Mafiascum.net

Wait im confused.... I thought ive played with para but apparently hesnnew as of this month??

In post 50, TheTrollie wrote:Wait im confused.... I thought ive played with para but apparently hesnnew as of this month??

Are you thinking of Parama? Or PeregrineV?

VOTE: Espressojet

Look at this lurking scum

In post 44, iDanyboy wrote:

In post 34, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 31, Paragon wrote:Hmm, is that a crumb, Allomancer? Wouldn't it be more sensible to claim that outright?

VOTE: Allomancer

what town-motivation could there possibly be behind pointing out a potential crumb??? smells fishy to me, paragon

Why note vote then. VOTE: Morning Tweet

Morning Tweet/Paragon.

so im too scared to vote my partner on the 2nd page, but not scared to say something about him is fishy?

surely pointing out a potentially scummy action is more of a commitment

In post 53, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 44, iDanyboy wrote:

In post 34, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 31, Paragon wrote:Hmm, is that a crumb, Allomancer? Wouldn't it be more sensible to claim that outright?

VOTE: Allomancer

what town-motivation could there possibly be behind pointing out a potential crumb??? smells fishy to me, paragon

Why note vote then. VOTE: Morning Tweet

Morning Tweet/Paragon.

so im too scared to vote my partner on the 2nd page, but not scared to say something about him is fishy?

surely pointing out a potentially scummy action is more of a commitment

This actions is possibly scummy sure is a commitment.

Paragon, Allomancer - lean town
CatScratch, mav - undecided
iDany, bob - lean scum

paragon 39 felt like a town reaction to me + i like the way the miller crumb interaction played out

dany is forcing voting me a lil, i dont buy his reasoningggg but it could be town struggling to find something to say

I don't know how I botched that one up.

In post 51, BBmolla wrote:

In post 50, TheTrollie wrote:Wait im confused.... I thought ive played with para but apparently hesnnew as of this month??

Are you thinking of Parama? Or PeregrineV?

Parama maybe? But like in my memory the avatar was even the same. I guess i am wrong.

Ok so then paragon is a whole other situation. Gotcha

Paragon has Xalxes avatar

Miss the old guard ((

In post 55, Morning Tweet wrote:Paragon, Allomancer - lean town
CatScratch, mav - undecided
iDany, bob - lean scum

paragon 39 felt like a town reaction to me + i like the way the miller crumb interaction played out

dany is forcing voting me a lil, i dont buy his reasoningggg but it could be town struggling to find something to say

I'm not forcing anything. You said you found someone scummy with out a vote, then said your comment is stronger than a vote, but now you town read him for the same interaction which you called fishy.

In post 58, BBmolla wrote:Paragon has Xalxes avatar

Miss the old guard ((

he modded my first newbie game :c

iDanyboy wrote:

In post 55, Morning Tweet wrote:Paragon, Allomancer - lean town
CatScratch, mav - undecided
iDany, bob - lean scum

paragon 39 felt like a town reaction to me + i like the way the miller crumb interaction played out

dany is forcing voting me a lil, i dont buy his reasoningggg but it could be town struggling to find something to say

I'm not forcing anything. You said you found someone scummy with out a vote, then said your comment is stronger than a vote, but now you town read him for the same interaction which you called fishy.

once i realized what he meant by what he said (that he was referring to a miller crumb), i don't find anything fishy about it now. i considered the possibility he made that explanation up, but im positive that's what he meant the whole way thru

if i were scum with para, why bother to make the comment if i dont even have the resolve to vote him?

iDanyboy vs Morning Tweet feels like town vs town. It's understandable to not want to vote someone based on one thing you see as fishy, but I can follow dany's reasoning as well.

Also to be clear, there was no miller crumb.

Wtf is a miller crumb

Everyone active is probably town

Zzzzzz

In post 55, Morning Tweet wrote:Paragon, Allomancer - lean town
CatScratch, mav - undecided
iDany, bob - lean scum

paragon 39 felt like a town reaction to me + i like the way the miller crumb interaction played out

dany is forcing voting me a lil, i dont buy his reasoningggg but it could be town struggling to find something to say

To afraid to join a popular day one wagon?

In post 60, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 58, BBmolla wrote:Paragon has Xalxes avatar

Miss the old guard ((

he modded my first newbie game :c

iDanyboy wrote:

In post 55, Morning Tweet wrote:Paragon, Allomancer - lean town
CatScratch, mav - undecided
iDany, bob - lean scum

paragon 39 felt like a town reaction to me + i like the way the miller crumb interaction played out

dany is forcing voting me a lil, i dont buy his reasoningggg but it could be town struggling to find something to say

I'm not forcing anything. You said you found someone scummy with out a vote, then said your comment is stronger than a vote, but now you town read him for the same interaction which you called fishy.

once i realized what he meant by what he said (that he was referring to a miller crumb), i don't find anything fishy about it now. i considered the possibility he made that explanation up, but im positive that's what he meant the whole way thru

if i were scum with para, why bother to make the comment if i dont even have the resolve to vote him?

So your saying your not scum with para?

You didnt say that you were not scum. You said you were not scum with papa.

If you were town you would have said "if i were scum, why bother to make the comment if i dont even have the resolve to vote him?"


But you say "with para".

feels like scum making a slip. They know para is town and thus using it to try and defend themselves

Are you baiting me into scumslipping something like "I'm scum, just not with Para"?

pedit: I KNEW IT

I said "If I were scum with Para" because I was being accused of bussing. It doesn't really imply that I'm putting emphasis on the *with Para* part

In post 69, Morning Tweet wrote:Are you baiting me into scumslipping something like "I'm scum, just not with Para"?

pedit: I KNEW IT

So your saying that you were aware and have infact avoided slipping that your not partnered with para.

<insert me banging face into table>

no

In post 66, bob3141 wrote:So your saying your not scum with para?

this is a loaded question that incriminates me for answering it and it feels like you're trying to make me "scumslip", which i neglected to put in quotes in my last message cause i'm a peabrain

In post 70, Morning Tweet wrote:I said "If I were scum with Para" because I was being accused of bussing. It doesn't really imply that I'm putting emphasis on the *with Para* part

So you were feeling actually aware of beign accussed of beign seen to be bussing x. When a was infacting pushign by reading his posts that you were scummy for your interactions in response to para. He never expressed a view on para other than his first rvs vote. but you assumed he was accusing you of bussing straight away.

You never pushed how you were not scum but that scum you wouldnt buss para if he was your buddy