Mafiascum.net

In post 42, Chara wrote:i know i've played with others on the list, but the only one i remember anything about is Alch. hello Alch!
insomnia feels very familiar but i'd need my memory jogged on that. it's like a sieve up there.

Hi Chara!

In post 49, Alchemist21 wrote:You’re not going to replace out just because people suspect you are you?

no. first two games I was essentially bullied out of the games. I can't discuss the other two as ongoing.

problem with me is I speak my mind. i will always say what I am thinking no matter how unpopular. If you're a lurking useless player, i'm going to call you a lurking useless player.

If I scum read you for some things, and you don't like it and you want to argue with me about it for the next 20 pages, I will argue back. If you scum read me and I don't agree with you, I will argue with you and if you keep arguing with me I can keep going.

What happens in every single instance, the person i have argued with crossed the line. Bullying, inappropriate comments, personal attacks, etc. I don't tolerate that shit. Game gets heated, that's fine. You make it personal, I report it. if the mod doesn't handle it properly and I feel it will affect the way I play the game, I leave.

I play for fun. Even when I am arguing, I am having fun cause sometimes that is just part of the game.

so what I mean when i say "leave me alone" is basically don't argue with me for 20 pages. If you don't like my reasons, move on cause arguing isn't going to change my mind. If anything it's just going to make me double down. If you want to have a calm rational discussion that's another thing but nobody ever wants to do that.

i only take my opinions of players (personal ones, not AI ones) from my own experiences with them. i don't care what happened before, i only care about this game.

let's make it a friendly one. :>

In post 18, profii wrote:

In post 17, Wimpy wrote:Nobody is a fan of day 1.

Yet we all have to do it

So I find it really frustrating in every other game I play when someone comes in and goes "Day one? Nope"

It's not fair on all the other players

+1
i'm fine with day 1 because the first step for me in understanding how to read someone is getting a feel for how they play and think.

In post 52, Wimpy wrote:so what I mean when i say "leave me alone" is basically don't argue with me for 20 pages. If you don't like my reasons, move on cause arguing isn't going to change my mind. If anything it's just going to make me double down. If you want to have a calm rational discussion that's another thing but nobody ever wants to do that.

Ok that’s reasonable.

In post 49, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 40, Wimpy wrote:Does that phrase have a secondary meaning I’m not aware of?

You’re not going to replace out just because people suspect you are you?

What was the point of this post by the way? It made me sick to my stomach actually. It feels really weird and it's like against the grain with the thread state. What were you hoping to achieve with this? I get you know he replaced out of games, but what was this achieving? I felt it really unnecessary.

It's totally off-topic and I interpreted it as a personal attack rather than an attempt at figuring out anything.

Upon a re-read, it doesn't look like I painted it to be, maybe I exaggerated it, but devoid of context it looked like a personal attack. My bad.

The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

I'm a sad person trying not to be quite so sad

i'm not sure this discussion is the greatest way to start the game. Wimpy gave his answer, Alch acknowledge it, and if Wimpy felt attacked/uncomfortable with the question that's on him to communicate.

what does your own post want to accomplish besides continuing a likely uncomfortable thread of discussion? let's stick to the game here.

VOTE: profii

pedit: my post definitely seems unnecessary now, but i'll leave it in. i personally found Wimpy's posts on the subject useful for the general mindset thing i mentioned earlier.

In post 58, Looker wrote:I'm a sad person trying not to be quite so sad

mood

VOTE: profii

hi all how are people on this day year 87467310 on the primordial earthen calendar

Theophrastus Bombastus

That's too complicated. How about Van? Van Hohenheim...

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

Have you played with wimpy before?

In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

VOTE: Alchemist

night

I didn’t want that quoted.

In post 59, Chara wrote:i'm not sure this discussion is the greatest way to start the game. Wimpy gave his answer, Alch acknowledge it, and if Wimpy felt attacked/uncomfortable with the question that's on him to communicate.

what does your own post want to accomplish besides continuing a likely uncomfortable thread of discussion? let's stick to the game here.

VOTE: profii

pedit: my post definitely seems unnecessary now, but i'll leave it in. i personally found Wimpy's posts on the subject useful for the general mindset thing i mentioned earlier.

In post 60, insomnia wrote:

In post 58, Looker wrote:I'm a sad person trying not to be quite so sad

mood

VOTE: profii

Quick post before I head to sleep: Where did these votes come from?

why ask about those votes in particular?

In post 65, profii wrote:

In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

Have you played with wimpy before?

No.

In post 70, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 65, profii wrote:

In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

Have you played with wimpy before?

No.

I get why insomnia is coming from but I guess its ok to ask the question you asked if you dont know someone

In post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:

In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.

It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.

Oh no I am

Just checking in, I’ll catch-up in a few hours.

In post 38, insomnia wrote:What has Macabre posted in here that he couldn’t post as scum as well?

Your read is awfully rushed. What’s the basis for your read?

VOTE: Aaron Frost

Absolutely nothing, but if I get early gut reads from someone then I'm gonna voice it and see how others react to it.

Gotta start this game somewhere