Posted: Mon May 25, 2020 6:07 pm
I think your methodology neglects practical insight in favour of an ultimately fruitless toil for a theoretical truth
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Do you not believe that Espeonage chose this particular style of approach before/independent of his alignment?In post 49, jjh927 wrote:Espeonage can be hard town I guess
Honestly I am.In post 32, jjh927 wrote:I voted him because he literally claimed scum in his first post
I'm not prejudiced against rainbows
I have already stated a position that was informed by my experience. Do you not think that that would qualify as "practical insight"?In post 50, jjh927 wrote:I think your methodology neglects practical insight in favour of an ultimately fruitless toil for a theoretical truth
May we know what this indicator is?In post 52, jjh927 wrote:You are mistaken and you have failed to see a different indicator for his alignment
No idea, I already regret it.In post 57, jjh927 wrote:Oh yeah I saw you joined this game beeboy
I haven't seen you in a game in aaages
Why'd you join this probable shitheap
Espeonage is actually working around the probably self-imposed post restriction to say useful things with an above average level of insight for RVS (which helps the gamestate)In post 56, Socratés wrote:May we know what this indicator is?In post 52, jjh927 wrote:You are mistaken and you have failed to see a different indicator for his alignment
I see your gambit buddyIn post 16, JacksonVirgo wrote:HonestlyIthinkPorkensisscum.Theirentireenergyislikeflyingundertheradarandthat'sliketheoppositeofatownmindsetyouknow?
VOTE: Porkens
In post 60, jjh927 wrote:Espeonage is actually working around the probably self-imposed post restriction to say useful things with an above average level of insight for RVS (which helps the gamestate)In post 56, Socratés wrote:May we know what this indicator is?In post 52, jjh927 wrote:You are mistaken and you have failed to see a different indicator for his alignment
That's highly town indicative due to the level of effort
I had not considered the possibility that it was a post restriction. Thank you for your insight. I agree with your conclusion.In post 60, jjh927 wrote:Espeonage is actually working around the probably self-imposed post restriction
VOTE: jjhIn post 60, jjh927 wrote:Espeonage is actually working around the probably self-imposed post restriction to say useful things with an above average level of insight for RVS (which helps the gamestate)In post 56, Socratés wrote:May we know what this indicator is?In post 52, jjh927 wrote:You are mistaken and you have failed to see a different indicator for his alignment
That's highly town indicative due to the level of effort
In post 68, beeboy wrote:VOTE: jjhIn post 60, jjh927 wrote:Espeonage is actually working around the probably self-imposed post restriction to say useful things with an above average level of insight for RVS (which helps the gamestate)In post 56, Socratés wrote:May we know what this indicator is?In post 52, jjh927 wrote:You are mistaken and you have failed to see a different indicator for his alignment
That's highly town indicative due to the level of effort
When I wake up I'll let you know if I still don't like this post.
Ik we both know this is a throw away page 3 read/ shit post, but it just feels so awkward to me
Ah but there is so much overlap and your model doesn’t allow for the town aligned scum player eithrrIn post 48, Socratés wrote:My experience suggests that it falls outside the dichotomy of what mafia and town would post, and is thus an unreliable metric to decide one's alignment upon to any extent.In post 41, Crimson97 wrote:What are your philosophical thoughts on Jackson's entrance Socrates?
Do you disagree? Why so?
Yeh.In post 48, Socratés wrote:My experience suggests that it falls outside the dichotomy of what mafia and town would post, and is thus an unreliable metric to decide one's alignment upon to any extent.In post 41, Crimson97 wrote:What are your philosophical thoughts on Jackson's entrance Socrates?
Do you disagree? Why so?