Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:21 am
Mod, can we gat a vote count please?
Correction made.Percy wrote:@Mod: I voted Baby Spice here.
I've had time to read, but it's too late for me to brain writing a post. My vote is staying where it is, and I'll put a post together tomorrow.
Sotty7 wrote:I am tempted by a promised Babyspice wagon but Red is looking worse and worse to me. I don't understand how people can say his posts are townie like. The only person I am willing to leave Red for now is Nikanor.
You realise that I'm actually voting for the person with the most votes who isn't you, right? I wasn't complaining, I meant exactly what I said; Red isn't (wasn't) defending himself, and no-one else is arguing that person X looks worse than Red, so my vote stays.Percy wrote:Yeah, well, I'm fighting for my life here, and you cbf looking at alternatives - you're just going to complain that no-one else is looking!
Different from Hoopla's game.RedCoyote wrote:I don't know, Elmo. Do you mean different in the course of this game or different from Hoopla's game?
You cannot seriously be implying that I haven't clearly laid out why I'm voting you or that I don't have good reasons to suspect you.RedCoyote wrote:I'm sorry they're not as well thought out as "he sounds like an old man".
No.RedCoyote wrote:Is there anything about Fur that strikes you as particularly town?
I don't see why at all. Your reasoning is completely independent from my opinions, which youRedCoyote wrote:It's hard for me to explain why exactly those things are scummy if we have such a fundamental difference of opinion.
I didn't propose lynching them, I meant exactly what I said - I don't know why all the votes are on you and Percy in particular.RedCoyote wrote:These are almost as bad as Baby's suggestions. They seem completely arbitrary in light of Dry-fit's flip given that both of them were virtually removed from the discussion. Perhaps this is exactly why they speak to you, but I couldn't disagree more.Elmo 480 wrote:I think we should be lynching someone off the wagon, but I'm not sure precisely how we narrowed it down to these two. Like, no-one has brought up Mina or Nikanor yet, and I don't know why.
Because I don't think you're a better lynch than who I'm voting for.Mina wrote:Um...maybe I shouldn't tempt fate, but in that case, whyaren'tyou proposing a lynch of me or Nikanor?
My point is precisely what I said. I did not say any of the above things.Mina wrote:What exactly is your point here? Are you saying, "Guys, there are nice juicy mislynch targets that you can make cases on, if you want, at which point I might jump on the wagon?" Are you saying we're better lynches than Red/Percy/LrdWhyt/Baby Spice? Are you saying someone should propose our lynchfor no other reasonthan because we're off the wagon?
I'm largely indifferent beyond voting someone who wasn't on the wagon (out of principle), the only reason I'm voting Red is because of my earlier suspicions.Mina wrote:I know your vote is on RC, but are you opposed to a Percy lynch? Right now, is there anyone you suspect who is on the Dry-Fit wagon?
I can't remember the exact timing, but I think he was absent for most of the wagon.Mina wrote:Why did you single out me and Nikanor, and not, say, LrdWhyt?
All due respect, fitz, but that doesn't really answer the question. Although I like you going after Sotty, it just doesn't seem like the most opportune time to do so. Further, when there have been allegations issued against Percy, you should address to some degree with either agreement, disagreement, or what have you. If Percy hasn't done anything scummy, why are we wrong for thinking so?fitz 495 wrote:The only thing scummy regarding percy IMO was his absence from the Dry-fit wagon. But that doesn't really mean anything as not everyone off the DF wagon can be scum and I would be surprised if there was scum on the DF wagon as well. The "big omission" is due to an absence of suspcion.
You did sneak a Kscope comment in there, my mistake. I retract that.Sotty 498 wrote:See, this makes no sense to me. How does calling out my two biggest town reads hurt the Dry-Fit wagon? I also voted Dry Fit in the end which is more than you did, so your stance that it makes me look worse is pretty ridiculous.
One's a small, closed, mostly hand-picked game with quite a few power roles, and the other is a large, mountainous, mostly open sign ups game. I don't think I'm being different. I think the environments are probably as different as two games could be.Elmo 509 wrote:Different from Hoopla's game.
I dispute that. He's being far too emotional, contrived, and flighty.Elmo 509 wrote:I don't see why at all. Your reasoning is completely independent from my opinions, which you still haven't given. You have just stated "Fur did X" and implied it's scummy without explaining why. Very probably we have different premises, which is best dealt with by stating yours.
