In post 33, CantHateAPuppy wrote:You don't understand, usually by now Blair has the class settled down and school is in session. You'll see I guess, or maybe not, don't want to poison the well here, (Sorry Blair!)
So you're saying in your past experience, Blair would be serious out of the gates? Want to make sure I'm interpreting correctly
Blair posts a lot in RVS, that's all, don't mean anything scummy implied
Quick looks like he's doing his own thing but i want him to explain his townread more so
In post 33, CantHateAPuppy wrote:You don't understand, usually by now Blair has the class settled down and school is in session. You'll see I guess, or maybe not, don't want to poison the well here, (Sorry Blair!)
So you're saying in your past experience, Blair would be serious out of the gates? Want to make sure I'm interpreting correctly
Blair posts a lot in RVS, that's all, don't mean anything scummy implied
Quick looks like he's doing his own thing but i want him to explain his townread more so
VOTE: Quick
Sure let me try to.
As am experienced Scum he wouldn't think to take my advice seriously. That is why he "considered" doing it.
Then he said I had a good read. Make of that what you will.
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 3:25 pm
by CantHateAPuppy
I think youre beIng a little cryptic for some reason, but i guess i like that answer well enough for now
in that case: justification? hopping on a wagon without justification post RVS seems bad
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:22 pm
by Blair
Puppy's wagon switch to Quick just to ask him a question, then unvoting while managing to both approve and disapprove of his answer simultaneously didn't sit well with me.
It looks like he just wanted an excuse to take his vote out of play (it does not appear that he is entirely devoid of opinions on everyone at this stage, so why did he take his vote out of play?)
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:25 pm
by CantHateAPuppy
In post 60, Blair wrote:Puppy's wagon switch to Quick just to ask him a question, then unvoting while managing to both approve and disapprove of his answer simultaneously didn't sit well with me.
It looks like he just wanted an excuse to take his vote out of play (it does not appear that he is entirely devoid of opinions on everyone at this stage, so why did he take his vote out of play?)
What do you think i would get by taking my vote out of play?
i will explain m quick thoughts some more, but i want to hear u answer this question first.
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:26 pm
by Blair
I don't know.
I don't have to know what your ulterior motive was in order to recognize that there must have been one.
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:29 pm
by Atarashi Hajimari
VOTE: Puppy
I'm down to sheep Blair for now. I'm also amused by how Puppy's been saying "Oh I know Blair! We've played together a ton!" and Blair is saying "Who are you...?"
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:30 pm
by Atarashi Hajimari
I'm also waiting for Quick to keep asking their random questions like they wanted to.
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:31 pm
by Blair
I will have stronger reads as the game progresses, possibly on you, perhaps on others. Right now, however, this is the event that perturbs me the most (that weird counterwagon action being the other one). I've placed my vote accordingly, I would urge others to do the same.
Why is your vote no longer in play, Puppy? It seems like you should have a better answer to the question you asked me.
Posted: Thu May 14, 2020 4:32 pm
by CantHateAPuppy
Never played with Quick before, so i wanted to figure out why he gave me a cryptic answer, that's all the vote was for.
i liked his second answer better, and it's too soon to start tunneling.