Mafiascum.net

eh idk i like it, gets us right out of rvs
i just have a personal tic with people making reachy cases against me
it probably shows up in my meta

In post 23, Eyes without a face wrote:VOTE: FallenDown

Please get am avi

Hey guys, did no one look at the reason for my vote? Second vote on obvious lynchbait player, cast for a deniable reason. Scummiest thing in the game so far.

No cookies/townpoints for anyone.

In post 31, mcqueen wrote:

In post 29, Lovebird wrote:

In post 26, mcqueen wrote:

In post 25, Lovebird wrote:Hm, I think maybe Reaper and Eyes are towny.

why? Btw I love your name and avatar

Thanks

You’re welcome I’d kinda like an answer to the question tho. What makes these two players towny when we have about a page to go off of?

I'll say if you say why you want to know.

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.

How is it stupid?

In post 53, Lovebird wrote:

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.

How is it stupid?

^
if its stupid as town, wouldnt that make it stupid as scum too?

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:

In post 34, mcqueen wrote:

In post 33, BuJaber wrote:

In post 32, BuJaber wrote:To hell with complexity..

VOTE: Clemency

Because that claim feels wrong. Simple as that.

Actually I don't know, flubber's might be worse.

am i overcomplicating it? i thought flubber’s was a joke, but any backup bus driver is effectively a vt until/if they become the bus driver

Correct. I was the one overcomplicating it in my head. It didn't need complication. The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.

In post 38, rb wrote:it's an obvious joke as well

No doubt. But I'm saying scum in this case it is a joke from scum.

I'd be surprised if they were partners and both decided to make such a joke. But I don't know which if them would be the scum and which the annoying townie.

wow ur a serious guy imo

In post 54, Lovebird wrote:VOTE: Akarin

VOTE: Akarin

still sheeping lovebird

No if it is conceivable that town would do something and scum do it, it's not stupid by scum.

I'm not saying never joke, but joke claims are distracting at best and nefarious at worst. Unfortunately they'll never go away, because town continue to do so. It's stupid because it doesn't move the game forward but it makes other townies forced to think about it and analyze it. It also continues to give scum this out. "Let's make dumb claim jokes because town do it"

So congratulations to whichever one of you is scum. You just assimilated yourself to the majority.

Lovebird please be town. I'm tired of being the only townie that scumreads you. (So far you're not scummy ftr)

In post 49, Eyes without a face wrote:Are we really pushing people for making obvious jokes on page 1?

Why slow down the noose of progress? VOTE: Eyes without a face

In post 58, BuJaber wrote:No if it is conceivable that town would do something and scum do it, it's not stupid by scum.

I'm not saying never joke, but joke claims are distracting at best and nefarious at worst. Unfortunately they'll never go away, because town continue to do so. It's stupid because it doesn't move the game forward but it makes other townies forced to think about it and analyze it. It also continues to give scum this out. "Let's make dumb claim jokes because town do it"

So congratulations to whichever one of you is scum. You just assimilated yourself to the majority.

"oh man, is he really a bus??
there's just no way to know in this open setup"

Obviously I know you're not a bus. I play more opens than closed I know how they work.

It's that someone like me is gonna stop at that post and think "why is he claiming this".

And yes other people can choose to play differently and ignore something like that. I don't enjoy making games harder than they should be.

Joke as town. Joke as scum. It's a game, it should be fun. But to joke and then expect people not to use that joke as part of the collective ISO of someone when forming reads?? Horrible perspective.

um

it's just NAI

I'm not sure if Clemency is evil or not, but BuJaber seems like a town member for doubting Clemency's claim.

Akarin wrote:

In post 23, Eyes without a face wrote:VOTE: FallenDown

Please get am avi

Hey guys, did no one look at the reason for my vote? Second vote on obvious lynchbait player, cast for a deniable reason. Scummiest thing in the game so far.

No cookies/townpoints for anyone.

My vote for Clemency was meant as a joke. Is it frowned upon?
Also I'm sorry... I was a little busy yesterday. Will get on this right now.

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:I'd be surprised if they were partners and both decided to make such a joke. But I don't know which if them would be the scum and which the annoying townie.

I think that both of them being evil is unlikely, since if one of them turns out to be evil, the other would be suspicious almost immediately. Though, if one of them is evil, I think Flubber would be the one because of his early claim which he could use as an excuse later.
Am I trying to read into this too much?

In post 51, Akarin wrote:

In post 23, Eyes without a face wrote:VOTE: FallenDown

Please get am avi

Hey guys, did no one look at the reason for my vote? Second vote on obvious lynchbait player, cast for a deniable reason. Scummiest thing in the game so far.

No cookies/townpoints for anyone.

Well to me I thought it was an RVS vote and the comment was separate.
Like she chose to vote for fallen, and also told them to get an avatar. Not that she voted fallen she didn't have an avatar.

sup nerds

I'm hardclaiming name and role:

In post 18, Sashaddin wrote:Setup looks nice. First open game for me.

VOTE: Clemency

scummiest entrance

VOTE: SASHADDDDIN

In post 55, Clemency wrote:

In post 53, Lovebird wrote:

In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.

How is it stupid?

^
if its stupid as town, wouldnt that make it stupid as scum too?

Can we get a response to this, lovebird? If you are town, it would be more likely for you to ask questions about why the claim is more likely to be from scum than how it is stupid.

In post 60, Eliot Ness wrote:

In post 49, Eyes without a face wrote:Are we really pushing people for making obvious jokes on page 1?

Why slow down the noose of progress? VOTE: Eyes without a face

^^Scum post/vote. Finding a reason to join a building wagon. Couldn't find anything but a rephrase of what 2 others already brought up.

VOTE: Eliot Ness

Waiting for the team to vote me for OMGUS.

In post 66, BuJaber wrote:

In post 51, Akarin wrote:

In post 23, Eyes without a face wrote:VOTE: FallenDown

Please get am avi

Hey guys, did no one look at the reason for my vote? Second vote on obvious lynchbait player, cast for a deniable reason. Scummiest thing in the game so far.

No cookies/townpoints for anyone.

Well to me I thought it was an RVS vote and the comment was separate.
Like she chose to vote for fallen, and also told them to get an avatar. Not that she voted fallen

because

she didn't have an avatar.

1. She's a he
2. It was indeed an RVS
3. The reason for the RVS was indeed that she had no avi
4. Combining 2 + 3 yields: I wanted to place a RVS vote. I checked the players and one that had posted had no avi. I decided to use my RVS vote to grab her attention and request that she gets one.
5. Thank you for your consideration

In post 64, FallenDown wrote: My vote for Clemency was meant as a joke. Is it frowned upon?

I mean, whether or not jokes are frowned upon is the topic of the debate going on right now, but I don't think so. I'm not voting for you, I'm voting for Eyes for voting for you.

In post 66, BuJaber wrote: Well to me I thought it was an RVS vote and the comment was separate.
Like she chose to vote for fallen, and also told them to get an avatar. Not that she voted fallen

because

she didn't have an avatar.

It doesn't matter if you are right about this or not though. "It was RVS" isn't like a less-deniable reason for jumping on the lynchbait wagon.