When someone is as unprincipled as Fur is, I've found it to be a potential indicator of scum. I'm not just implying here, and I backed my rhetoric up with a vote.RC 392 wrote:Furcolow is absolutely all over the place. Not just in the above post, but throughout this entire game. He's on full panic mode now and letting every emotion go that he can. He's a complete loose cannon. If you haven't paid as much attention to his posts throughout this game, you owe it to yourself to check him out in isolation. If he's town, he's too weak-willed and emotional. Every time I've looked the other way when someone has tried to appease everyone he could, I've regretted it. In general I've found that scum are more likely to placate in a manner similar to Fur.
Unlike some people, I don't know how players will flip. I was very clear that I didn't want Dry-fit to be lynched before we had an alternative wagon. Since that advice wasn't heeded (which turned out to be a good call given Dry-fit's alignment), the best thing for the town to do is see who was trying to underhandedly sabotage the Dry-fit wagon, regardless of their votes. If you ask me, those three people are you, Sotty, and Percy.Fur 510 wrote:RedCoyote, what makes you so sure of percy, yet you wouldn't vote dry-fit?
Yep.Percy wrote:My initial read of Dry-fit was scummy, but I was seeing scum in the way the wagon was developing, and I didn't think there was enough for a lynch. I was wrong.
Lol. The mod might as well have confirmed. But you need to keep up your undermining. I'm appreciating the "hannity". And whats with this "case"?? You got a case me...lol i'd love to hear it.Percy wrote:It's a fact that you were third on the Dry-fit wagon, and you gave it a big push.Hannity 418 wrote:vote Percyso now that I'm confirmed town Lets nail another scum.
...
It does buy you a lot of town points, doesn't it. Fuck, I was so sure I was on to something with you.
Hmmmm. I'm going to leave off my case for the moment. But I'm not considering you confirmed, and I'll still be keeping a close eye on you.
Lets seee...(what happened to his furc read?)Percy wrote:Fuck. Fuck!
With my Hannity read blown, and my RedCoyote read blown, I'm reeling and need to re-read.
Easy vote on Furc-VI yesterday. Easy vote on obv-VI BS today. Trying to be very non-confrontational aye Percy.Percy wrote:Based on nothing more than the slip that has been pointed out before, I'm going toVote: Baby Spice. For those that missed it, here it is again:I really like this slip for BS-scum. I'm going to re-read and figure out whether my vote should stay, but that's where I want to go right now.jason wrote:Note the bold! Vote on TOWN.... now how is BS so sure eh?Baby Spice wrote:Hmm, Jason's #98. Blatant buddy on Sotty anda vote on townthat includes buddying as a reason.
BS is an easy mislynch. You don't want him here in lylo...but we dont need him dead yetjasonT1981 wrote:I actually wouldn't mind seeing the case on Percy. I'm still undecided about it. BS right now is my no1 pick as scum.
Easy mislynches on VI's.Percy wrote: I think jason, havingfitz, Locke Lamora and Benmage are probtown, along with RC. I think IAI is town for reasons I said earlier. I had a townread of KScope, but no more, he's solidly null. I still think Furcolow is scummy, but I think Baby Spice is worse.
QFTLocke Lamora wrote:I'm a bit behind on this game, but based on a quick glance through Percy's ISO, it's quite clear he's a good candidate for Dry-fit's buddy. The first time he mentions him, he includes him in his scumreads with no other explanation, which I find to be a good tell. He then moves from saying he's scummy but he prefers his own wagons more to casting doubt on the wagon because of the people on it. There are several attempts to derail the wagon without ever really making an extensive effort to analyse it or Dry-fit's play.
Vote: Percy
Could also go for a Nikanor lynch. Jason is clearly town.
RC aint being lynched today. Sorry. Too many opposed.KaleiÐoscøpe wrote:Let's lynch either Percy or Redcoyote before thursday, so we don't waste this time.
