Mafiascum.net

Votecount 1.1

KittyTacky

[3] - Vasex, NDMath, T3

Cabd

[2] - Save The Dragons, Enchant

Dunnstral

[1] - Kerset

Nero Cain

[1] - WindowsXP

deep-city-lights

[1] - samantha97

Not voting

- DeathNote, Andresvmb, Nero Cain, mozamis, Dunnstral, DrippingGoofball, Artemiana, Anya, KittyTacky, TheYankeeReaper, Rathe, deep-city-lights, Cabd

With 21 players alive, it will take 11 votes to achieve an elimination.

The deadline for Day 1 is Thursday, May 6 at 3:00 am EDT/7 GMT. You have (expired on 2021-05-06 03:00:00).

Mod Note

still seeking a replacement for mozamis and TheYankeeReaper.

In post 48, Enchant wrote:doesh't doing something for it self

Hard disagree.

I'm explicitly putting myself, as well as T3's opinions on kitty, to the forefront.

Putting an actual vote there doesnt really change anything.

WindowsXP wrote:Cabd why do you get wagoned d1 so much this is the 3rd time ive seen it

Because I prefer to make big moves early to generate data. It's practically rinse and repeat these days.

In post 33, Vasex wrote:

In post 30, KittyTacky wrote:Yes.

a townie's mistake?

Definitely.

T3 wrote:

In post 38, Cabd wrote:

In post 35, T3 wrote:KittyTacky pinging me as newbie scum here. Not sure if the current votes are RVS but VOTE: KittyTacky

Congrats on making a non random vote! Care to share with the class your reasoning? I don't think scum will be handing us a silver platter wrong thread post this game, so you'll have to try harder on this one if town~

Mostly the "I'm nervous", then when asked about it the tone felt too defensive for a town riding around RVS.

It seemed perhaps a bit too... aggressive? For an RVS push.

In post 38, Cabd wrote:

In post 35, T3 wrote:KittyTacky pinging me as newbie scum here. Not sure if the current votes are RVS but VOTE: KittyTacky

Congrats on making a non random vote! Care to share with the class your reasoning? I don't think scum will be handing us a silver platter wrong thread post this game, so you'll have to try harder on this one if town~

In post 40, Cabd wrote:

In post 32, Nero Cain wrote:kinda hate cabd's post but I already hate everything cabd anyways so...

I never did figure out why that is but you do you.

In post 41, Cabd wrote:

In post 39, T3 wrote:Mostly

And the other lesser reason?

Where

Can't see that, anime

You don't see how pressing T3 to express the specific reasoning for his kitty vote is me bringing that kitty vote and by extension myself and T3 and kitty to the forefront?

I don't know what to tell you, then.

In post 54, Cabd wrote:You don't see how pressing T3 to express the specific reasoning for his kitty vote is me bringing that kitty vote and by extension myself and T3 and kitty to the forefront?

I don't know what to tell you, then.

No.

Asking about reason doesh't count. You posted "Oh, can RVS already end pls", after he comes and places not RVS vote, then you jump asking about reasons of this vote. It happened after.

I swear I'm talking to a wall.

Then again our mason PT was like this too.

I'll post a readslist tomorrow when RVS is firmly over and I have something to push off of.

In post 56, Cabd wrote:I swear I'm talking to a wall.

Then again our mason PT was like this too.

Ironic to read this from you.

In post 34, NDMath wrote:

In post 10, KittyTacky wrote:VOTE: Gypyx

First posters are scum.

You missed. Unless that was intentional?
VOTE: kittytacky

I don't really understand this post?

In post 51, Cabd wrote:Because I prefer to make big moves early to generate data. It's practically rinse and repeat these days.

are u claiming that you try to intentionally get wagoned ala slayers gambit?

In post 59, Nero Cain wrote:are u claiming that you try to intentionally get wagoned ala slayers gambit?

Nah. I just like trying to force an early end to RVS OR just make a controversial split in the player list to force side taking to generate data and often people wagon me for that. It's not like I'm trying the old-school slayer's gambit.



Think of it like a submarine sending out ACTIVE sonar instead of passive sonar. You get a lot more information than from passive sonar, but you also draw attention to yourself.

Hey party people.

VOTE: T3

still, seems a bit similar no? Like if u force the player list to take sides then...even if you don't attribute alignment motivation its just noise and doing things for the sake of doing things

Guys we should REALLY REALLY vote T3 I swear great things will happen!?

you had me until that question mark

VOTE: kittytacky

Great things will happen!!

Better?

why are you asking if it's better

you should know if it's better

a leader isn't a leader without confidence

What leader? Everyone knows i should be one.

OK OK

*Begins to type delicate reasoning as to why T3 is scummy due his odd nature of seriousness in his reads*

Better?

In post 68, Enchant wrote:What leader? Everyone knows i should be one.

I townread you lots so I agree

In post 65, samantha97 wrote:you had me until that question mark

VOTE: kittytacky

What? I used it because it didn't quite seem apt to describe it as fully "aggressive". It was certainly pushy which is the word which I should have used now that I think about it.

better?

I'm gonna need you to tell people of the wonders of voting T3 while treating it as absolute fact that he is mafia

don't forget the great things

In post 71, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 65, samantha97 wrote:you had me until that question mark

VOTE: kittytacky

What? I used it because it didn't quite seem apt to describe it as fully "aggressive". It was certainly pushy which is the word which I should have used now that I think about it.