Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:12 am
pagetop
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
You know what DARBY is still scum
I mean tonal dissonance is scummyIn post 32, ben dover123 wrote:Ugh personality. I hate these kind of excuses.In post 28, Egix96 wrote:Only the first of those quotes feels forced imo. It could just be a personality thing.In post 27, ben dover123 wrote:Spoiler: quotes
Pan Smierc wrote:In post 18, redtea wrote:co-mod ego, have fun~scumclaimPan Smierc wrote:ok nice i fixed my sigPan Smierc wrote:Why=fry
I dislike this stream-of-consciousness posting. It feels like that 'jokey' breaking the ice thing that scum try to do in RVS.
I like guilty until proven innocent.
why? sequencing felt to me like:In post 41, Pan Smierc wrote:t3 town
yes i dont like this. wont be surprising if i sheep you this game.In post 43, ben dover123 wrote:If you're gonna do a RT at least do it right.
^Pan Smierc wrote:t3 town
T3
---------- purge line ----------
everyone else
Pan
P-edit:??? You have 1 vote other than yourself.Pan Smierc wrote:Me posting intentionally scummy to get attention and move the game along: cool and good
Me actually reaping votes from it: *pika surprise face*
Why?In post 23, Pan Smierc wrote:Why=fry
Why?In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.
before the end people said i talk weird and it got me labelled as scum by a few town people. its not the first time but usually people dont treat me as alignment indicativeIn post 58, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:Why?In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.
the cheeky insistence however deserves a townread
You got locktowned in a recent game though once you talked for a while just do that and you should be fine!In post 59, cool cookie wrote:before the end people said i talk weird and it got me labelled as scum by a few town people. its not the first time but usually people dont treat me as alignment indicativeIn post 58, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:Why?In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.
I wasn't sure if the vote was random or not.In post 54, cool cookie wrote:why? sequencing felt to me like:In post 41, Pan Smierc wrote:t3 town
1. T3 makes random vote claiming "hard scumread"
2. T3 makes a point of acknowledging the "hard scumread" bit was not serious (slightly odd thing to clarify as it was obvious)
3. T3 calls out somebody for also transparently random voting on the same wagon, also slightly odd.
so my starting point is t3 mildly scummy.
In other related news VOTE: dArby
So are you saying we should scumread you...?In post 65, T3 wrote:something town me is really bad at is Getting Townread
in all my recent scum games except one i've endgamed
Some people are just not talking and its making everything really hard to read ugh.In post 69, Pan Smierc wrote:The activity in this game is so slow, what gives?
Out of policy this can go.In post 58, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:Why?In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.
Do you not think that there's enough content to be able to form even a couple of rudimentary reads? Thus kinda feels like you're just trying to take an easy way out.In post 72, DArby wrote:Out of policy this can go.In post 58, IOnlyAskWhy wrote:Why?In post 55, cool cookie wrote:My way of words was a bit controversial in my last game.
VOTE: Why