Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2021 1:55 am
In post 12, alstroemerial wrote:I genuinely found chimchar overrated
Natural scum progression!In post 25, alstroemerial wrote:Pagetop
Who even takes pagetops like that, anyway?!
In post 12, alstroemerial wrote:I genuinely found chimchar overrated
Natural scum progression!In post 25, alstroemerial wrote:Pagetop
if we're talking about the same game I think you're referring to, didn't that same person say they used 'tbh' constantly? Meaning it would be more NAI?In post 35, Roden wrote:Had a newbie game where someone said "tbh" over thirty times and turned out to be scum. They still won even after it was pointed out as a scum tell too.
VOTE: T3In post 48, T3 wrote:No. I'm saying that scum going for Tracker in a 50/50 nk/kill tracker isn't worth it if it fails.In post 47, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you suggesting that Scum will not used their NK if we do this strategy?In post 46, T3 wrote:Mafia not killing anyone is worse than them killing a VT. It's not logical for them to take that risk.
@LQ: So, I covered this in a previous newbie game where I subbed out, so for the sake of Roden & T3 who were also in the game where I answered this question, I'll go into more deets:In post 31, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is everyone's experience playing Mafia?
I mean... I'm not immediately sus of T3's suggestion tbh. I understand your POV, & granted it's a good tool to bring a conf-town into late game, but I like the idea of clearing one potential townie D1 to reduce our elimination pool.In post 53, MargotRosa wrote:Switching vote to T3 for what is either some wild scummy behaviour, or a galaxy brain townie that will lead us astray anyway.
If we reveal who tracker is, scum knows who tracker is. They also know that, whatever the setup, there is one town PR left, and if they manage to snipe them, they can take out the tracker, who they 100% already know. Town is automatically far more likely to lose both power roles, if chance alone is factored in.
It's not just about whether or not the tracker is a good role or not. It gives scum info about which of the three setups they're dealing with. Plus, if town is going to eliminate tracker, we can give them the opportunity to reveal their role before they go down. Hiding the info from scum is way more valuable than giving town the info when that info can be given to us before we eliminate them in the unlikely incidence that they do get voted as scumIn post 55, Clasko wrote: I mean... I'm not immediately sus of T3's suggestion tbh. I understand your POV, & granted it's a good tool to bring a conf-town into late game, but I like the idea of clearing one potential townie D1 to reduce our elimination pool.
Like, Tracker's kinda meh anyway, until there's only one Mafia left and then, at that point, Tracker can start conf-towning the people who didn't visit, kinda like a pseudo-cop, but it's contingent on correctly eliminating Mafia D1 to be fully effective.
Don't like this vote. IIRC there was something like this brought up in past Newbie games.In post 53, MargotRosa wrote:VOTE: T3In post 48, T3 wrote:No. I'm saying that scum going for Tracker in a 50/50 nk/kill tracker isn't worth it if it fails.In post 47, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you suggesting that Scum will not used their NK if we do this strategy?In post 46, T3 wrote:Mafia not killing anyone is worse than them killing a VT. It's not logical for them to take that risk.
Switching vote to T3 for what is either some wild scummy behaviour, or a galaxy brain townie that will lead us astray anyway.
If we reveal who tracker is, scum knows who tracker is. They also know that, whatever the setup, there is one town PR left, and if they manage to snipe them, they can take out the tracker, who they 100% already know. Town is automatically far more likely to lose both power roles, if chance alone is factored in.
If we don't reveal tracker, the likelihood that town randomly loses both PRs by d3 is 2/7 * 1/6 = ~4.8% chance. This is not even taking into account whether we have a doctor, and if we do, that chance is lessened even more.
On the other hand, if we do reveal tracker, the chance that we lose both PRs by d3 is the chance of randomly picking the doctor out of the remaining 6 townies, allowing them to kill the tracker n2, giving 1/6 = ~17% chance. Here, there is no real doctor to lessen the chance further, as doc needs to protect tracker on the off chance scum play a wild card and kill tracker as a fake (risk of this happening is higher than the probability of randomly picking the 1/6 townie that scum will also target).
That is how much we screw ourselves by revealing a role. <4.8% chance of randomly losing both PRs goes up to ~17% chance.
As T3 is a seasoned forum player, I'd expect them to know this, or have at least observed it. Absolutely scum read on T3.
