Mafiascum.net

meaningless wagon as all wagons are early on. UNVOTE:

in reference to Holden's questions btw

Aye

The vote count says “lynch”

I failed on my quest to get a page top.

That didnt really answer th' riddle I proposed.thats more of a general statement describing wagons as a whole during RVS. You disagreed with the fact that it seemed pork was making forced statements. With that in mind, what do you make of the ones pushing it like votato. Is it like ray where you think it's being frabicated, or is it more likely to be coming from town in your pov?

In post 54, Porkens wrote:The vote count says “lynch”

thats because we plan on lynching you.

In post 51, Mohab500 wrote:meaningless wagon as all wagons are early on. UNVOTE:

why does the wagon being meaningless make you want to unvote? why would you vote to begin with if it was meaningless?

In post 58, Craig Pelton wrote:VOTE: holden

Why?

holden's take on the mechanics was towny imo it's a bit bold for scum

Hello.

Bear with me since I rarely play setups besides the Newbie one, but is Holden being post-restricted? I don't remember which game it was that had a player similarly bound by pirate-speak.

I don't think so Homura. He said that he could stop translating it to pirate speech for someone to read better.

I be freely exercisin' me right t' speech t' speak like a pirate on me owns accord landlubber.

Or was this set up secretly a bastard game?

('tis an open game. 10 vts vs 3 goons if I recall correctly)

Right. It's open so no bastard mechanics like that anyway

Now then, I shall be extendin' (ToF) t' both ray 'n votato. Votato fer th' mindmeld o'er porky. Ray I currently am enjoyin' them diggin' at stuff on me, mohonk, 'n Craig.

Thar also th' point that scum!ray could o' rebuttal chemist read on me based on meta yet decided nah t'. If they were scum, I kinda expected them t' undermine t' keep th' wee push on me goin'.

sorry 'm late i was just training first aid and sailing in the lower decks

In post 27, Raya36 wrote:I find it interesting how Holden places an omgus vote on Votato. Then when two votes are placed (one for Holden, one for Votato) he engages with the player who voted for Votato

In post 29, Raya36 wrote:I get that conclusion from votato stating that there can be only one majestic equine then voting you. You're wording suggests intent to get a wagon on votato and the only reason for choosing votato seems to be him voting for you. Omgus is still omgus even if it's in rvs and banter. Then you engage with the player who votes votato as well and I also sense a light attempt at buddying this player.

crew mate Raya! i get if you're trying to move us out of RVS but this is reachy - you're talking about the 3rd and 5th posts in the game
i thought it was clear Holden's vote doesn't mean anything alignment indicative so him choosing to engage with someone that isn't where his vote is placed means nothing

i will assign 1 WtP (Walk the Plank) to Raya

~Eve

In post 39, Chemist1422 wrote:hello there

will be around more later

very scummy post - Misty usually enters with a-

hey guys

will catch up in a bit

-as town

~Eve

In post 68, Eevee wrote:

In post 39, Chemist1422 wrote:hello there

will be around more later

very scummy post - Misty usually enters with a-

hey guys

will catch up in a bit

-as town

~Eve

i like the donkey sheriff but i may just be charmed by his pirate speak

Mohab's questions about the setup in 9 look more for show and i don't get why she unvoted in 51 - why did you? also i'd argue early wagons aren't pointless but that's not an alignment-indicative discussion to have

1 High Seas goes to Holden
1 Walk the Plank goes to Mohab
VOTE: Mohab

~Eve

In post 66, HoldenGolden wrote:Now then, I shall be extendin'

toes o' friendship

(ToF) t' both ray 'n votato. Votato fer th' mindmeld o'er porky. Ray I currently am enjoyin' them diggin' at stuff on me, mohonk, 'n Craig.

Thar also th' point that scum!ray could o' rebuttal chemist read on me based on meta yet decided nah t'. If they were scum, I kinda expected them t' undermine t' keep th' wee push on me goin'.

Maybe I will accept your offer

In post 67, Eevee wrote:sorry 'm late i was just training first aid and sailing in the lower decks

In post 27, Raya36 wrote:I find it interesting how Holden places an omgus vote on Votato. Then when two votes are placed (one for Holden, one for Votato) he engages with the player who voted for Votato

In post 29, Raya36 wrote:I get that conclusion from votato stating that there can be only one majestic equine then voting you. You're wording suggests intent to get a wagon on votato and the only reason for choosing votato seems to be him voting for you. Omgus is still omgus even if it's in rvs and banter. Then you engage with the player who votes votato as well and I also sense a light attempt at buddying this player.

crew mate Raya! i get if you're trying to move us out of RVS but this is

very

reachy - you're talking about the 3rd and 5th posts in the game
i thought it was clear Holden's vote doesn't mean anything alignment indicative so him choosing to engage with someone that isn't where his vote is placed means nothing

i will assign 1 WtP (Walk the Plank) to Raya

~Eve

Reachy yes, but did we not get out of rvs?