Mafiascum.net

It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

urap is prob!town.

p-edit

That was mine....you.

In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

Personally, I can understand it. Like, if I know someone, I might get a better read off of an early interaction with them than with someone I have no framework for.

What do you think about Locke having three votes on him?

alternatively if you have any thoughts on anything, I'd take those. It's early, and I'm just looking to get inside your head. It doesn't matter what about.

hmm...

In post 52, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

Personally, I can understand it. Like, if I know someone, I might get a better read off of an early interaction with them than with someone I have no framework for.

What do you think about Locke having three votes on him?

alternatively if you have any thoughts on anything, I'd take those. It's early, and I'm just looking to get inside your head. It doesn't matter what about.

Well, I like your logic and questions so far. It feels genuine. I think what you're asking is good for town in general, and it's putting me at ease to have someone ask me what I think since it's my first game in here. I'm feeling strong town vibes from you.

As for the Locke vote, I feel like not_mafia getting on that BW with a joke feels odd, so I am keeping my vote on him. No thoughts about the other two since they feel much more random.

I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

Should I jump on locke with you?

And gut feels on me or on NomNomNom?

I think you should jump on if you think you should.

Gut feels were about Nom^3

I said I think you are prob!town.

In post 57, PenguinPower wrote:I think you should jump on if you think you should.

Gut feels were about Nom^3

I said I think you are prob!town.

Gotcha, just wasn't sure because of the hmm comment

Stream of consciousness poster...sorry. I can see how you thought that.

Oh...this is an 11p game

Just thought it was a 13p game...huh.

Thesp's votecounter.

No qualifier as to setup.

Hmm...

Ugh...I need a few people to start interacting more to help me out here.

In post 63, PenguinPower wrote:Ugh...I need a few people to start interacting more to help me out here.

Alacrity is here!

Is there something specific you would like me to comment on?

Your general thoughts atm?

I'm better with somewhat realtime interaction.

In post 49, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 48, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 39, nomnomnom wrote:

In post 35, themilkcartonkid wrote:

In post 30, nomnomnom wrote:Voting the only person you know?
Isn't that a bit counter-intuitive?

Maybe, why?

I don't know, just a question that went through my mind when reading your post, so I'm asking since I'm curious.

Now that you've thought about it, do you think there is anything either bad or scum-indicative about voting for someone you know?

In general? I don't think so, it was more genuine curiosity. I haven't seen anyone do this on the other places I played unless it was like, a private joke or something.

In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

Nothing much that I would like to comment on, but these two posts are at least interesting. It might be overacted?

Why do you think that is over-reacted?

Not over-reacted, over-acted.

Post 49 was a good continuation, why was post 50 needed?

Hmm..maybe. Noted for later, but that's going to end up dependent on playstyle.

In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

Should I jump on locke with you?

My gut and experience tells me urap isn't this sheep-y as town.

VOTE: urap

In post 69, Alacrity wrote:Not over-reacted, over-acted.

Post 49 was a good continuation, why was post 50 needed?

Just making sure I was understood, might have not needed

GrandWazoo wrote:

In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.

Should I jump on locke with you?

My gut and experience tells me urap isn't this sheep-y as town.

VOTE: urap

is it really sheeping if he hasn't voted Locke? I feel you're jumping the gun here.

In post 26, Alacrity wrote:Good morning! I look forward to playing with all of you today. =)

VOTE: insomnia

In post 29, themilkcartonkid wrote:VOTE: lovebird because I dont know anyone else

Like half the players in this game had already voted at this point and neither of you voted on someone with a vote already on them. Just why?

Seriously, more wagons with more than 1 vote please, need to turn up the heat in here

In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

In post 54, nomnomnom wrote: Well, I like your logic and questions so far. It feels genuine. I think what you're asking is good for town in general, and it's putting me at ease to have someone ask me what I think since it's my first game in here. I'm feeling strong town vibes from you.

Hmmmm

In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote: Should I jump on locke with you?

Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?