Page 3 of 18

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:15 pm
by Taly
I think I can only interact with
Nancy/Gamma
right now if I'm drunk.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:45 pm
by Deimos27
Struggling to read Nancy vs jjh
Happy to sheep the townreads on miller claim

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:52 pm
by Deimos27
Why is Sakura town, Titus?

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:53 pm
by Deimos27
Or someone to "let go", anyway

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:54 pm
by Deimos27
Is Victorine an alt

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:57 pm
by Titus
In post 54, Deimos27 wrote:Is Victorine an alt
I suspect so

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:58 pm
by Titus
In post 52, Deimos27 wrote:Why is Sakura town, Titus?
Gut/tone

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:58 pm
by Titus
Plus I want her townread so no excuses

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 12:58 pm
by Deimos27
Hmm

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:31 pm
by Victorine
I am one player with a flavor of a different player.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 2:01 pm
by Taly
Mind sharing your protection over
Sakura, Titus
?

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 2:51 pm
by Deimos27
In post 59, Victorine wrote:I am one player with a flavor of a different player.
Oh right I forgot you're in here
So no Romans today

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 2:51 pm
by Deimos27
Weird post restriction then

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 3:35 pm
by Taly
To be candid
Deimos
, I was frustrated with the thread seeming to give mixed signals on my alignment and I figured scum was easily able to perpetuate that narrative.

But I channeled the feeling into aggression because I wanted to turn the pressure back onto the thread. Now I see better who has approached my slot from a likelier informed or uninformed perspective.

So yeah, my emotion is sincere, but I often angle it to ground myself reading of the game.

I'm a trip to play with and try to read st face value for the first time :wink:

This PT is good because I can give you insight about my thoughts that I would otherwise withhold publicly.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 7:08 pm
by Titus
In post 60, Taly wrote:Mind sharing your protection over
Sakura, Titus
?
I literally just said it. I want her townread so she has no excuses not to contribute.

Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 7:08 pm
by Titus
With four people here, I find it highly unlikely we are all town.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:41 am
by Clemency
hello neigbourinos

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:52 am
by Titus
With 5 in here, I highly doubt this is pure.

Hi Clemency.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:46 am
by Deimos27
Hi Clem!

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:48 am
by Deimos27
I don't know what to think of so I will think nothing for the time being and just keep you townlean.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:52 am
by Deimos27
I'm still happy to think there's scum in {Gamma, Datisi}.
I think Gamma was really stretching for the Ircher SR and I think they're really stretching for the Datisi SR. Not to say I think Datisi is town, just that I think Gamma has the wrong reasons to think he isn't.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:01 am
by Deimos27
Spoiler:
In post 777, Deimos27 wrote:I don't remember making an argument for town!Ircher. I moved off him because I sr Gamma's sr of him.
It's not impossible that's a bus ofc but if it can just as well be explained as SvT I prefer Gamma.
In post 778, Good Luck Buddy wrote:Ohh i think someone else said it. Now i have to go back and reread
In post 780, Good Luck Buddy wrote:anyways my thought of him not being scum was him doing this exact same thing where he posts this really early random feeling weak list of reads and he was town doing it. He also got scumread to death for it. I don't think this makes ircher = town; but it does mean my initial weak scumread mean absolutely nothin right now

I don't think it's out of the question that this false memory of me making a "valid point" for town-Ircher is a result of access to the argument I made in this thread that Gamma's SR of Ircher was bad (I said stuff like that the readslist is "clearly RVSy" and to suggest certain obviously ironic aspects of it are serious is "ridiculous")

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:07 am
by Deimos27
In which case either
1) PookyBringer is in this thread and choosing not to post
or
2) PookyBringer is scum and their scumbuddy in this thread shared my analysis in the scum PT
or
3) PookyBringer for some other reason has a PT with someone in this thread who shared the analysis

In case (2) or (3) I can totally see why a cursory reading of a quote or secondhand account posted in a scum PT could easily result in the false assumption/memory that the quote came from the main thread.

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:08 am
by Deimos27
Maybe a bit tinfoil hat, but thoughts?

Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:12 am
by Deimos27
If that's indeed a scumslip, which I am inclined to read it as, then it also confirms that there is indeed scum among us 5.