Master Farside! I would advise you not to argue my existence is "made up". It accidently trips my Mark II Philosophy unit, making me ponder my programming. After all, I'm currently in a state of ethical bliss where I massacre all organics in the same, wanton style. Tempering which such a perfect wiring will only lead to decrease efficiency.
UNVOTE: notscience VOTE: Farside
[Observation:]
However master, I am rather perplexed by the tonal discharge displayed by you in post 29. Despite my strewed desires, you seem deadly serious in your apology when the thread's tone was akin to cheerful banter. Why did you felt the need to Apolgize for the lack of murdering?
[Addendum:]
Assuming your dialogue with Dunnstral has reached its concordance with its primary directive, what did you hope to gain from asking him such a question? It seems you believe that Dunnstral demonstrated a logical gap in that another game he was pushed for being passive as town, yet pushes Notscience here for it. Is this correct? If so, what makes you believe the phrasing by Dunnstral in said evidence is not influenced by random voting stage behavior? As that would be the consequence of such a read.
I thought you were saying you were trying to use your mmmmmm.......... performance to do a reaction test, so I was apologizing if I ruined your fun.
As for Dunn I was curious about his vote and reasoning on NS. I don't think passive is a scum tell if someone was passive themselves. So my question was to see his response to that that. So far I would say his response is noncommittal. Also I'm not a big RVS wagon ho type. So I question players on wagons typically.
[Cross examination:]
I can understand that rational for the apology and the Dunnstral progression. Mainly the tonal points tripped my circuits because of the lack of understanding my post(s) may of been interpreted as a reaction test.
UNVOTE: Farside
[General Query:]
What does the thread think of master Malakitten's posts?
If one of Vot or HT50 flips scum I’m ok with them being partnered. This is HT50’s first game. I obv get it that’s it’s an alt account. But the whole knowledge felt off to me
[Query:]
Addtionally, what was the extent of this "deeper look"? What methodology was used?
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 12:32 pm
by HK 50
In post 49, Ghost Ganster wrote:Sorry to say, but I'm not a big fan of the gimmick. It makes it a bit of a chore to read the thread. It feels bad to vote them because of it and it feels bad to parse the posts.
Also, all the talk about past games is confusing. Could I convince you all to either stop/limit it or explain it to those of us who lack the context to interpret it?
[Statement:]
Master, it is perfectly acceptable to admit my superiority in both language and charisma. Although, I do appreciate your rebuttal to the acceptance of my vocalizer when the rest of the organics seemingly praising it.
If one of Vot or HT50 flips scum I’m ok with them being partnered. This is HT50’s first game. I obv get it that’s it’s an alt account. But the whole knowledge felt off to me
[Query:]
Addtionally, what was the extent of this "deeper look"? What methodology was used?
Your total topic. I don’t know who your main is and honestly I’m not going to waste the little time I have to try to sort it out. You’re playing an old gimmick and that’s fine with me. As long as it doesn’t interfere with trying to sort you I’m ok with that.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:03 pm
by Not_Mafia
Wtf is a ganster?
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:06 pm
by Malakittens
In post 49, Ghost Ganster wrote:Sorry to say, but I'm not a big fan of the gimmick. It makes it a bit of a chore to read the thread. It feels bad to vote them because of it and it feels bad to parse the posts.
Also, all the talk about past games is confusing. Could I convince you all to either stop/limit it or explain it to those of us who lack the context to interpret it?
It would be in bad taste to just justify a vote and a possible lynch off just that.
I hate to say it, but I used to sort people due to old game meta, but I have been offline for quite a few years. I still might actually do it because I do know a few of the players in this game.
I feel bad to those who weren’t around when the 2013-meta block was active because once we sort each other out I feel like this game will take an interesting toll.
UNVOTE: Notty
Also mod can I ask you to add how many players it takes to lynch to end a day. I’d like to not do math on my time off, thank you.
Noted. By my count, it is 7 to lynch. I'll post that in the next VC. -Jake
Master Farside! I would advise you not to argue my existence is "made up". It accidently trips my Mark II Philosophy unit, making me ponder my programming. After all, I'm currently in a state of ethical bliss where I massacre all organics in the same, wanton style. Tempering which such a perfect wiring will only lead to decrease efficiency.
