Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 2:56 pm
ok random but there is the possibility of a town dayvig based on the setups and that would be kinda epic
where, at the part where you were pushing a pro-scum claiming strategy? yeah, i'm shaking.In post 48, DkKoba wrote:datisi are you trembling in scum chat rn about how much town im radiating <3 . <3
so you think what i was doing was a Scum move/Scum motivated?In post 52, Datisi wrote:where, at the part where you were pushing a pro-scum claiming strategy? yeah, i'm shaking.In post 48, DkKoba wrote:datisi are you trembling in scum chat rn about how much town im radiating <3 . <3
no, i think you'd do something like that regardless your alignment, if my memory from brass and shrapnel serves. i do think the public game claiming is -town EV.In post 54, DkKoba wrote:so you think what i was doing was a Scum move/Scum motivated?In post 52, Datisi wrote:where, at the part where you were pushing a pro-scum claiming strategy? yeah, i'm shaking.In post 48, DkKoba wrote:datisi are you trembling in scum chat rn about how much town im radiating <3 . <3
i will also pocket you both if i'm townIn post 53, Alduskkel wrote:i will absolutely pocket both of you if i'm scum
Did you, actually, read my nuance wrt game claiming?In post 55, Datisi wrote:no, i think you'd do something like that regardless your alignment, if my memory from brass and shrapnel serves. i do think the public game claiming is -town EV.In post 54, DkKoba wrote:so you think what i was doing was a Scum move/Scum motivated?In post 52, Datisi wrote:where, at the part where you were pushing a pro-scum claiming strategy? yeah, i'm shaking.In post 48, DkKoba wrote:datisi are you trembling in scum chat rn about how much town im radiating <3 . <3
is your nuance not this plus the "more info = more power" bit?In post 34, DkKoba wrote:after seeing multiple town losses from games i have moderated offsite due to lack of sharing of information, I am very much going to put stuff on the table to make solves easier
i'm more interested in thisIn post 45, DkKoba wrote:also imma give ppl the chance to speak but i already have a good idea of where i want to pivot my vote .
counterpoint: having players who are "clear"/likely town is a good concept after a nightkill has occurredIn post 61, Datisi wrote:counterpoint: how does it help us on day 2? what does it do for us other than spew some players VT?
give the readIn post 62, bugspray wrote:oh no oh no oh no i have a brain read but every time i give one this early i just get exe'd let me thinkg about this
you and the worst are scum partnersIn post 67, DkKoba wrote:give the readIn post 62, bugspray wrote:oh no oh no oh no i have a brain read but every time i give one this early i just get exe'd let me thinkg about this
youIn post 66, DkKoba wrote:counterpoint: having players who are "clear"/likely town is a good concept after a nightkill has occurredIn post 61, Datisi wrote:counterpoint: how does it help us on day 2? what does it do for us other than spew some players VT?
and im not going to push it until d2.
did he tell you to say this? you know this is a lieIn post 72, DkKoba wrote:u know it would be funny if we were actually in a mountainous
bugspray do u wanna know who this was going to be on?In post 45, DkKoba wrote:also imma give ppl the chance to speak but i already have a good idea of where i want to pivot my vote .