Really. I, who made the dryfit lynch a reality, see BS as a massive VI. Noone would be so blatant to accuse me. You're pushing an obvious mislynch on an easy VI, and it aint flying today chief. You hang.Percy wrote:Earlier in the day I had a townread of mongoose, largely gut-based. But there was some weirdness that I pointed out here. And while everyone is piling on me, how about this quote from mongoose:Add in Baby Spice's slip, her strange Benmage case post-flip (and pre-flip, tbh) and her present lurking through Phase 2, and I think we've got a great candidate for Dry-fit's partner.mongoose wrote:I dont see anything wrong with dryfit to be honest. I think everything he has said can be justified. On the other hand, redcoyote's posts aren't really that great. There is alot of irrelevant and silly stuff, along with some questionable points (like his votes on sotty and nikanor, I didn't quite catch the reason for those). However there has been alot of stuff I think is townie behavior as well. While I think that the judgment of older, better players than me shouldn't be disregarded, i still think that the case on furcolow is stronger, so I keep my vote there
This.KaleiÐoscøpe wrote:Let's lynch Percy today and take a closer look at RedCoyote tomorrow.
One in which you were a vanilla townie, attacked a bunch of people and then locked onto me for the rest of the game, the other in which you vaguely mumbled you kinda sorta didn't like some people, made a few ingratiating comments, and basically sat back waiting for a wagon to be provided. None of that is explained by a difference in setup, not least because you couldn't have known how many power roles were in the first game. The only differences are that you don't have to worry about accidentally running up a power role, which should make youRedCoyote wrote:One's a small, closed, mostly hand-picked game with quite a few power roles, and the other is a large, mountainous, mostly open sign ups game. I don't think I'm being different. I think the environments are probably as different as two games could be.
Are you going to make any attempt to answer my question? Let's make a list of things you've actually said here.RedCoyote wrote:I dispute that. He's being far too emotional, contrived, and flighty.Elmo 509 wrote:I don't see why at all. Your reasoning is completely independent from my opinions, which you still haven't given. You have just stated "Fur did X" and implied it's scummy without explaining why. Very probably we have different premises, which is best dealt with by stating yours.
When someone is as unprincipled as Fur is, I've found it to be a potential indicator of scum. I'm not just implying here, and I backed my rhetoric up with a vote.RC 392 wrote:Furcolow is absolutely all over the place. Not just in the above post, but throughout this entire game. He's on full panic mode now and letting every emotion go that he can. He's a complete loose cannon. If you haven't paid as much attention to his posts throughout this game, you owe it to yourself to check him out in isolation. If he's town, he's too weak-willed and emotional. Every time I've looked the other way when someone has tried to appease everyone he could, I've regretted it. In general I've found that scum are more likely to placate in a manner similar to Fur.
When people are that obvtown, why not call them town? and Jason, not pushing a scumslip. Pushing a really weird reaction.Jason wrote:BabySpice.. you are hellbent on pushing a scumslip on me... how do you respond to accusations of a scumslip from yourself?
Scummy idea that can only help scum is scummy. beating on the player who prooved it scummy is scummy. Ergo ...sotty wrote: what is your case on [Benmage]
Wishy washy language comment is just so much ffttt! if it's scummy I call it scummy. If it's hinky I call it hinky. Hinky =/= scummy. (But it may be)Wishy washy language is wishy washy.
(That means I find it scummy btw)
boo hiss, unfair advantageYou should probably know I am married to the mod,
It's keeping up with your bloody game that's killing my time Percy!Percy wrote:and her present lurking through Phase 2,
Actually, no I don't think I did.Mina wrote:Did you notice that I was on V/LA for a week
I thought I saw an early Sotty slip, but I had missed a post. Percy voted without giving a reason, but I ultimately had a different reason anyway. Regardless, that wasn't "provided". Then the jason wagon wasn't "provided". Nikanor was voting jason for completely unrelated reasons, and you pointed out something that I had also noticed. You didn't pursue, so I effectively led that attack. Later, jason wasn't trying very hard to push Fur. He made a few comments in his original vote, then left it there for several pages without mentioning it. I never referenced jason in my Fur vote either, so that was hardly "provided". Benmage's Percy vote here in the second phase was, again, a vote without reason. If anything Benmage's vote was just an extension of his bias attitude toward Percy throughout the game. I easily took ownership of this wagon, far from having it "provided" for me. If your underlying point here is that I'm not being aggressive enough, then I think you need to look over the evidence again. If your point is that I'm not the first official vote on these wagons, then you're being unreasonable.Elmo 515 wrote:One in which you were a vanilla townie, attacked a bunch of people and then locked onto me for the rest of the game, the other in which you vaguely mumbled you kinda sorta didn't like some people, made a few ingratiating comments, and basically sat back waiting for a wagon to be provided. None of that is explained by a difference in setup, not least because you couldn't have known how many power roles were in the first game.