Mafiascum.net

You are not helping your case, scumDatisi.

I explained exactly what the game delay was about - the mod team decided that my username was not acceptable and they told me to switch the name of my account. This is not something I would lie about.

In post 40, Frogsterking wrote:Yeet is talking about depressing non-game related topics and is townreading me despite doing nothing but instantly shading their slot unironically at start of game.

What? How are they depressing non-game topics and do you object to me/dats saying your entrance was +town and why is shading their slow unironically scummy (and i'm not sure they were even shading their slot either ...)

~

not sure i like 42

In post 49, tenebrousluminary wrote:Salutations. Yeet and any others whom it may concern, you may call me teneb or tl if that is easier. I also respond to "hey you."

I would like to think that the game delay is notsomething we should read into, so I won't.

Okay can you elaborate?

Frogsterking is confirmed town to me. I will not accept any vote on Frogsterking.

Frogsterking, we really don't need to make a big deal out of the game start delay.

In post 50, Yeet wrote:You are not helping your case, scumDatisi.

what case? "subliminally signaling" you have made a good vote by openly telling you you have made a good vote?

On the other hand, Datisi is most likely scum this game.

VOTE: Datisi

Post 39 feels unnatural to me.

Frogsterking, you may need to do some research on what to expect from this game.

In post 47, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 42, fireisredsir wrote:VOTE: frogsterking for making the first thread of serious conversation in this game be a really dumb one

42 fireisred trying to shut down scumhunting during start of day noted

getting people engaged in talking about thr game delay and who may be scum as a result of it is directly counterproductive to scumhunting bc it's dumb and is not going to result in anything useful

cmv

In post 58, tenebrousluminary wrote:VOTE: Datisi

Post 39 feels unnatural to me.

Frogsterking, you may need to do some research on what to expect from this game.

I also don’t like 39. I don’t like the way Datisi is engaging the thread.

In post 56, Datisi wrote:

In post 50, Yeet wrote:You are not helping your case, scumDatisi.

what case? "subliminally signaling" you have made a good vote by openly telling you you have made a good vote?

Datisi, this feels a bit intense for the context

DeasVail, would you also vote Datisi?

VOTE: tenebro

yeet may or may not be town, tenebro probably isn't

I also wouldn’t mind getting Datisi hammered soon.

In post 61, DeasVail wrote:

In post 56, Datisi wrote:

In post 50, Yeet wrote:You are not helping your case, scumDatisi.

what case? "subliminally signaling" you have made a good vote by openly telling you you have made a good vote?

Datisi, this feels a bit intense for the context

>_>

it was supposed to be jokey in tone. there is no case.

I can guarantee at least one scum has posted.

In post 59, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 47, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 42, fireisredsir wrote:VOTE: frogsterking for making the first thread of serious conversation in this game be a really dumb one

42 fireisred trying to shut down scumhunting during start of day noted

getting people engaged in talking about thr game delay and who may be scum as a result of it is directly counterproductive to scumhunting bc it's dumb and is not going to result in anything useful

cmv

I mean while their approach is wrong, they did immediately give us something to talk abt and thus got the game moving, i dont think thats counterprodictive to scumhunting at all

~

I'm not really sure why people are disliking dats thus far, he's been largely nai to me

Save the Dragons is also town.

In post 62, Yeet wrote:DeasVail, would you also vote Datisi?

I appreciate the question and believe it comes from a good place, but I'm not feeling it quite yet. I'm intrigued by Datisi's approach so far, but have not decided what it comes from.

PEdit @Datisi. Ah, that makes sense. I still think your posting was somewhat provocative so I think it's totally expected that Yeet would be concerned by it. Was that what you expected also?

In post 63, Datisi wrote:VOTE: tenebro

yeet may or may not be town, tenebro probably isn't

Because?

In post 52, skitter30 wrote:

In post 40, Frogsterking wrote:Yeet is talking about depressing non-game related topics and is townreading me despite doing nothing but instantly shading their slot unironically at start of game.

What? How are they depressing non-game topics and do you object to me/dats saying your entrance was +town and why is shading their slow unironically scummy (and i'm not sure they were even shading their slot either ...)

~

not sure i like 42

It's non game related for TOWN because it doesn't help with scumhunting, I think it's believable you and Dats +town my entrance so I'm not objecting to it OR returning you or Dats +town back because it could just be a pocket attempt from you.

What is nai?

In post 67, skitter30 wrote:I'm not really sure why people are disliking dats thus far, he's been largely nai to me

This feels like shutting down the scum-Datisi train of possibility without actually being interested in it.

In post 64, Yeet wrote:I also wouldn’t mind getting Datisi hammered soon.

That's a bad idea.
Hammering people very early on is bad because we have less time to discuss and we're probably defenstrating a townie.