Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:00 pm
daddy
29 was seriousIn post 48, Iconeum wrote:i am in fact taking you here right now as being actually serious yesIn post 44, Datisi wrote:like saying i have an agenda to push you feels like you're taking the early on memes as a serious push and that's ??? not true?
talk to me about gypIn post 38, Iconeum wrote:gyp + geraint calling it
yes, eveyrone always replies with the "Oh, i've done it!" and i just picture themselves looking so pleased as they type that.In post 52, Datisi wrote:i've caught scum on page 3 before and whenever someone says that you can't read anyone's alignment for certain on day 1 i have a fucking stroke
In post 57, geraintm wrote:yes, eveyrone always replies with the "Oh, i've done it!" and i just picture themselves looking so pleased as they type that.In post 52, Datisi wrote:i've caught scum on page 3 before and whenever someone says that you can't read anyone's alignment for certain on day 1 i have a fucking stroke
So just imagine me giving you a slow clap and going Bravo! for your amazing achievement of being exactly correct as my 1 year old nephew if he was throwing darts at a photo of Prince Phillip
Does Datisi have an agenda or not?In post 38, Iconeum wrote:gyp + geraint calling it
In post 42, geraintm wrote:that is the way i generate my random vote, i do tat every game.In post 30, Iconeum wrote:i meanIn post 23, geraintm wrote:this was the 8t post after mine VOTE: datisiIn post 19, Datisi wrote:i am informed that i am town
i can see why your 'normal' playstyle gets you killed
no, i meant my normal way of playing is to sit back and just not move my votes very much, people hate it. i don't plan on being as like that from now on, and see how it goes (i fully expect people to go "Why is geraint so different from usual, lets vote him?")
I believe this.
Informed claims early day 1 are super unlikely to come from scum.
te straight up claim is because i have never been informed before in a game. i have zero idea what to do with it, so i thought to myself "lets keep this simple". I even said in my confirmation email to the mod that i planned to just announce it in my first post.
my thinking was - people should read me as town - this is just such a stupid thing to do if scum
second - i am assuming there is some sort of protective role/unkillable role on town side and they'd like to know about the strongman thing -
third - if i ever claimed after today it would just look weird - like an excuse to out someone or a lame town claim that couldn't be checked - so claim now
i see your page 3 scum catch and raise you a double scum investigation in a bracket of 3 at EoD 1In post 52, Datisi wrote:i've caught scum on page 3 before and whenever someone says that you can't read anyone's alignment for certain on day 1 i have a fucking stroke
best i can do is "gyp and gera less likely to be s/s because i don't think gyp comes out with a defense on their partner immediately, and against such a weak attack" but honestly i'm bullshittingIn post 56, Iconeum wrote:it's about 25% serious
gyp with the hard defence of that early claim for ?? reason, which already pinged me, and the townread on you during a 1v1 based on an easy reason
pleaseIn post 62, Gypyx wrote:actually hmmmm
given the claim, there's a possibility for it being ico + gera
not really stuff i'd bank on, just higher odds
VOTE: gypyxIn post 62, Gypyx wrote:actually hmmmm
given the claim, there's a possibility for it being ico + gera
not really stuff i'd bank on, just higher odds
then imagine me standing up and throwing flowers on stage for thisIn post 63, Iconeum wrote:i see your page 3 scum catch and raise you a double scum investigation in a bracket of 3 at EoD 1In post 52, Datisi wrote:i've caught scum on page 3 before and whenever someone says that you can't read anyone's alignment for certain on day 1 i have a fucking stroke
VOTE: gypyxIn post 62, Gypyx wrote:actually hmmmm
given the claim, there's a possibility for it being ico + gera
not really stuff i'd bank on, just higher odds
ongoing game kindaIn post 66, Iconeum wrote:pleaseIn post 62, Gypyx wrote:actually hmmmm
given the claim, there's a possibility for it being ico + gera
not really stuff i'd bank on, just higher odds
tell me more