In post 27, Suspicious wrote:I want to keep talking with Fancy at the. And I have to say I doubt the initial vote as genuine RVS.
Is this directed at me btw? As in you doubt my original vote was RVS?
For the record it was. It'd rather wagon as it's more likely to spark discussion.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 12:16 am
by Plotinus
Dragonblood tree
Mod notes:
january has another (expired on 2019-10-19 05:30:55) to remember mafiascum exists before I start looking for a replacement.[/area]
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:32 am
by Suspicious
@Fancy the post about making an unvote, which I cited in the post, made what appears to be quite a show of swooping in to save the L-1. It paints Bailey positively for ending a mislynch.
In comparison, your unvote looks much more plain and reasoned; simply to avoid a mistake. The following unvote tries very hard to establish that the prior votes were poor.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:34 am
by Suspicious
And that quoted portion was directed at you, but I botched it on mobile. Why did you declare tictac as a hard tr in #15?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:35 am
by Suspicious
In post 46, Vorkuta wrote:VOTE: CJ
The more pages that pass without him making a first post, the townie he is.
This was too early.
*ahem*
They could be offsite gods and it would be suboptimal for them to share such info so don't get your hopes up.
No offense to Cee, but low-effort seems to be his modus operandi. I don't know if it's AI by itself or not.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 1:48 am
by FancyPants
@Suspicious, ah Ok fair.
In post 53, Suspicious wrote:And that quoted portion was directed at you, but I botched it on mobile. Why did you declare tictac as a hard tr in #15?
I like uncertainty in my townies, but in reality it's a minor town read.
Trying to be provocative to get us out of RVS, but it seems like we're there already.
@CJ and January, if you were absolutely forced to lynch someone now, who would it be and why?
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:20 am
by tictac
from Jamelias profile:
Last visited:17 Oct 2019, 16:31
that's in my local time so about 4 hours ago.
I feel like him just having a single post is scum-indic for him.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:38 am
by Jamelia
I don’t have anything to post about and I already voted who I thought was scummy at that time. No one asked me about it, so I don’t feel a need to respond to anything atm.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 6:54 am
by tictac
I am also surprised that ya are real-voting already.
Don't get me wrong: I do approve of that.
Just that in yer first newbie ya were really reluctant to vote like ever.
I expect ya to be easy to read once ya start posting, so it's a bit frustrating that ya don't.
I can wait until ya have things to say tho.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:30 am
by Jamelia
In post 58, tictac wrote:I am also surprised that ya are real-voting already.
Don't get me wrong: I do approve of that.
Just that in yer first newbie ya were really reluctant to vote like ever.
I expect ya to be easy to read once ya start posting, so it's a bit frustrating that ya don't.
I can wait until ya have things to say tho.
Well
[in my first game,]
I’ve seen the benefit of voting and how it creates pressure and gets people to start talking more. I wanted in my next game to try out this strat and see how effective I can be in getting info
snipped reference to ongoing game --P
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:35 am
by january
good mornin everyone
first time on mafiascum, not really familiar with this format so please bear with me
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:42 am
by Vorkuta
VOTE: january
Trial by fire works best IMHO
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:43 am
by tictac
In post 1, Plotinus wrote:Don't talk about ongoing games - You may not talk to each other about this game outside of threads I have created for this purpose. You may not talk about other ongoing games in this thread.
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 7:44 am
by Jamelia
Oh. Sorry. I was just answering the question you asked me.
In post 67, FancyPants wrote:@jammy, talk me through the scum mindset you're feeling from the zenith vote.
This is directed at you Jamelia.
Damn sorry I’m not used to being called @Jammy.
I think any vote needs to be looked at carefully. It’s our responsibility to see if someone is about to be on L-1. That vote matters a lot more than putting someone in L-4/3. RVSing just to RVS is fine, but RVSing a wagon to L-1 is either wreckless, scummy or both. I wanted an explanation for it, so I voted for them.