UNVOTE: notscience VOTE: Farside
[Observation:]
However master, I am rather perplexed by the tonal discharge displayed by you in post 29. Despite my strewed desires, you seem deadly serious in your apology when the thread's tone was akin to cheerful banter. Why did you felt the need to Apolgize for the lack of murdering?
[Addendum:]
Assuming your dialogue with Dunnstral has reached its concordance with its primary directive, what did you hope to gain from asking him such a question? It seems you believe that Dunnstral demonstrated a logical gap in that another game he was pushed for being passive as town, yet pushes Notscience here for it. Is this correct? If so, what makes you believe the phrasing by Dunnstral in said evidence is not influenced by random voting stage behavior? As that would be the consequence of such a read.
I thought you were saying you were trying to use your mmmmmm.......... performance to do a reaction test, so I was apologizing if I ruined your fun.
As for Dunn I was curious about his vote and reasoning on NS. I don't think passive is a scum tell if someone was passive themselves. So my question was to see his response to that that. So far I would say his response is noncommittal. Also I'm not a big RVS wagon ho type. So I question players on wagons typically.
[Cross examination:]
I can understand that rational for the apology and the Dunnstral progression. Mainly the tonal points tripped my circuits because of the lack of understanding my post(s) may of been interpreted as a reaction test.
UNVOTE: Farside
[General Query:]
What does the thread think of master Malakitten's posts?
I haven't moved my vote off of her.
I don't like how she has already attached a scum read off of 2 players based on a video game. Seems like a stretch to me.
And if she has that scum read/feeling why did she vote for NS instead of one of you?
So in all I'd say scum read.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:46 pm
by Malakittens
I haven’t really stated it’s a solid scum read. I said I’m back burning it for now, but if one of them flips scum I’m looking into the other as a possible partner. If I truely thought they were scum I’d have voted there.
In post 61, Malakittens wrote:I haven’t really stated it’s a solid scum read. I said I’m back burning it for now, but if one of them flips scum I’m looking into the other as a possible partner. If I truely thought they were scum I’d have voted there.
Hey at least the game is out of RVS now.
Off a video game reference?
I know your haven't played in awhile, but really?
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:52 pm
by Malakittens
I said it’s on the back burner. It’s just the way he said it seemed off. Again, I am probably one of the few people in the world who has never watched Star Wars and nor do I have any willingness to do it. So the gimmick wasn’t knowledge until I actually looked it up on line. So sue me if I thought it was something else. I already mentioned in a previous post that it’s prob not something that is AI, but something I just didn’t pick up because I didn’t know much regarding SW.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 3:12 pm
by notscience
I’m not voting you yet mala but I’m worried my fears are true
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:29 pm
by Green Crayons
In post 35, Malakittens wrote:I kinda have to agree with Dunn that I saw Vot’s post regarding HK50 as a “why do they know so much about his posting style”
lol @ suspecting this as scummy
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:30 pm
by Green Crayons
eenie. meanie. miney. moe.
VOTE: farside
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:31 pm
by Green Crayons
also obviously mala's suspicion of votato is bad, and her back-burner nonsense is silly, but lol nonetheless at farside and notscience
But. Like. Anyone who has played videogames and likes Star Wars knows the reference. There's nothing to back burner.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:33 pm
by notscience
I don’t think she’s scummy for that I don’t like her 64 but I’m still reacquainting myself
I also just realized I told her I’m not voting her yet but my rvs is still on her and feel dumb
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:34 pm
by Green Crayons
What don't you like about 64?
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:36 pm
by notscience
It just seems too flippant for this early in the game. Over the top.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:40 pm
by Green Crayons
Seems within a reasonable band of emotion if she's not lying that she didn't get the reference that apparently the rest of the player set did.
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2020 4:41 pm
by notscience
I don’t really get the farside scumread either because I’ve been agreeing with every one of her posts
But no seriously I think her mala read makes decent sense especially given the info available thus far
Pedit-
Eh. Seemed over the top to me, but as I said I’m still getting reacquainted and it’s why I’m not pushing it besides my first comment and your questions.
