Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 8:56 am
Why didn't NAHA and CSF just vote for... anyone other than each other? There was literally no way CSF could have gotten out of being eliminated there after NAHA submitted.
Wtf do u meanIn post 50, Fidget wrote:Why didn't NAHA and CSF just vote for... anyone other than each other? There was literally no way CSF could have gotten out of being eliminated there after NAHA submitted.
I don’t think anyone is saying otherwise? but had I been in that pt, I too would have voted CSF because she was pretty much saying nothing other than that mafia should decide the elim.In post 57, DkKoba wrote:i did the best i could in that gamestate and i stand by it
I'm not really saying you didn't do the best you could. I don't think there was a whole alot more u coulda done. I just thought the terminators could have gotten away with sticking together so it surprised me to see CSF as scum thereIn post 57, DkKoba wrote:i did the best i could in that gamestate and i stand by it
what the fuck is this OGI bullshitIn post 1117, Radical Rat wrote:Yeah, and that's the situation I expected to be in this morning.In post 1112, Aisa wrote:I can confirm every factual claim that Gamma has made.
RR, if you want the exact end of day 1 votecount, it was:
NAHA: Loki, Gamma, CSF, Fidget, Aisa
CSF: NAHA
I'm somewhat surprised no one has brought up this angle yet. Or maybe this is what Gamma means, idk, but I think it's a slightly different angle:
If there were 3 scum in my PT, they literally could have controlled the day 1 elimination and gone on to eliminate or kill all 3 townies in the PT (plus one in the other PT), thus automatically getting the game to 4:3 eLo.
The fact this didn't happen is somewhat short of a perfect clear, but IMO fairly close.
Also, FWIW, I think Gamma kinda towntold in the PT anyway.
This is obviously easy for me to say, but I am pretty keen for the 3-scum-in-one-PT theory to die down pretty soon.
I don't think they mutual bus like that in a triple scum world though, so I'm willing to say final scum was in our group now.
Now then. Andante's ragequit probably spews that slot Town, as well as townreading her beforehand. Ejjinami townslipped, and was also an existing townread. So that leaves Vivax/Enchant, and I'm not really fond of Vivax's entrance today, so let's start there, yeah?
VOTE: Vivax
So RR is misrepresenting?In post 66, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I think you are allowed to comment on a replacement after it happens
but she did not ragequit
Pooky, Andante and myself formed a covenant and the three of us all made a vow of secrecy which we signed with our own blood and all of us also pinky swore to nominate Pooky for a scummie for this game, because he bribed us.In post 68, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I can't comment on RR's state of mind when they make a comment because I am not a psychic.
it shouldnt be allowed tbqhIn post 66, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I think you are allowed to comment on a replacement after it happens
but she did not ragequit
ehhh I can see where RR is thinking that, our PT was… interesting..In post 67, Freedom wrote:So RR is misrepresenting?In post 66, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I think you are allowed to comment on a replacement after it happens
but she did not ragequit
That's true.In post 72, Andante wrote:from my understanding you can say whatever you want in game about a replacement after it happens, just not before it happens
unfortunately, I'm a fairly straightforward read for good tonereaders. I'm pretty sure you correctly scumread me in Pokemon tooIn post 52, Firebringer wrote:Spicy my gut on cat was right