Mafiascum.net

I broke my intro posts!

is concern for temporal really that scummy of a behavior

Also, townpoints to the first person who guesses my flavor!

In post 53, Asriel Dreemurr wrote:Also, townpoints to the first person who guesses my flavor!

I think the site itself did since it's right above this post

In post 48, Chemist1422 wrote:if y'all try to incite one more time paradox I swear

YEAH EXACTLY

I think Asriel and Chara should post their images

this definitely has more substantial reasoning than me wanting to see them

HEAL: Asriel

I think him being openly nervous about the intro is towny

lightly, but still something I wanna go off of

In post 49, Asriel Dreemurr wrote:HEAL: Chara

there you are! i was waiting for you. i had to say hello by myself.

In post 53, Asriel Dreemurr wrote:Also, townpoints to the first person who guesses my flavor!

In post 58, Chemist1422 wrote:HEAL: Asriel

I think him being openly nervous about the intro is towny

lightly, but still something I wanna go off of

Asriel's nervous about everything.

In post 60, Hectic wrote:

In post 53, Asriel Dreemurr wrote:Also, townpoints to the first person who guesses my flavor!

so very close. you only missed the r.
your prize is... nothing.

In post 61, Chara wrote:

In post 58, Chemist1422 wrote:HEAL: Asriel

I think him being openly nervous about the intro is towny

lightly, but still something I wanna go off of

Asriel's nervous about everything.

you're probably right, but I think if he were scum he'd be more nervous about being nervous

In post 43, Hectic wrote:
HEAL: Billy


HURT: Sherlock

who are you talking to? there aren't any humans here.

also, i like the detective more than Billy. but you're already friends with Billy, aren't you?

In post 63, Chara wrote:who are you talking to? there aren't any humans here.

also, i like the detective more than Billy. but you're already friends with Billy, aren't you?

i'm feeling a little down but the flower scares me...
sorry... i'm not sure why i'm telling you this i don't even know you...
sorry... i just made this more awkward i'm going to fly away now and come back later...

ok i'm back... papyrus says he liked Billy pointing out Chemist's towny entrance...
the flower said he didn't like Sherlock's comments on townhunting vs scumhunting... but it doesn't make him scum... it's just a weird take...
bye...

Just a fluff post so that this game will show up in my 'view your posts' section when I get home!

In post 18, SherlockHolmes wrote:I had hoped that I might be able to discuss at length the latest chemical discoveries, being something of an amateur myself, with the more serious scientist in our little party. Instead, I found myself disconcerted by his need to excuse himself from the beginning of the adventure.

HURT: Chemist1422

Was this serious or still RVS

In post 19, Chemist1422 wrote:Oh I’m sorry would you like me to link the 9 other games I’m playing right now?

Was this a serious answer? Did a quick search but not comprehensive enough to check if you were alive in all of them.

In post 52, Chemist1422 wrote:is concern for temporal

integrity

really that scummy of a behavior

What is temporal integrity?

In post 66, alimdia wrote:

In post 18, SherlockHolmes wrote:I had hoped that I might be able to discuss at length the latest chemical discoveries, being something of an amateur myself, with the more serious scientist in our little party. Instead, I found myself disconcerted by his need to excuse himself from the beginning of the adventure.

HURT: Chemist1422

Was this serious or still RVS

In post 19, Chemist1422 wrote:Oh I’m sorry would you like me to link the 9 other games I’m playing right now?

Was this a serious answer? Did a quick search but not comprehensive enough to check if you were alive in all of them.

In post 52, Chemist1422 wrote:is concern for temporal

integrity

really that scummy of a behavior

What is temporal integrity?

1. Yes but some are on other sites
2. Nothing game-related

Dear Watson, even in the early days of this adventure, I felt an increasing discomfort with the madman amongst us: he acted in such a way as to suggest he believed that was an agent of Moriarty’s, yet when explaining himself, he claimed that my actions were simply “weird” and not indicative of where my loyalties lay. I knew that it was a common move from Moriarty’s henchmen, taught by the Professor himself, to pursue dissent by going after behaviour seeming strange rather than doing meaningful searching for villains.

I also met one of the later members of the part to arrive, a strapping gentleman dressed in armour. He seemed to ask rather pointless questions that made me uneasy. Nevertheless, I responded to him that my concern about the chemist was quite legitimate. In fact I felt that if the madman were simply insane then this chap was the most likely to be working for Moriarty in his place.

I also found myself needing to explain simple physics to the fellow: that based on the words “temporal” meaning time, and “integrity” meaning wholeness or completeness, “temporal integrity” was clearly a phrase designed to refer to the orderly and unidirectional progression of events within time, where time is perceived as a river flowing only down to the ocean.

you really need to stop dropping your letters of correspondence to Watson. I think just about everyone here has a read of them. It's , so careful what you write in there.

Secondly, I disliked your take on the townhunting vs scumhunting because it ignores the fact that it's easier to townhunt for several reasons more than because "there's more town in the game than Moriarty's henchman." Town players can act scummy a lot of the time. It's harder for a mafia player to act very naturally towny, and that's the people we're SPARING - which we only need 4 of. We also have a Friendly Neighbour. I'm looking forward to sending them some .

, like I said, it doesn't make you scum, but the reasons you gave for disregarding SPARING as superior seem .

I realised the mad fellow had possibly misunderstood my words, Watson. He had believed that I was suggesting that we should not attempt to secure ourselves by being sure of our comrades, when I was simply taking issue with the regular and erroneous self-perception that some people have that they are better at tracking who are not agents of Moriarty than hunting down those who are.

Perhaps the gentleman was more lucid than I previously believed...

Spoiler (may cause nightmares):

In post 70, SherlockHolmes wrote:I realised the mad fellow had possibly misunderstood my words, Watson. He had believed that I was suggesting that we should not attempt to secure ourselves by being sure of our comrades, when I was simply taking issue with the regular and erroneous self-perception that some people have that they are better at tracking who are not agents of Moriarty than hunting down those who are.

Perhaps the gentleman was more lucid than I previously believed...