notscience - 2 - ArcAngel9, Wisdom
Malakittens - 1 - RayFrost
ObsessedWithCats - 1 - Smudger
Wisdom - 1 - notscience
Not Voting: Malakittens, ObsessedWithCats
With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.
Deadline: (expired on 2013-11-05 13:10:55)
I don't know how long's long enough but I'm not letting this drop and we're 2 days from the deadline.In post 469, ObsessedWithCats wrote:If yes...In post 456, ObsessedWithCats wrote:And you still haven't commented on why you hated the votes on me or how Guyett's town-flip affects your reads from the end of D1.
lol
Why did you replace in then?
Because NS is cool.In post 504, Wisdom wrote:Why did you replace in then?
malakittens this is for you then..In post 455, Smudger wrote:In post 453, Evil Regals wrote:As for Rach-wagon in Day 1.. She was at L-1 with no competing wagons which suggests to me that scum is ether a) piggybacking that wagon or b) scum is bussing their buddy.
Rach to me looked town Day 1
with regard to a) you read my post then?
as for b) if they were bussing why did Rach not hammer? in fact she actually said so at the time, or is that WIFOM from her?
So which is it a or b? come on don't sit on the fence.
In post 514, Malakittens wrote:Yeah those who keep telling me to answer questions. I already said I have to reread the thread in order to give them. I don't remember half the shit that happened Day 1. I'm getting to it tonight after work because I need to do something for modding.
AA -- why are you even attempting to 'comprise' with wisdom when you have a town read on me?
No.In post 518, Wisdom wrote:Then vote mala
Guyett's town flip makes me sad only because there was a huge level of emotional manilupation in his posts that wasn't there in town games of his. Which is partially a reason why I voted him, but didn't want to let on that I was at the time familiar with most of this player list, but like 1-2 players.In post 501, ObsessedWithCats wrote:I don't know how long's long enough but I'm not letting this drop and we're 2 days from the deadline.In post 469, ObsessedWithCats wrote:If yes...In post 456, ObsessedWithCats wrote:And you still haven't commented on why you hated the votes on me or how Guyett's town-flip affects your reads from the end of D1.
VOTE: Malakittens
The same applies to notscience regarding any response to any part of the thread ever, but if he's doing something to his meta by being useless on purpose then I feel my time's better spent going after the one who's promised input.
So I can quickly put him to L-1 and you can hammer w/o a claim and then put us into possible LyLo tommorow, no.In post 520, Wisdom wrote:Ok, can you vote ns then?