Mafiascum.net

In post 46, Elsa Jay wrote:

In post 42, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: eth0s

I spent way too long reading the playerlist and his name just jumped out at me for some reason.

It has a number in it. People with numbers in their username are ten times more likely to be evil.

Oh snap

Egix96 why not join the glorious TSE wagon?

In post 46, Elsa Jay wrote:People with numbers in their username are ten times more likely to be evil.

Since I'm an SK, guess I better switch to my alt iiSq5024 then

Yeah watch out Egi Ex Ninety Six for those dang number folk, you hear?

In post 1, Wake1 wrote:Faction Ratio is 37:6:6:1.

There is a 26% chance we'll lynch an anti-town player. Assuming a completely unbiased lynch.
74% chance we lynch town.

In post 51, Nero Cain wrote:Egix96 why not join the glorious TSE wagon?

Did you see me agreeing with what Smart said?

In post 49, Garmr wrote:

In post 31, insomnia wrote:

In post 30, Garmr wrote:

In post 17, Something_Smart wrote:SK here, killing the first person to post each day. Sorry Norweiganboy.

I'm also a SK so i'll VOTE: TrueSoulEnergy

Actual wolfy vote

Nah I am cult leader and making you join tonight. Curious why your still on The through.

In post 44, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 40, tictac wrote:how a wagon moves, what the counterwagons are. who gets on and who doesn't.
none of this is different for a policy lynch than a regular lynch.

They still exist, true, but with a policy lynch, people's reasons for joining or not joining it are generally not related to their alignment.

I mean u going hard defense on TSE, and that's info that's gonna be useful tomorrow. More useful if we know what TSEs align is.
So yer 'no info from policy lynches' stance is kinda nonsensisical.

what do ya think of me pushing for a info lynch, yet calling info lynching crappy?

In post 53, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah watch out Egi Ex Ninety Six for those dang number folk, you hear?

It's eejicks smh

In post 54, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1, Wake1 wrote:Faction Ratio is 37:6:6:1.

There is a 26% chance we'll lynch an anti-town player. Assuming a completely unbiased lynch.
74% chance we lynch town.

I'm a gambling man myself and those look like good odds to me

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1, Wake1 wrote:Faction Ratio is 37:6:6:1.

There is a 26% chance we'll lynch an anti-town player. Assuming a completely unbiased lynch.
74% chance we lynch town.

It's not unbiased though since you started it for some unknown reason. If your town fair enough, but it aint unbiased atleast.

In post 60, Elsa Jay wrote:

NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1, Wake1 wrote:Faction Ratio is 37:6:6:1.

There is a 26% chance we'll lynch an anti-town player. Assuming a completely unbiased lynch.
74% chance we lynch town.

It's not unbiased though since you started it for some unknown reason. If your town fair enough, but it aint unbiased atleast.

I'm going to bed and when I come back a expect no more than 7 pages got it.

I'm just saying it's not unbiased since we had a guy choose it. If they rolled the tag dice I would've said it was completely unbiased but they didn't. Therefore there's a mild bias.

In post 54, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 1, Wake1 wrote:Faction Ratio is 37:6:6:1.

There is a 26% chance we'll lynch an anti-town player. Assuming a completely unbiased lynch.
74% chance we lynch town.

could be we get loads of mislynches, eh?
so chance to hit town is whatevers.

no more than 7 pages got it.

lol

In post 62, Garmr wrote:I'm going to bed and when I come back a expect no more than 7 pages got it.

You ask a big thing in a 50 player game.

That's a trendier wagon than pelotons

VOTE: Garmr

This is the lazy man's vote. GET IN.

VOTE: Garmr

put the dog to rest.

In post 57, tictac wrote:

In post 44, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 40, tictac wrote:how a wagon moves, what the counterwagons are. who gets on and who doesn't.
none of this is different for a policy lynch than a regular lynch.

They still exist, true, but with a policy lynch, people's reasons for joining or not joining it are generally not related to their alignment.

I mean u going hard defense on TSE, and that's info that's gonna be useful tomorrow. More useful if we know what TSEs align is.
So yer 'no info from policy lynches' stance is kinda nonsensisical.

what do ya think of me pushing for a info lynch, yet calling info lynching crappy?

prediction: SS will get ran up regardless of TSE's alignment b/c SS looks bad for defending him period

lets give garmr a page of garmr votes to read when he gets back

VOTE: Garmr

In post 69, bob3141 wrote:lets give garmr a page of garmr votes to read when he gets back

VOTE: Garmr

this is town

SS always gets lynched for some dumbass reason especially if scum. He'll make his alignment more clear because it's going to be hard to lolhammer him in a game like this.

In post 46, Elsa Jay wrote:

In post 42, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: eth0s

I spent way too long reading the playerlist and his name just jumped out at me for some reason.

It has a number in it. People with numbers in their username are ten times more likely to be evil.

I feel like you shouldn't have a problem with that statement A50.

In post 60, Elsa Jay wrote:It's not unbiased though since you started it for some unknown reason. If your town fair enough, but it aint unbiased atleast.

Assuming i am a member of a 6 man scum team.
That changes the likelihood down to 12.5% chance we lynch scum. (Assuming i did not vote a partner)
Still not terrible odds.