Mafiascum.net

In post 48, Lukewarm wrote:Marci is locktown, she promised me she is town this game

i remember promising this, but like ur confusing me! you looked like u didn't know if you could trust me earlier.

In post 50, marcistar wrote:

In post 48, Lukewarm wrote:Marci is locktown, she promised me she is town this game

i remember promising this, but like ur confusing me! you looked like u didn't know if you could trust me earlier.

This was a joke

Before we signed up together for this game, in the post game chat of the last game, I said "As long as you promise to be on my team next time, and not try to trick me like in this game"

In post 51, Lukewarm wrote:This was a joke

Before we signed up together for this game, in the post game chat of the last game, I said "As long as you promise to be on my team next time, and not try to trick me like in this game"

ah ah actually? im so bad with jokes LOL

In post 22, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Ok, i'm on a keyboard finally.
So my first nuanced thought is that it would be weird for Bingle to put himself in the 3P hood as scum when he was put in it as town in the last game and saw how bad it went for Skitter. I feel like Bingle would see himself as a much better player than me or N_M so for him to put himself in there seems really bold. N_M however, might feasibly do it for the memes.
But whatever i think we should eliminate in the 6P hood. Because then we can win in day 1 just like the last time Divide and Conquered was hosted.

I think we also have to consider that if we hit scum first or second in the 3p hood, the remaining player(s) become unremovable conftown. From that perspective I could imagine a scum!Bingle figuring conftown!NM or conftown!nEE doing less damage

I think 42 from Norwee feels like a genuine comment. N_M, do you think scum!Norwee is likely to post that?

I also have a light scumread on Lukewarm for the casual/flippant way he voted, ignoring N_M's 41, and a general vibe I get that he's buddying up to marcistar both here and in our neighborhood

In post 54, GuiltyLion wrote:I think 42 from Norwee feels like a genuine comment. N_M, do you think scum!Norwee is likely to post that?

He always says it

Which means it’s true.

In post 53, GuiltyLion wrote: I think we also have to consider that if we hit scum first or second in the 3p hood, the remaining player(s) become unremovable conftown. From that perspective I could imagine a scum!Bingle figuring conftown!NM or conftown!nEE doing less damage

I am not sure what you mean when you say they would be "unremovable conftown."

If we hit a mafia from the 3p neighborhood, we will have a confirmed town Day 2, but if we don't get the mafia until our second shot, wouldn't the other mafia automatically nightkill the last townie from the 3 people neighborhood?

In post 55, GuiltyLion wrote:I also have a light scumread on Lukewarm for the casual/flippant way he voted, ignoring N_M's 41, and a general vibe I get that he's buddying up to marcistar both here and in our neighborhood

Getting scumread for a casting a RVS vote on the first page of the thread. smh.

Although, I will admit that I am 100% buddying up to Marci, because the only reason I signed up for this game is because she asked me to sign up with her

oh lmao you're right, I read that the setup was Mountainous and assumed that meant no NKs for some reason

fully disregard that point then

In post 60, Lukewarm wrote:Getting scumread for a casting a RVS vote on the first page of the thread. smh.

I've caught scum on page 1 RVS votes before, this isn't even the only time just the first I remembered

It’s usually more pressing to get the 6p wolf as the scum in 3p would already be assigned to death from the start. Their only real requirement is to stay alive longer than the other 2 slots in the group and not give away their partner. Thusly it actually makes more sense for scum in the 3p to be occupied with pretend scum hunting inside of their own group (whuch they prob already planned out) than to hunt in the 6p group.
I will be a lot more occupied with who the scum are in the 6p and will only take into account that one of Bingle/N_M has their partner there.

In post 41, Not_Mafia wrote:

In post 29, Not_Mafia wrote:Eliminating down the 3p hood gives us at worst 3p ELo in the other group.. I'd sooner take that than the 1/6 chance for instawin. Unless someone starts jumping up and down and outs themselves as scum.

In post 39, Lukewarm wrote:My gut reaction to this set up, is that it makes more sense to eliminate from the 3 person neighborhood, unless someone from the 6 person neighborhood really stands out as a scum read.

Parrot in the thread

oop, somehow missed your original comment lol

But I mean, there are really only 2 ways to approach the game: vote someone in the 6 person neighborhood on Day 1 or vote someone in the 3 person neighborhood. So there is bound to be overlap in which way people are leaning.

Personally, I am curious why some people are suggesting to vote from the 6 person neighborhood instead? Is it just for the chance at a Day 1 endgame win? Or am I missing some other benefit to voting there.

I wouldn’t discount an GL/N_M team for example.
It is imperative that the 6P player be pretty good, while the 3p player might suck or be ready to sacrifice themselves.

In fact i think that's a pretty good way to get valuable info.
Players in the 3p should say their reads on the 6p group while the 6p players do the opposite.

In post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 60, Lukewarm wrote:Getting scumread for a casting a RVS vote on the first page of the thread. smh.

I've caught scum on page 1 RVS votes before, this isn't even the only time just the first I remembered

Can you really be upset with my RVS vote, when I managed to get a scum claim out of it?

In post 66, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In fact i think that's a pretty good way to get valuable info.
Players in the 3p should say their reads on the 6p group while the 6p players do the opposite.

Can I get a raincheck until after Bingle joins the thread. So far I have him down as "hard to read"

Also consider the fact that the 3p player would be VERY scared to see their partner get wagoned, while the 6p player would probably just buss.
Thus it is a lot more informative to lim in 6p group for day 1.

I'm not taking your jokes as 100% serious, but I do believe scum tend to use jokes in an attempt to be charismatic or to deflect scrutiny of their votes or scumreads. If you're town you'll be better served by not fixating on an early scumread on you and instead continuing to hunt the real mafias.

It's also odd to say I was "upset" with your RVS vote

GL what do you think about what i've just said?

In post 70, GuiltyLion wrote:I'm not taking your jokes as 100% serious, but I do believe scum tend to use jokes in an attempt to be charismatic or to deflect scrutiny of their votes or scumreads. If you're town you'll be better served by not fixating on an early scumread on you and instead continuing to hunt the real mafias.

It's also odd to say I was "upset" with your RVS vote

.... The spoiler was supposed to let you know that that post was also a joke, but here you are taking it serious as well.

Okay, time to put my serious hat on, no more jokes allowed.

@Lukewarm

Knock knock

In post 73, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Lukewarm

Knock knock

who's there?