Mod Note: The flavor snippets in orange are actually written by my wife, Penguin_Alien.
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:28 am
by GrandpaMo
I actually also want to give some towncred to pooky for scumreading me.
I feel like yes in my opinion there are better scumreads then me, but I think you as town tried to find the logic (even though I disagree with that logic; because if anything based on how everything went, you should be pairing me with Fizz not JV lol) on why I said what I said have a possibility of scum.
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:31 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:32 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 48, GrandpaMo wrote:I said I agreed with Andante's weird impression on JV on how that may look scum lmao.
I guess the way I read it, it felt like you were agreeing with his statement but also kind of dismissing it in a way by saying you don't look at early game stuff,
it's like you want to defend JV but you don't? you know what I mean? :3
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:39 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
btw for you newbies,
here at Mafiascum, the most precious things in a players's collection are
pagetops
.
You might have noticed Skitter was particularly happy to snatch the 2nd pagetop of the game.
You might be asking yourself,
Well what is a pagetop? And why is it so important?
Well a pagetop is the first post of each page.
It is significant because it signifies you were the first person to post on the page and your post will sit supreme on top of the page for all eternity lording over its SUPERIOR status to all other posts that will follow.
This is an important part of the game because a player that can dominate the game with grabbing more pagetops than anyone else is clearly very skilled, fortunate, good looking, and incredibly charismatic.
Unscrupulous players of low moral standards will sometimes double, triple or even quadruple post to snatch pagetops, but this kind of practice is mostly frowned upon by true pagetop connoisseurs as being unsporting and improper.
anyway here is the first official pagetop scoreboard for this game:
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 6:43 am
by skitter30
In post 30, Andante wrote:Jackson/ Fizz though.. their entrances feel a little off, just a gut read though, obv I'll want more content and it's not enough for a vote, but I'm already a tad sus there
hmmm i'm not actually sure i see it for those two wrt their entrances
In post 48, GrandpaMo wrote:I said I agreed with Andante's weird impression on JV on how that may look scum lmao.
I guess the way I read it, it felt like you were agreeing with his statement but also kind of dismissing it in a way by saying you don't look at early game stuff,
it's like you want to defend JV but you don't? you know what I mean? :3
Oh I see. You are right, I did say that but once Andante pointed that out and I actually had to go you know check it out, then made Andante explain the reasonings, it made sense to me, hence why I said I agreed and stuff. I sorta see fizz's though? But I thought that was still normal imo.
since two others voted someone else to spark discussion
. I also will use it as an excuse of reaction testing. No worries here.
hmmm i'm not sure i follow the bolded?
I was mainly referring to what pooky said when I questioned them on if voting early was accetable and if you are able to unvote. Their response was more of random voting to "feel things out".
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:00 am
by Fizz Raab
Right, but at the same time, it's unfair to vote for someone on day 1 when there's no evidence from games I've seen on here on who's scum and who's not.
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:02 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 64, Fizz Raab wrote:Right, but at the same time, it's unfair to vote for someone on day 1 when there's no evidence from games I've seen on here on who's scum and who's not.
You can still unvote can't you?
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:05 am
by Andante
In post 64, Fizz Raab wrote:Right, but at the same time, it's unfair to vote for someone on day 1 when there's no evidence from games I've seen on here on who's scum and who's not.
I would rather vote out a scummy town than no one. we have 10 IRL days. no excuse for no elim
and i am currently winning the pagetop competition!!!
(assuming we discount cabd of course )
we can't disqualify the mod
unless he uses his like pagetop bot
>.>
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:08 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 64, Fizz Raab wrote:Right, but at the same time, it's unfair to vote for someone on day 1 when there's no evidence from games I've seen on here on who's scum and who's not.
we gotta break some eggs to make an omelette.
it is always optimal to elim someone rather than noone :3
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:09 am
by Andante
Ok so, post #34 from Grandpa, that isn't striking me as towny. Grandpa really backs off of me "I guess you have a good defense on why you did it" when all I did was quote the 2 entrances and say why I found them scummy.
I literally wasn't trying to defend anything, I was just pointing out why I was sus of them.
Immediately after that in #41 Pooky also mentioned something about that, Pooky is leaning town to me, Fizz and Grandpa are leaning scum. Fizz can not be suggesting a no elim out of a town mindset. Like, what is your plan for these 10 IRL days? not finding maf? like, we're not even guaranteed more info by choosing to no elim.
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:11 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
I dont think Fizz not wanting to vote is particularly +scum, I don't think its reasonable to expect no elim to actually happen
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:11 am
by Andante
Oh I posted before I was done...
skitter, what makes grandpa town?
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:12 am
by Fizz Raab
Yes, I hear what you're saying, but at the same time, there hasn't been any reason for me to vote on here so far.
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:13 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
voting and pressure is usually how you catch bad guys though
you can't just sit around and hope bad guys will serve themselves up to you on a platter.
]
if all the townies do nothing, and all the baddies do nothing, then we get nowhere :<
Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2021 7:13 am
by Andante
In post 70, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I dont think Fizz not wanting to vote is particularly +scum, I don't think its reasonable to expect no elim to actually happen
I want to hear more on his logic behind it though. like, we are here for 10 IRL days... we either have 1 investigative or no investigative roles, like, there is no benefit to a no elim and letting maf try to pick the investigate off