Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2021 5:24 am
Oh, hi Galron. Long time no see.
If the theory is bad, why do you subscribe to it?In post 53, mc esther wrote:ive only ever seen the self-vote reaction test used by town. i could guess at reasons for this (mafia not wanting to draw attention to themself, mafia not wanting to do something daft that gets them policy-eliminated, the fact that moving the game out of rvs benefits town), but the theory behind it is far less relevant to me (because i think it's bad and shouldnt happen regardless) than what ive tended to observe.
In post 56, Galron wrote:Suss that A50 isn't shitposting as much as he should be.
I hate to shoot your theory down, but I have witnessed scum self-voting in RVS, and it was to avoid alienating others early. IIRC they said it was because they "didn't know whom to vote".In post 53, mc esther wrote:ive only ever seen the self-vote reaction test used by town. i could guess at reasons for this (mafia not wanting to draw attention to themself, mafia not wanting to do something daft that gets them policy-eliminated, the fact that moving the game out of rvs benefits town), but the theory behind it is far less relevant to me (because i think it's bad and shouldnt happen regardless) than what ive tended to observe.
You're approaching LAL territory with this statement. I am the top poster of this game as we speak, and I have yet to say one meaningful word.In post 56, Galron wrote:Suss that A50 isn't shitposting as much as he should be.
Oh yeah? Well.. yeah I'll show you something something grumble mumble...In post 59, Almost50 wrote:You're approaching LAL territory with this statement. I am the top poster of this game as we speak, and I have yet to say one meaningful word.In post 56, Galron wrote:Suss that A50 isn't shitposting as much as he should be.
the observation that specific [imo] anti-town behaviours tend to come from town, is not the same thing as endorsing those behaviours, does that clarify what i meant?In post 54, Galron wrote:If the theory is bad, why do you subscribe to it?In post 53, mc esther wrote:ive only ever seen the self-vote reaction test used by town. i could guess at reasons for this (mafia not wanting to draw attention to themself, mafia not wanting to do something daft that gets them policy-eliminated, the fact that moving the game out of rvs benefits town), but the theory behind it is far less relevant to me (because i think it's bad and shouldnt happen regardless) than what ive tended to observe.
Why did you unvote Enchant here, mc?
No. Apparently my sarcasm didn't come across the interwebzIn post 68, Pavowski wrote:Are you guys like... Seriously arguing about A50's alignment?
You're not, right?
There's a difference between towny in the sense of meaningful town contribution, and towny due to higher likelihood of coming from town.In post 48, Galron wrote:How are either of those things townie?In post 44, mc esther wrote:i guess rvs joke-voting the inno is loosely town, in that it's kinda similar to rvs self-vote gambits.
The structure of this first post: [vote, justification, townread] comes off as scummy to meIn post 62, GuiltyLion wrote:Hello hello old friends and new
VOTE: Roden
Didn't like his first post, I think using a past game to justify RVS vote is inherently a lil awkward
Also I like Galron for town