Don't like that I'm voting your friend huh?In post 58, Astra wrote:I'm still unsure about the tracker stuff but not necessarily sus of T3 for it
on the other hand I'm not vibing Lickety at all. He's got enough posts toseemengaged just via postcount but there's next to no substance in any of them
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
I cant even say hi to my fellow towniesIn post 26, Astra wrote:"fellow townies"
VOTE: HockeyFan
A decent amount in person. Played some online mafia like several years ago as well
Uh i've played about a year on a chat site called mafia.gg and just started playing fourm recentlyIn post 31, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is everyone's experience playing Mafia?
In post 35, Roden wrote:RQS is a scum tell. It's an irrelevant question that's just there to make you look busy.In post 31, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is everyone's experience playing Mafia?
Disagree. RQS allows for some discussion. It also makes people get a feel of other people. So, Why do you dislike it
VOTE: LQ
Had a newbie game where someone said "tbh" over thirty times and turned out to be scum. They still won even after it was pointed out as a scum tell too.In post 34, Egix96 wrote:I've been playing on MS semi-regularly since I joined.In post 31, LicketyQuickety wrote:What is everyone's experience playing Mafia?
It's nothing major, but it's simply that scum sometimes have a tendency to overuse words that they think will "sound" more towny.In post 33, MargotRosa wrote:What do you have against honesty?In post 30, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: Margot
You're forgetting that the D/P remakes are coming out later this year. Also, "honestly" tell.
P.S. Hockey is town on vibes.
wutIn post 51, Clasko wrote:@Hockey if you seriously meant to combine Cringe + Chimchar to make a new word then I'm legit lowkey mad at you but I appreciate the word play.
Thanks for the pocket, will pocket u backIn post 30, Egix96 wrote:VOTE: MargotIn post 27, MargotRosa wrote:Hey there! Never played in forum format, but played a lot of quick chat room format a few years ago after playing a bit with my university drama society, because of course that was a hotbed of RP games
Honestly, having hard opinions on a gen of Pokemon starters that aren't 1 or the most recent one in 2021 is pretty sus.
VOTE: Roden
You're forgetting that the D/P remakes are coming out later this year. Also, "honestly" tell.
P.S. Hockey is town on vibes.
uh can u elaborate on this? 10 posts is not a lot imo, also I dont know why u execpted any real substance >1 irl day into the gameIn post 58, Astra wrote:I'm still unsure about the tracker stuff but not necessarily sus of T3 for it
on the other hand I'm not vibing Lickety at all. He's got enough posts toseemengaged just via postcount but there's next to no substance in any of them
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
In post 65, alstroemerial wrote:In terms of the tbh tell, the last time I tried to apply it, it led me astray because, as mentioned above, the person just talked (wrote?) like that. I've seen games where it is a notable difference in someone's style, but I suspect in newbie games it will generally be harder to apply.
I think its more valuable to see whether that statement where they said "tbh" comes from a scum motive then to scumhunt via a tell that probably doesnt even work
Also, I am in the camp that there is no need for a tracker to claim on page 3, or even Day 1 for that matter unless they get close to elimination. Still, this is the sort of gambit that I've discovered is well within T3's wheelhouse so I don't see it as particularly indicative.
I didn't vote for anyone before that, lol.
Probably shouldn't say this.In post 55, Clasko wrote:I'm not a Tracker, though, to hopefully get the ball rolling but three people have expressed their disdain for the suggestion, or at least questioned the effectiveness of it, so.
Tracker might die, and we also have a conftown.In post 49, Astra wrote:Ah ok I see. Even if it's the case they don't go for the tracker, what's the pro of the tracker claiming day 1 rather than day 2?
I do know this, but having 2 IC's on Day 2 isIn post 53, MargotRosa wrote:VOTE: T3In post 48, T3 wrote:No. I'm saying that scum going for Tracker in a 50/50 nk/kill tracker isn't worth it if it fails.In post 47, LicketyQuickety wrote:Are you suggesting that Scum will not used their NK if we do this strategy?In post 46, T3 wrote:Mafia not killing anyone is worse than them killing a VT. It's not logical for them to take that risk.
Switching vote to T3 for what is either some wild scummy behaviour, or a galaxy brain townie that will lead us astray anyway.
If we reveal who tracker is, scum knows who tracker is. They also know that, whatever the setup, there is one town PR left, and if they manage to snipe them, they can take out the tracker, who they 100% already know. Town is automatically far more likely to lose both power roles, if chance alone is factored in.
