5 is quite an arbitrary number. Do you have statistal evidence backing this up?In post 63, GuiltyLion wrote:alright, the time has come then! I didn't like how he entered the game with four players already being voted and decided to put his RVS vote on a fifth player. Could be someone too afraid to make waves by putting a second vote on someone.
five isn't arbitrary, it's more than half.In post 72, singletonking wrote:furthermore 5 is quite an arbitrary number.
nope! take it as it is. at this point I'm more concerned anyway with how he hasn't done anything other than argue with my initial vote on himIn post 72, singletonking wrote:Do you have statistal evidence backing this up?
