Mafiascum.net

OK you can have some town points. I see what you mean

In post 13, xRECKONERx wrote:VOTE: ankamius

hello old friend

In post 14, xRECKONERx wrote:wait nvm how could i be so stupid

VOTE: brigitte

This pings town

In post 15, tris wrote:Why the change of mind?

So this pings scum

In post 41, Brigitte wrote:

In post 38, u r a person 2 wrote:still staring at the sun. it's still there =/

Well have you taken a look at Triss? I think she is stealing from my kitchen.

In post 40, Lady Angel wrote:VOTE: VOTE: Brigitte

I'm a vegetarian.

How did you get aboard this vessel as a meat hater? O_o

Qualifications? Magic? Sneaking on my own food supply? I don't know, really.

In post 42, Enter wrote:

In post 40, Lady Angel wrote:VOTE: VOTE: Brigitte

I'm a vegetarian.

That's some hardcore voting right there, you must have very strong feelings about her. How do you feel about voting u r a person 2

Eh, he seems innocuous so far. I rarely ever get pinged super early so I'll give him a bit.

Being reasonable during RVS drives me crazy.

If you have magical powers, can you please summon triss for me? Please and thank you. and I will prepare an awesome salad for next meal just for you.

This is the most exciting part of the game you can do what you want push who you want say what you want none of it matters.

PEdit: sure:

VOTE: tris

In post 55, Enter wrote:This is the most exciting part of the game you can do what you want push who you want say what you want none of it matters.

PEdit: sure:

VOTE: tris

Quoting this to use as leverage for when I take down Enter later in the game.

Why wait vote me now

I townread you right now. It wouldn't be nice to vote my townreads.

That's kinda boring tho.

We could pretend to be mortal enemies if you would prefer. I like to think of myself as an amazing actress!

I feel like no one else loves RVS like I do. I feel like there used to be games where you could get so much sorted in the first few pages but there's only one person to talk to here so we sort... nothing. :/ oh well. Vote triss with me?

In post 34, Enter wrote:

In post 32, Brigitte wrote:Nope!

Seemed to me he came in here threw down a RVS vote. Then voted someone because they were joke posting. Both pretty empty of alignment content to me. Unless he comes in here to say otherwise I am pretty sure theres nothing there to really think about.

Seems strange to me to think to think its AI.

I would agree it's probably not AI. Actually, I like the vote switch. That's a good point. I'd argue that's more town indicative than scum indicative, if anything.

VOTE: u r a person 2

Really would like to get a wagon going. U r a person 2 is really jokey here, he was pretty serious during marathon, so that seems like enough reason.

Vote with me?

I would think someone would play differently in a marathon than in a regular game.

In post 45, Brigitte wrote:

In post 15, tris wrote:Why the change of mind?

I found this question kind of interesting in that, I didn't think the reasoning behind it was there. As though when I read it, I immediately thought "does triss really think there is reasoning here that goes beyond joke posting?" I might be over thinking it but I found the placement odd. Maybe this is overthought to a simple question of person just responding to question.

I wish to have triss here to talk.

I was just curious why he changed his vote immediately.

In post 35, u r a person 2 wrote:Can I suggest NMSA for that wagon? I expect you'll find that more productive, anyhow.

Ok, VOTE: NMSA

trisssssss

In post 62, tris wrote:I would think someone would play differently in a marathon than in a regular game.

I agree, but some reason > no reason

Fair enough

Hi reck!

VOTE: NMSA
seems constructive

In post 24, Brigitte wrote:I plead the fifth.

Hi anyways

hello everyone!
VOTE: skitter
back in a day or so.

In post 12, tris wrote:This is mafia.

VOTE: Flubbernugget

why

==

In post 31, Enter wrote:

In post 30, Brigitte wrote:

In post 29, Enter wrote:

In post 24, Brigitte wrote:I plead the fifth.

It doesn't matter, I don't think I've ever played with you before. How interested are you in lynching reckoner?

None at all right now.

I don't think he has generated anything of AI quality yet.

That doesn't make you think things? We're already on the second page and there is no AI content coming from his slot. Seems a bit interesting, doesn't it?

a) it's the second page, why do you expect ai content from his slot? ie why are you bringing this up even as a point of note? like it's the second page and there's no ai content from my slot either? like why is this significant at this stage of the game?

b) i feel like you're trying to encourage brigitte into probing reckenor (for utterly inane reasons no less) and it feels a little manipulative to me

ok reading on a bit more, what's your read on brigitte at ~34? i don't think the two of you are svs

==

In post 42, Enter wrote:

In post 40, Lady Angel wrote:VOTE: VOTE: Brigitte

I'm a vegetarian.

That's some hardcore voting right there, you must have very strong feelings about her. How do you feel about voting u r a person 2

what does 'hardcore voting' mean?

==

urap2 might be town.

@urap: do you think you can diffrentiate nmsa's towngame from his scumgame? ie were you able to read him correctly in 1917?

==

In post 47, Enter wrote:Town
Reckon

Lady Angel


Brigitte
U r a person 2
Scum

huh from your earlier posts i thought you were kinda townreading brigtte actually? why do you think she and urap2 are scummy rn?

and you're townreading reck that strongly off of switching his vote ...? i didn't read it as much ai
and honestly i guess i'm a little confused how he's your strongest/only townread after you said you thought there was no ai content from the slot

==

tris might be town too? not sure yet. this + urap2 are entirely gut rn

In post 70, skitter30 wrote:urap2 might be town.

@urap: do you think you can diffrentiate nmsa's towngame from his scumgame? ie were you able to read him correctly in 1917?

I wavered on him for a hot minute in the middle of the game, but I read him correctly and confidently early, and I plan on correctly reading him here.

In post 62, tris wrote:I was just curious why he changed his vote immediately.

Do you think there is a deeper meaning than the reasoning I gave?

In post 66, Ankamius wrote:Hi reck!

Hello ankamius. Would you care for some ice cream in exchange for a vote?

In post 68, tictac wrote:

In post 24, Brigitte wrote:I plead the fifth.

Hi anyways

=) Hi, how are you?