Mafiascum.net

I think Seanzie's caginess is more likely to come from town then from scum.

I also think that Flubber's reaction to the caginess seems bad . I don't think that anyone would read Seanzie's post and actually think they were saying that posting=bad, and it was very obvious what he was actually saying.

VOTE: flubber

Also, happy birthday Umlaut

In post 47, Alchemist21 wrote:What are your reads looking like so far?

I'm quite bad at getting early reads tbh, they're nothing that I'd be very excited about.

In post 50, Lukewarm wrote:I think Seanzie's caginess is more likely to come from town then from scum.

I also think that Flubber's reaction to the caginess seems bad . I don't think that anyone would read Seanzie's post and actually think they were saying that posting=bad, and it was very obvious what he was actually saying.

VOTE: flubber

would you like me to join your wagon?

fear not, i am here!

so, as i was skimming the game earlier, flubber's 26 immediately struck me as awful. i thought it was obvious that seanzie disliked something alchemist wrote (and isn't saying what it is) rather than voting him purely because he "posted more". so i was pleasantly surprised to see umlaut's 29. i don't find the rest of flubber's posts to be better either.

VOTE: flubber

@flubber, what do you find ridiculous about 34?

another person that i kind of dislike right now is alchemist. something feels very scummy-nitpicky about his 39/41/43. like, it feels wrong that alch ia shading umlaut for not pressing seanzie while going for flubber just because umlaut didn't find coyness townie. umlaut found flubber's push to be suspicious so he went there, why would town!umlaut automatically have to be evaluating the pushee as well?

reading 36 and 42 was a mindmeld. by the laws of the mindmeld theory, i must now locktown umlaut, right? realistically, probably a bit too early, but i do have pretty townie pings from him so far.

In post 25, tris wrote:Datisi (2): Aristeia 9,

Lukewarm 10

In post 10, Lukewarm wrote:VOTE: Gamma

In post 54, Datisi wrote:fear not, i am here!

VOTE: Flubber

In post 42, Umlaut wrote:Why should I make any kind of post toward Seanzie? I read the thread, I saw Flubber joining a convenient wagon for disingenuous reasons, I voted him.

This post is really terrible. It feels like scum taking an RVS interaction way too seriously.

In post 54, Datisi wrote:

fear not, i am here!

so, as i was skimming the game earlier, flubber's 26 immediately struck me as awful. i thought it was obvious that seanzie disliked something alchemist wrote (and isn't saying what it is) rather than voting him purely because he "posted more". so i was pleasantly surprised to see umlaut's 29. i don't find the rest of flubber's posts to be better either.

VOTE: flubber

@flubber, what do you find ridiculous about 34?

another person that i kind of dislike right now is alchemist. something feels very scummy-nitpicky about his 39/41/43. like, it feels wrong that alch ia shading umlaut for not pressing seanzie while going for flubber just because umlaut didn't find coyness townie. umlaut found flubber's push to be suspicious so he went there, why would town!umlaut automatically have to be evaluating the pushee as well?

reading 36 and 42 was a mindmeld. by the laws of the mindmeld theory, i must now locktown umlaut, right? realistically, probably a bit too early, but i do have pretty townie pings from him so far.

I also hate this post.

you're free to elaborate.

In post 59, Datisi wrote:you're free to elaborate.

The weird mindmeld dancing around on umlaut.

that is bad because...?

This is too cute to be bad

"dancing around"

saying i fully agree with two posts umlaut made, making a joke about a recent game that some of us here played in, reaffirming that i do townread umlaut = "dancing around" = ??? bad ???

t3, are you *trying* to take flubber's place at the top of my shitlist?

In post 30, Flubbernugget wrote:You attack someone for attacking someone for...posting?

Chainsaw much?

This post is worse than the antagonizing post itself.

There’s not a lot more I have to add to this that hasn’t been said. Umlaut jumped on what we were all thinking.

Datisi felt different this game than the last one I played with him in a way I can’t word exactly, but noticed.

I think I understand what T3 meant actually. The lightheartness, perhaps, translates a bit strangely.

In post 66, Vulture wrote:I think I understand what T3 meant actually. The lightheartness, perhaps, translates a bit strangely.

You put it better than I could.

while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.

In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.

Let me have bad reads in peace.

It’s noticeable because it’s in the context of a townread. Whenever those are “cute” or friendly early on it raises my hackles.

VOTE: Flubber

In post 57, T3 wrote:

In post 42, Umlaut wrote:Why should I make any kind of post toward Seanzie? I read the thread, I saw Flubber joining a convenient wagon for disingenuous reasons, I voted him.

This post is really terrible. It feels like scum taking an RVS interaction way too seriously.

Do you get similar feelings from 26/30 by Flubber? If not, what makes them feel different?

Flubber's thing appeared to be reacting to something that wasn't totally RVS>

if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?

I actually mindmelded with Flubber but I take things very literally. So I am guessing that there's a tonal aspect to things.

I feel Umlaut flips scum here though.

VOTE: Umlaut

Happy Birthday. Sorry you got a red pm for it.