Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:05 am
This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
What's fucking with my head right now is why no one is questioning it.In post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
I can't speak for the RVS behavior comment since I'm unfamiliar with large games, however, the RVS self-vote gave me town vibes. I saw it as a way to fish out reactions from players, and an attempt to get us out of the RVS as soon as possible. The reason why I got town vibes from it is that I thought it would give us better reactions than your typical random vote. There's no other reason that I can see why she would self-vote in that situation. Her vote in Post 49 only reinforces what I said regarding fishing out a reaction.In post 53, ceejayvinoya wrote:What's fucking with my head right now is why no one is questioning it.In post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
Is this normal rvs behavior for a large theme game?
It doesn't strike me as scummy, hence I didn't vote, but it's very anti town.
In post 52, XtoxicNim wrote:you know what would be super funny
if S_S rolled scum for the 3rd time in a row in boon games
The question you should really be asking is wtf is
more like why wouldn't you question a self voteIn post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
This seems like a weird response to me considering you never questioned it yourself, nor did you ever point out how it wasn't okay until just now. I never said I was okay with someone self-voting, but this is way different than your regular self-vote considering it's a self-vote on Page 1 and is very clearly a vote to gather reactions.In post 58, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:more like why wouldn't you question a self voteIn post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
why would you be ok with someone self voting
I can't speak as to why she voted ceejay, but my guess is because of she believed that the reaction was poor (as I did). I'm sure awestfie will respond to this soon enough considering just how much discussion there is around her actions, however, I believe that the action of self-voting was done because of either:In post 60, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:I generally don't really read RVS naked votes because what's the point
I only noticed that self vote happened because someone quoted it later
Gotta talk about something to get out of RVS - I think given awestfie went directly onto ceejay with her vote, it was kinda planned...Do you think awestfie believes the reaction test is a good scum catching mechanism or do you think awestfie just wanted a reason to lay down any old vote, ie manufacturing a reason, or maybe it's just some way to get the first wagon of the day going
thoughts?
All hail the unkillable god UnaBombah! \o/In post 46, UnaBombaH wrote:Only a couple of players I haven't played with in this game, so I think I'm gonna do well.
Also, because everyone else is already doing these kinds of gimmicks: I'm a "non-consecutive night Commuter".
I'll probably start commuting tonight as to avoid dying N1 as I'm a huge threat to scum, and then claim D2 that I didn't actually commute N1 to get myself to D3 because scum are afraid to miss a nightkill N2, only to realize that I really DID start commuting N1 meaning that I'll also commute N3 meaning that they can't kill me then either....
No that would actually be tragic, especially since poor Baezu would be dragged into my curse...In post 52, XtoxicNim wrote:you know what would be super funny
if S_S rolled scum for the 3rd time in a row in boon games
What's the point of this question?In post 65, Vorkuta wrote:@NC- still disliking the Sheldon character?
Still valid or have you reconsidered?In post 12, Nero Cain wrote:lets pl the stupid gimmick alt.
Claiming negative utility roles is a sitewide thing. una's claim is just a troll.In post 65, Vorkuta wrote:So out of curiosity- is it normal to """mass-claim""" early on in BooneyTunes?
Has my vote switched, no but why are you overly concerned with why I want the slot dead?In post 68, Vorkuta wrote:Still valid or have you reconsidered?In post 12, Nero Cain wrote:lets pl the stupid gimmick alt.
I... believe... one of you?In post 69, Nero Cain wrote:una's claim is just a troll.
Quick and easy low-hanging-fruit mislynch?In post 70, Nero Cain wrote:why are you overly concerned