If we don't reveal tracker, the likelihood that town randomly loses both PRs by d3 is 2/7 * 1/6 = ~4.8% chance. This is not even taking into account whether we have a doctor, and if we do, that chance is lessened even more.
On the other hand, if we do reveal tracker, the chance that we lose both PRs by d3 is the chance of randomly picking the doctor out of the remaining 6 townies, allowing them to kill the tracker n2, giving 1/6 = ~17% chance. Here, there is no real doctor to lessen the chance further, as doc needs to protect tracker on the off chance scum play a wild card and kill tracker as a fake (risk of this happening is higher than the probability of randomly picking the 1/6 townie that scum will also target).
That is how much we screw ourselves by revealing a role. <4.8% chance of randomly losing both PRs goes up to ~17% chance.
As T3 is a seasoned forum player, I'd expect them to know this, or have at least observed it. Absolutely scum read on T3.
In post 40, MargotRosa wrote:I use honestly and tbh a lot. Will try to keep that in mind lol.In post 37, Roden wrote:If you're asking about the RQS scum tell sample size, you've been on this site long enough to know that one.
If it's the "tbh" tell I'm not sure how you expect me to source that unless you want me to comb through every newbie game and CTRL+F scum ISO's for "tbh" and "honestly". Which uh, I'm not gonna do. But I'm clearly not the only one who's heard of that tell anyway.
And personality appreciate the RQS stuff. Light atmosphere to start the game, which I imagine will get quite testy
I wouldn't hard accuse anyone for it, the tbh tell was me commenting on Egix bringing it up and backing it up with my own belief in it. It's nothing I'd bother trying to use on Day 1 though, I think it's reasonable that people use it naturally in their speech patterns. It's just when you have people using it sparingly or never in their confirmed town games and then blatantly overusing it in games they're suspicious in, then I think it has merit.In post 52, Clasko wrote:if we're talking about the same game I think you're referring to, didn't that same person say they used 'tbh' constantly? Meaning it would be more NAI?In post 35, Roden wrote:Had a newbie game where someone said "tbh" over thirty times and turned out to be scum. They still won even after it was pointed out as a scum tell too.
I'm not necessarily against considering the frequency someone uses a certain word to determine whether they're scum when analysing them as town v. scum, but it wouldn't be the end-all-be-all for me IMO, and it sort of lends itself towards 'meta' and IDK if I'm prepared to go there yet.
I mean, prolonging RQS and to keep talking about it beyond your first few posts is sus sure. But the person who did RQS this game(Lickety), did not prolong and even got some /starter/ reads(Only serious read is the TR on me, but still, Lickety did get some info, so sure RQS may be easy town cred for little effort but Idt thats the case in this gameIn post 72, Roden wrote:In post 40, MargotRosa wrote:I use honestly and tbh a lot. Will try to keep that in mind lol.In post 37, Roden wrote:If you're asking about the RQS scum tell sample size, you've been on this site long enough to know that one.
If it's the "tbh" tell I'm not sure how you expect me to source that unless you want me to comb through every newbie game and CTRL+F scum ISO's for "tbh" and "honestly". Which uh, I'm not gonna do. But I'm clearly not the only one who's heard of that tell anyway.
And personality appreciate the RQS stuff. Light atmosphere to start the game, which I imagine will get quite testyI wouldn't hard accuse anyone for it, the tbh tell was me commenting on Egix bringing it up and backing it up with my own belief in it. It's nothing I'd bother trying to use on Day 1 though, I think it's reasonable that people use it naturally in their speech patterns. It's just when you have people using it sparingly or never in their confirmed town games and then blatantly overusing it in games they're suspicious in, then I think it has merit.In post 52, Clasko wrote:if we're talking about the same game I think you're referring to, didn't that same person say they used 'tbh' constantly? Meaning it would be more NAI?In post 35, Roden wrote:Had a newbie game where someone said "tbh" over thirty times and turned out to be scum. They still won even after it was pointed out as a scum tell too.
I'm not necessarily against considering the frequency someone uses a certain word to determine whether they're scum when analysing them as town v. scum, but it wouldn't be the end-all-be-all for me IMO, and it sort of lends itself towards 'meta' and IDK if I'm prepared to go there yet.
My opinion on RQS doesn't seem popular, but I've been burned a few times by people who try to look helpful/busy by engaging in RQS but then turn out to be scum. It's easy town cred for too little effort IMO.